![]() |
Originally Posted by Speedbird2263
(Post 3189227)
I’d imagine the A220s would be better suited to take over the 717 flying no? I remember when flying some DCI routes in the past with CR7&9s, quite a bit of those got upgraded to the 717 and the A220-100 would be a 1 for 1 replacement at least capacity wise.
|
Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
(Post 3189236)
Not from what I understand. The 717 replacement for DCI routes seems to focus on shorter routes that had high frequency. Think Chattanooga and Augusta from ATL. The A220 seems to go on routes that are longer and thinner that compete against another carrier’s hub. More like Delta flying the A220 from BOS to American’s DFW hub. A220 is a superior product with great fuel efficiency. That’s why it wins over the 717 and not necessarily are 1 for 1 replacement to the 717. That’s the perspective from an outsider looking in.
|
Originally Posted by Speedbird2263
(Post 3189257)
Agreed it is superior in product & efficiency. It will certainly be interesting to see how the DL network folks replace/upguage the 717 flying going forward.
|
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 3189262)
Especially since the large RJ "armada" is permanently reduced by 35.
|
Current plan is parked 717s will not return. Going forward with 50ish and will gradually retire those planes. Salute to the 717
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Redbird611
(Post 3189264)
Well, it is supposed to be anyway...
|
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 3189272)
The longer they wait the more it will cost them. Those 35 will be gone and I don't think we'll give any relief on that.
|
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 3189268)
Current plan is parked 717s will not return. Going forward with 50ish and will gradually retire those planes. Salute to the 717
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
|
Originally Posted by DLASFlyer
(Post 3189444)
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:13 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands