![]() |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2733424)
DB was indeed terminated but there was compensation. Not full compensation but a significant amount of it with the Note. According to the ADC Dispatch notes compensation was aimed for provide pilots 49% FAE after conservative investment gains.
Saying your Retirement went to zero is an exaggeration. Statements like that is why some are saying the call for a DB by some pilots is an attempted money grab after poor investment decisions. Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk Yup, all us senior guys want to do is "money grab." :rolleyes: All I can say is I sure hope you young whipper snappers don't have to go thru what we did. But you know what they say, what goes around comes around. I hope all of you will be adequately prepared. Denny |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 2733401)
Obviously this is pointed at me. You do realize the pension described in the article is a traditional DB like ours was and not a hybrid DB that is being discussed?
|
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2733306)
What also needs to be clarified here is the term "diversification". What Denny is alluding to is not diversification of your investments, but diversification of the vehicle. Our current 401k already has the ability to diversify your investments over multiple asset classes(Domestic stock, Foreign Stock, Emerging market stock, Real Estate, Bonds, Commodities, Alternatives). This investment diversification can lead to multiple passive income streams at Retirement age.
For the most part, the only difference between our current 401k vehicle and the micro DB being explored is risk and control. IMO, the pilot group overwhelming wants to keep and enhance(increased DC) our current vehicle because each pilot controls their own destiny vs being forced to place your money with a DB Fund Manager. I say max the DC, give us the raise (Now-Money) AND look at the new DB options. To be clear where I'm coming from, I was hired 'after the fall' so I never had a DB. I lived through the lean times flying freight, being furloughed from an FE job at a national, getting on with a regional and surviving the long slow slog to mainline hiring, always keeping my application current. I got hired at 'the beginning of the wave' and have maxed my 401(k) since getting on board, and will do fine as long as I stay alive for the next 15 years. I'm open for any IMPROVEMENTS to retirement that don't require ANY gives. |
Originally Posted by captkdobbs
(Post 2733460)
The problem I have with just an increase to the DC is that once we hit the 415(c) limits, it's all taxable. I love the idea of increasing the DC to the point where the company's contribution is maxing me out, but then I still want more sheltered money.
I say max the DC, give us the raise (Now-Money) AND look at the new DB options. I'm open for any IMPROVEMENTS to retirement that don't require ANY gives. |
Originally Posted by captkdobbs
(Post 2733460)
The problem I have with just an increase to the DC is that once we hit the 415(c) limits, it's all taxable. I love the idea of increasing the DC to the point where the company's contribution is maxing me out, but then I still want more sheltered money.
I say max the DC, give us the raise (Now-Money) AND look at the new DB options. To be clear where I'm coming from, I was hired 'after the fall' so I never had a DB. I lived through the lean times flying freight, being furloughed from an FE job at a national, getting on with a regional and surviving the long slow slog to mainline hiring, always keeping my application current. I got hired at 'the beginning of the wave' and have maxed my 401(k) since getting on board, and will do fine as long as I stay alive for the next 15 years. I'm open for any IMPROVEMENTS to retirement that don't require ANY gives. While saving for retirement in tax advantaged accounts is important, IMO, especially at our income levels, it is way overdone and has convinced folks to lock away the money they worked for with no access for decades. House rich, 401k rich but Cashflow poor is real. And the folks running Banks and Wallstreet are getting filthy rich off of all of that. Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by captkdobbs
(Post 2733460)
The problem I have with just an increase to the DC is that once we hit the 415(c) limits, it's all taxable. I love the idea of increasing the DC to the point where the company's contribution is maxing me out, but then I still want more sheltered money.
I say max the DC, give us the raise (Now-Money) AND look at the new DB options. To be clear where I'm coming from, I was hired 'after the fall' so I never had a DB. I lived through the lean times flying freight, being furloughed from an FE job at a national, getting on with a regional and surviving the long slow slog to mainline hiring, always keeping my application current. I got hired at 'the beginning of the wave' and have maxed my 401(k) since getting on board, and will do fine as long as I stay alive for the next 15 years. I'm open for any IMPROVEMENTS to retirement that don't require ANY gives. |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2733306)
What also needs to be clarified here is the term "diversification". What Denny is alluding to is not diversification of your investments, but diversification of the vehicle. Our current 401k already has the ability to diversify your investments over multiple asset classes(Domestic stock, Foreign Stock, Emerging market stock, Real Estate, Bonds, Commodities, Alternatives). This investment diversification can lead to multiple passive income streams at Retirement age.
For the most part, the only difference between our current 401k vehicle and the micro DB being explored is risk and control. IMO, the pilot group overwhelming wants to keep and enhance(increased DC) our current vehicle because each pilot controls their own destiny vs being forced to place your money with a DB Fund Manager. Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by crewdawg
(Post 2733449)
Not directed at you Denny, but the DB crowd who want 60% FAE DB or nothing...they're most definitely out there. As I've said, I'm not totally against the idea (such as the hybrid DB) but still trying to educate myself on them. I'm all for more streams of retirement income, which is why I also own rental properties and have a separate brokerage account for investing excess funds in solid dividend paying stocks.
My personal feeling is the best we will achieve is some kind of retirement medical. It would be a start. Denny |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2733477)
IMO at our income level we don't need anymore tax sheltered money. An argument could be made that taxes will go up in the future and it's better off to pay taxes now and grow money in a Roth, Brokerage or alternative fund like Real Estate. Lastly, DC Excess Cash allows you to pay taxes now and put your money in investments that can create passive income streams much sooner than retirement age.
While saving for retirement in tax advantaged accounts is important, IMO, especially at our income levels, it is way overdone and has convinced folks to lock away the money they worked for with no access for decades. House rich, 401k rich but Cashflow poor is real. And the folks running Banks and Wallstreet are getting filthy rich off of all of that. Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk Everyone can put as much or as little in our current DC so your argument about being cash poor is null. If you (the all inclusive you) think you're going to be cash poor, don't put as much in. But please don't assume everyone is in that situation. Denny |
Originally Posted by TurbineDriver
(Post 2733488)
This x1000. If I want diversification I will just select a different investment within my 401k. Giving the company control over my money in a DB pension is certainly not increasing my diversification! It’s increasing the risk that I will lose the money altogether in a bankruptcy!
Denny |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:53 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands