Retirement...Again! (insert smiley face here)
#251
The issue that we (DL) have is different groups. There are those who are senior in both age and seniority ranges that saw the previous DB die (obviously, by this thread, in a few different ways, but none have the initial promise-however you slice it). There are those with a military pension and tricare. There are those with only the 401k after shambles (DZ folks). There are new folks who never had a DB. We all get to meet 401C as a “soft limit” (in simply my opinion) with a realization that the next contract will likely be the last for close to half of DL pilots. Yes, it’s easy to say 10 years will be half, harder to say where a contract 1-5 years from now will bring, and where folks in the last 5 years will try to shelter their money-health and other unknowns, known. Life happens. So what do folks want? Well, sure, (real time) give me 50% FAE for some that want the pension restored. That’s not happening. Reality says so. Some want to bank away as much as possible, safely, for the next 1-10 years in something tax sheltered, others have a longer horizon ranging from maybe 10-35 years.
So what can be done?
Billon(s) dollar question.
Well, 401C is higher in 2019, but not by much. Roth IRA rules (backdoor for most) was raised a little for 2019. HSA is a thing now to max out, for those without tricare. For those with more than 10 years, a 401C max/back door Roth IRA/HSA is all that can be done, in pure “retirement labeled” accounts. That’s a good chunk of money in coffers for retirement. Yes, you can do a mega Roth with 401A, but those doing that likely have a tax professional helping with that and/or have other taxable income streams, by opinion. Those with 20+ to go can max everything out in tax shelters and have plenty for retirement with a little personal finance of a savings account and taxable brokerage. Not saying that’s what to do, but the numbers support it if you are doing a Roth 401k/Roth IRA and using some 401A profit sharing to help bolster, with a full HSA to boot. The numbers can be quite amazing, with tax sheltering, with historical returns.
Cool stuff, but what about the other 50% of the pilot group that doesn’t have that time?!
Well that’s the conundrum. Regardless of time left on property the last stats have more than half the DL group hitting 401C limits of 55K hitting the 401K. (2019-56k, Ira backdoor-6k, catchups still the same by my math~$7k between the 401/IRA)
So this is a first world problem. Yup, it’s still a problem. For higher income earners, another “silo” is needed. Only thing untapped? Hello DB. That’s the only other avenue for a retirement tax shelter. The new “hybrid DB” is a far cry from the previous idea of a pension. Everyone shares the risk from day 1. The company must fund it, they can’t count it on it’s books (this sounds like a 401k...right?) but the money is pooled for those involved. The 16%DPSP on the check, it’s not taxed now, but growing in an account of the world economy instead of a IOU in a pension. That helps those making their top dollars now, to retire shortly to a (nominally, lower tax bracket). It also allows the company to contribute. Not owe, payday by payday contribute. I have yet to find PBGC insurance costs on this plan. So it’s a pool of money, off company books, managed outside of the company, with accounts in our names and DL contributions each paycheck. Sure, the market has been in a tailspin, and will likely remain volatile with politics, but it’s a tax shelter of 16% for more than half the pilots’ income, with additional contributions, for tax savings and growth prior to retirement.
So I ask, what do you do in your CURRENTLY taxable account of DPSP cash, without company contribution? Well, you are already down 30%ish by taxes, now have capital gains (if you made any in 2018....), and you have no contributions.
Back to square 1- where are you at DL?-.... nobody loses if your DPSP goes to an account that is tax sheltered now, gets a contribution from the company, and grows with the market (managed by those who manage money-in lue of those who fly planes and think they are market professionals).
That’s the new DB. Yes, the 401K and DC remains, BUT.... that overage AKA- 16% on the check as DPSP cash? Yup, that goes to an account that grows as retirement and not immediate income with a x% contribution from DL to help it grow... we call that the new (hybrid) DB.
Holy crap I sound like a salesman. Just do the damn research yourself to find the loophole not explored. The kicker becomes taxes. The company gets to write off the contribution, you get to defer the taxes. Uncle Sam always collects in the end, and by my understanding... upon retirement the account is obviously yours, but it’s a taxable account. So you can put it into an IRA (RMD at 70.5) or cash out (taxes now). I imagine (can’t find confirmation) that you could roll it into an immediate annuity, which has its own yearly tax implications, but less than immediate. Still ends up better than full taxes in your high income years.
At the end of the day, the reps will decide, all will adapt.
So what can be done?
Billon(s) dollar question.
Well, 401C is higher in 2019, but not by much. Roth IRA rules (backdoor for most) was raised a little for 2019. HSA is a thing now to max out, for those without tricare. For those with more than 10 years, a 401C max/back door Roth IRA/HSA is all that can be done, in pure “retirement labeled” accounts. That’s a good chunk of money in coffers for retirement. Yes, you can do a mega Roth with 401A, but those doing that likely have a tax professional helping with that and/or have other taxable income streams, by opinion. Those with 20+ to go can max everything out in tax shelters and have plenty for retirement with a little personal finance of a savings account and taxable brokerage. Not saying that’s what to do, but the numbers support it if you are doing a Roth 401k/Roth IRA and using some 401A profit sharing to help bolster, with a full HSA to boot. The numbers can be quite amazing, with tax sheltering, with historical returns.
Cool stuff, but what about the other 50% of the pilot group that doesn’t have that time?!
Well that’s the conundrum. Regardless of time left on property the last stats have more than half the DL group hitting 401C limits of 55K hitting the 401K. (2019-56k, Ira backdoor-6k, catchups still the same by my math~$7k between the 401/IRA)
So this is a first world problem. Yup, it’s still a problem. For higher income earners, another “silo” is needed. Only thing untapped? Hello DB. That’s the only other avenue for a retirement tax shelter. The new “hybrid DB” is a far cry from the previous idea of a pension. Everyone shares the risk from day 1. The company must fund it, they can’t count it on it’s books (this sounds like a 401k...right?) but the money is pooled for those involved. The 16%DPSP on the check, it’s not taxed now, but growing in an account of the world economy instead of a IOU in a pension. That helps those making their top dollars now, to retire shortly to a (nominally, lower tax bracket). It also allows the company to contribute. Not owe, payday by payday contribute. I have yet to find PBGC insurance costs on this plan. So it’s a pool of money, off company books, managed outside of the company, with accounts in our names and DL contributions each paycheck. Sure, the market has been in a tailspin, and will likely remain volatile with politics, but it’s a tax shelter of 16% for more than half the pilots’ income, with additional contributions, for tax savings and growth prior to retirement.
So I ask, what do you do in your CURRENTLY taxable account of DPSP cash, without company contribution? Well, you are already down 30%ish by taxes, now have capital gains (if you made any in 2018....), and you have no contributions.
Back to square 1- where are you at DL?-.... nobody loses if your DPSP goes to an account that is tax sheltered now, gets a contribution from the company, and grows with the market (managed by those who manage money-in lue of those who fly planes and think they are market professionals).
That’s the new DB. Yes, the 401K and DC remains, BUT.... that overage AKA- 16% on the check as DPSP cash? Yup, that goes to an account that grows as retirement and not immediate income with a x% contribution from DL to help it grow... we call that the new (hybrid) DB.
Holy crap I sound like a salesman. Just do the damn research yourself to find the loophole not explored. The kicker becomes taxes. The company gets to write off the contribution, you get to defer the taxes. Uncle Sam always collects in the end, and by my understanding... upon retirement the account is obviously yours, but it’s a taxable account. So you can put it into an IRA (RMD at 70.5) or cash out (taxes now). I imagine (can’t find confirmation) that you could roll it into an immediate annuity, which has its own yearly tax implications, but less than immediate. Still ends up better than full taxes in your high income years.
At the end of the day, the reps will decide, all will adapt.
#252
The big issue/question for me is what happens if you leave early? I assume there would be some requirements for receiving such a DB (age and years of service)? I’d rather just have what I earn, when I earn it, and have the ability to say “see ya” anytime I’d like, tax consequences be damned. I mean, one way or another, you’ll be paying taxes. It’s impossible to tell right now what the tax landscape and retirement laws will be in 30 years. JMO.
Case in point... my wife works for a large corporation and has both a 401K and pension. She is vested with the company match in the 401k and the DB is x% of her salary per year. By design (based on planned pay raises and market historical returns) if she only did the company match of the 401k and her pension she would have 50% FAE after either 25 or 30 years. With a newborn at home she is likely not going back to work, and her 401k money can go to an IRA and her pension can either be paid out as a lump sum, an IRA as well, or immediately annuitized. The hybrid DB is the same as being discussed. If you want to walk away at 55-60, or even earlier, your 401K is as it is today and your account in the DB is yours as well. The nice part is you can withdraw the money before a 401k.
I do not expect the DB to be the type of money % that previous DB’s had. The idea of 50% FAE based on DB alone is not reliastic for even the youngest guy in my opinion. If the company contributes 5% and all DPSP cash hits it as well- that can be a good chunk of money in a tax sheltered account for someone hitting retirement IF there are years to go. For folks retiring in the next few years it won’t be as much but it’s better than the 16% excess being taxed now at arguably the highest tax bracket of their working careers, plus 5% (hypothetical DB contribution).
All I’m trying to say is that it’s worth investigating with open eyes as additional retirement money that is tax sheltered during the working years. The Honda Civic of 1991 is not the same as the 2019 model.
#253
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
DAL DB Termination and the PBGC
Let’s step out of the timeline for a moment and consider some additional information as it relates to the DAL DB Plan termination. At the time the plan was terminated, it had approximately $1.7 billion in assets compared with approximately $4.7 billion in liabilities. Additionally, the two Delta non-qualified plans had been costing Delta cash outlays of approximately $84 million per year in benefit payments. The assets of the DAL DB Plan were turned over to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) on December 31, 2006 and the PBGC became responsible for providing benefit payments calculated in accordance with the DAL DB Plan rules and formulas, but subject to the PBGC’s priority scheme and benefit limitations.
The detailed rules, regulations, and limitations of the PBGC are beyond the scope of this Report, but they will be discussed in broad terms. The first limitation is that the PBGC doesn’t protect non-qualified benefits at all, meaning the pre-merger Delta pilots who had a formula benefit that exceeded the 401(a)(17) limits immediately suffered a loss of the non-qualified portion of that benefit. Next, the PBGC has developed six “priority categories”, labeled PC-1 thru PC-6, to determine how the plan’s assets are allocated to accrued benefits. Without getting too deep into the technicalities of the structure, the categories that are relevant to the DAL DB Plan are categories PC-3, PC-4, and PC-5.
The benefit paid under the PC-3 calculation is the benefit the pilot would have been eligible to receive had he retired three years prior to the date of plan termination (DOPT), but using the DAL DB Plan provisions and IRS limitations that were in place five years prior to DOPT. So any pilot who was already retired, or was eligible to retire, on September 2, 2003, is generally owed a PC-3 benefit. When the DAL DB Plan terminated, its assets were sufficient to cover only 93% of all eligible pilots’ PC-3 benefit amounts.
Since the assets of the plan were exhausted paying PC-3 benefits, the PBGC itself was then responsible for paying all applicable pilots a PC-4 benefit. Generally, this benefit is calculated as the lesser of a) the pilot’s full vested qualified formula benefit, or b) the PC-4 maximum guaranteed amount of $30,978 (at age 60) for a plan terminating in 2006. For pilots who have benefits payable in PC-3, their PC-4 benefit is the excess (if any) of the benefit determined under this PC-4 calculation over their PC-3 benefit.
However, in the case of the DAL DB Plan, the PBGC (as part of its negotiations with Delta in bankruptcy) agreed to the termination of the plan only if Delta committed to pay the PBGC a note of $225 million upon bankruptcy exit. Furthermore, as a result of the termination, the PBGC received a bankruptcy claim in the amount of $2.2 billion. Upon Delta’s exit from bankruptcy, the note and claim were valued at an aggregate $1.23 billion and that money was shared, via a complicated formula, between plan participants and the PBGC in relation to their respective losses. As a result, participants’ PC-3 benefits increased to 100%, and additional funds flowed into PC-5. The result is that those pilots whose accrued benefit exceeded their PC-3 or PC-4 limited amounts were entitled to an additional benefit in PC-5. The PC-5 benefit, in general terms, covers the remaining benefit under the plan -- but only to the extent that there are PC-5 assets allocated to cover these amounts.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Let’s step out of the timeline for a moment and consider some additional information as it relates to the DAL DB Plan termination. At the time the plan was terminated, it had approximately $1.7 billion in assets compared with approximately $4.7 billion in liabilities. Additionally, the two Delta non-qualified plans had been costing Delta cash outlays of approximately $84 million per year in benefit payments. The assets of the DAL DB Plan were turned over to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) on December 31, 2006 and the PBGC became responsible for providing benefit payments calculated in accordance with the DAL DB Plan rules and formulas, but subject to the PBGC’s priority scheme and benefit limitations.
The detailed rules, regulations, and limitations of the PBGC are beyond the scope of this Report, but they will be discussed in broad terms. The first limitation is that the PBGC doesn’t protect non-qualified benefits at all, meaning the pre-merger Delta pilots who had a formula benefit that exceeded the 401(a)(17) limits immediately suffered a loss of the non-qualified portion of that benefit. Next, the PBGC has developed six “priority categories”, labeled PC-1 thru PC-6, to determine how the plan’s assets are allocated to accrued benefits. Without getting too deep into the technicalities of the structure, the categories that are relevant to the DAL DB Plan are categories PC-3, PC-4, and PC-5.
The benefit paid under the PC-3 calculation is the benefit the pilot would have been eligible to receive had he retired three years prior to the date of plan termination (DOPT), but using the DAL DB Plan provisions and IRS limitations that were in place five years prior to DOPT. So any pilot who was already retired, or was eligible to retire, on September 2, 2003, is generally owed a PC-3 benefit. When the DAL DB Plan terminated, its assets were sufficient to cover only 93% of all eligible pilots’ PC-3 benefit amounts.
Since the assets of the plan were exhausted paying PC-3 benefits, the PBGC itself was then responsible for paying all applicable pilots a PC-4 benefit. Generally, this benefit is calculated as the lesser of a) the pilot’s full vested qualified formula benefit, or b) the PC-4 maximum guaranteed amount of $30,978 (at age 60) for a plan terminating in 2006. For pilots who have benefits payable in PC-3, their PC-4 benefit is the excess (if any) of the benefit determined under this PC-4 calculation over their PC-3 benefit.
However, in the case of the DAL DB Plan, the PBGC (as part of its negotiations with Delta in bankruptcy) agreed to the termination of the plan only if Delta committed to pay the PBGC a note of $225 million upon bankruptcy exit. Furthermore, as a result of the termination, the PBGC received a bankruptcy claim in the amount of $2.2 billion. Upon Delta’s exit from bankruptcy, the note and claim were valued at an aggregate $1.23 billion and that money was shared, via a complicated formula, between plan participants and the PBGC in relation to their respective losses. As a result, participants’ PC-3 benefits increased to 100%, and additional funds flowed into PC-5. The result is that those pilots whose accrued benefit exceeded their PC-3 or PC-4 limited amounts were entitled to an additional benefit in PC-5. The PC-5 benefit, in general terms, covers the remaining benefit under the plan -- but only to the extent that there are PC-5 assets allocated to cover these amounts.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
#254
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
You left out one other factor of why the PBGC payments can be as high as 8000 at age 65. All of the above is based on retiring at age 60 since that was the mandatory age number in place at plan termination. Waiting to age 65 increases that number substantially. As a example a 4400 a month PBGC payment goes to 7200 a month at age 65. As I mentioned before there are additional reasons beyond the increase that make taking the money prior to 65 a poor choice.
#255
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Well I guess the benefit statement I have from the PBGC is in error as well as the statements from many friends. Anyone with a PBGC benefit can go online and see there exact benefit at any age you might want to commence payment. I ran mine for ages from 60 to 67. The benefit can be deferred past 65 for a greater increase if desired however 65 appears to be the sweetspot when tied in with aspects of the disability plan and the PBGC rules on survivorship.
#256
I see a lot of people holding their hands to their ears and yelling, "LaLaLaLaLaLa" when a DB is mentioned.
What if this DB is in addition to and not at the expense of our DC plan -- and our DPSP cash?
What if this DB is in addition to and not at the expense of our DC plan -- and our DPSP cash?
#257
1) People never thought the original DB would go away, but it did. Concerns that a future BK or whatever might get the "new" DB taken away somehow, or that the company uses it as a weapon to demand pay cuts down the road. Don't underestimate the ability of a company's lawyers when big money is at stake during tough times.
2) Apparently high management fees might reduce my returns
3) Takes away my ability to use the DSPS cash for other things, like my kids education fund, real estate, or other after-tax investments.
#258
I'll sum up my concerns:
1) People never thought the original DB would go away, but it did. Concerns that a future BK or whatever might get the "new" DB taken away somehow, or that the company uses it as a weapon to demand pay cuts down the road. Don't underestimate the ability of a company's lawyers when big money is at stake during tough times.
2) Apparently high management fees might reduce my returns
3) Takes away my ability to use the DSPS cash for other things, like my kids education fund, real estate, or other after-tax investments.
1) People never thought the original DB would go away, but it did. Concerns that a future BK or whatever might get the "new" DB taken away somehow, or that the company uses it as a weapon to demand pay cuts down the road. Don't underestimate the ability of a company's lawyers when big money is at stake during tough times.
2) Apparently high management fees might reduce my returns
3) Takes away my ability to use the DSPS cash for other things, like my kids education fund, real estate, or other after-tax investments.
#259
The first two parts still stand - as for #3, a "new" DB would be taking any increase in DC contribution and moving it to the DB - hence affecting my DPSP cash. Any money going to a DB is gonna come from somewhere. I'd prefer that in DPSP cash instead, for all three reasons.
#260
Control over the investment is the problem. Assuming a tax advantage and a 5% max return. The money is locked away from the individual and adds 4 hands to the pot, company, ALPA, managing firm and individual. When these accounts get large enough with little over site or control they become easy targets for recovery and amendment when things go poorly. The management firm will always be happy to charge for a plan adjustment and the money is not really yours until it's in your hand in retirement. Sharing the market risk means low returns because the fund would need consistent reliable returns to ensure solvency. An additional x% in salary or DC funding allows for individual choice. There will be no extra gain for the so called DZers. Just a conservative place to shelter your money for a few years.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



