Monroe energy
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 100
From: Road construction signholder
Let me put it this way. If UAL mgmt was kidnapped and put in charge of DAL circa 2008, we would likely still be successful, but do you think this successful? I don't.
#13
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
Sure we the employees are a notable, distinct positive, for many reasons. But we have a network department as brilliant as earlier generations at DAL were idiotic.
The network is amazing because you handed them a seamless merger allowing the synergies to fully realized
Let me put it this way. If UAL mgmt was kidnapped and put in charge of DAL circa 2008, we would likely still be successful, but do you think this successful? I don't.
The network is amazing because you handed them a seamless merger allowing the synergies to fully realized
Let me put it this way. If UAL mgmt was kidnapped and put in charge of DAL circa 2008, we would likely still be successful, but do you think this successful? I don't.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 100
From: Road construction signholder
Our employees choose not to unionize for various reasons, good and bad. I really don't think that "creating more value to the company" is one of them--more like "we don't want to pay union dues."
We'll just have to agree to disagree. I think our current management is very good, and noticeably better than the competition, and that is reflected in our numbers. We get a revenue premium compared to our competition. 15 years ago we had a revenue deficit--with the same non-union force--but a worse management and network team.
As for the refinery purchase, I don't really know enough. For every smug "it was a disaster" proclamation (as if anyone posting on this forum really has a clue) you can find another that will claim it was a big success. My personal gut feeling is that mgmt would not do it again if they had a magic time machine, and that it has been more trouble than any benefit it might have provided. That said, it was a "noble failure." At least for once, our leadership didn't just repeat the same tired old decades-long complaint of "gee we sure hope that the price of oil stays low--it's the difference between smashing success and bankruptcy."
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 0
And yet AA employees bemoan the fact that their PS is a far smaller percentage than ours....
Our employees choose not to unionize for various reasons, good and bad. I really don't think that "creating more value to the company" is one of them--more like "we don't want to pay union dues."
We'll just have to agree to disagree. I think our current management is very good, and noticeably better than the competition, and that is reflected in our numbers. We get a revenue premium compared to our competition. 15 years ago we had a revenue deficit--with the same non-union force--but a worse management and network team.
As for the refinery purchase, I don't really know enough. For every smug "it was a disaster" proclamation (as if anyone posting on this forum really has a clue) you can find another that will claim it was a big success. My personal gut feeling is that mgmt would not do it again if they had a magic time machine, and that it has been more trouble than any benefit it might have provided. That said, it was a "noble failure." At least for once, our leadership didn't just repeat the same tired old decades-long complaint of "gee we sure hope that the price of oil stays low--it's the difference between smashing success and bankruptcy."
Our employees choose not to unionize for various reasons, good and bad. I really don't think that "creating more value to the company" is one of them--more like "we don't want to pay union dues."
We'll just have to agree to disagree. I think our current management is very good, and noticeably better than the competition, and that is reflected in our numbers. We get a revenue premium compared to our competition. 15 years ago we had a revenue deficit--with the same non-union force--but a worse management and network team.
As for the refinery purchase, I don't really know enough. For every smug "it was a disaster" proclamation (as if anyone posting on this forum really has a clue) you can find another that will claim it was a big success. My personal gut feeling is that mgmt would not do it again if they had a magic time machine, and that it has been more trouble than any benefit it might have provided. That said, it was a "noble failure." At least for once, our leadership didn't just repeat the same tired old decades-long complaint of "gee we sure hope that the price of oil stays low--it's the difference between smashing success and bankruptcy."
Was the refinery a mistake? From what I’ve read, running an independent refinery is difficult if its not part of the supply chain. We may want to buy some oil fields too.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 100
From: Road construction signholder
Will we have the same management in 15, 20, x years? Most likely not. That is why it is important for those new here to realize that fortunes fluctuate over time. Your fortunes are tied to individuals and events beyond your control. Invest, spend carefully, and don’t be surprised if things go sideways at some point.
Was the refinery a mistake? From what I’ve read, running an independent refinery is difficult if its not part of the supply chain. We may want to buy some oil fields too.
Was the refinery a mistake? From what I’ve read, running an independent refinery is difficult if its not part of the supply chain. We may want to buy some oil fields too.

#17
Maybe the refinery made money, maybe on paper it didn't. Maybe it lowered the price of Jet-A, maybe not. But they tried and I'll give them credit for it.
#18
useless? Seriously?
#20
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



