Search
Notices

Dog Mauls Pax

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2019, 06:50 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GucciBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: Fetal
Posts: 1,148
Default

Originally Posted by SayMach View Post
Does the legal phrase “ must accommodate” mean must allow to ride free? If not, there is an easy fix. Charge $200 for the animal in a crate in the cargo and charge $300 to go in the cabin. Make it clear to the passenger that it’s cheaper for the animal to ride in a crate.


If this theory is accurate it’s a great idea. I sat next to a passenger with a “therapy dog” that was an 8-week-old puppy. The Doogie Howser of therapy dogs!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GucciBoy is offline  
Old 06-01-2019, 07:10 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by SayMach View Post
Does the legal phrase “ must accommodate” mean must allow to ride free? If not, there is an easy fix. Charge $200 for the animal in a crate in the cargo and charge $300 to go in the cabin. Make it clear to the passenger that it’s cheaper for the animal to ride in a crate.
Motion seconded.

This whole fake ESA stuff clearly bloomed like Florida algae all the sudden because ppl wanted to avoid fees while taking the family pet with them. A small portion of that is the airlines faults because of a few awful and 100% preventable instances of pets being mishandled. That should never happen and if we put the same redline paranoia into that as we do D-0 then it wouldn't.

With all the call to actions out there we need one that completely eliminates ESA's and provides those exemptions for bona fide service animals only, which could include the equivalent of ESA's but they'd have to be trained and actually documented to the same standard. Otherwise they go in a crate and if too large to fit under the seat then they go in the bin. At that point its on us to step it up and guarantee their care and there's no reason there can't be accurate temperature monitoring and even picture tracking sent to people's phones especially when sometimes it costs more than a transcon loss leader ticket anyway.

ESA's have become the universal life church equivalent of "ordained ministers" and it needs to be walked back.
gloopy is offline  
Old 06-01-2019, 07:54 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Even service animals cannot be placed in the passenger compartment unless they can be secured as cargo. The airline is required to make a reasonable accommodation, which could include putting said person and animal up against a fuselage-seat bulkhead non-emergency row, if it exists, but unless that is possible, or it fits under the seat in front or is lap-child size and can be held a such, it's against 14 CFR to put it in the cabin. There is a cutout in the ADA for safety:

Airlines may exclude anyone from a flight if carrying the person would be inimical to the safety of the flight
https://www.transportation.gov/airco...s-disabilities

https://www.transportation.gov/indiv...upport-animals

They are also not required to comply with exotic/ridiculous requests like peacocks and pigs.

Placing an animal that can't be secured as cargo in the cabin would be contrary to safety. It's more egregious if you put this person on an asile or middle seat, blocking the fuselage-side seat(s) from being able to egress in an emergency.

The ESA thing is ridiculous, but it seems that this is "passed off" by the controls that should be in place to prevent it, such as ticket agents, gate agents, and the last line of defense, the flight attendants, which it should never get to, except in rare circumstances. Until airlines take those controls seriously and provide training and enforcement, this is going to continue.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 06-01-2019, 09:08 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
The ESA thing is ridiculous, but it seems that this is "passed off" by the controls that should be in place to prevent it, such as ticket agents, gate agents, and the last line of defense, the flight attendants, which it should never get to, except in rare circumstances. Until airlines take those controls seriously and provide training and enforcement, this is going to continue.
Yeah just like the radically oversized "carryon" bag nonsense. I'm not talking about something that doesn't fit in the size wize test bin at the gate because one dimention is slightly too much. I mean "carryon" bags that are 3-5 times (I've seen it) too big to ever even theoretically be brought onboard. And no I'm not referring to people who pay for a seat for a musical instrument or whatever. Saw one guy arrogantly swagger up to the gate and proclaim he was there for his entitled free bag check with the largest bag I've ever seen anyone even bring to an airport including to check. The agent, who clearly noticed and even commented on it, then proceded to simply enable this scammer's behavior by giving him his free checked sticker. Absolute nonsense.

IMO we need to put these checks at screening. Differencs between airlines are minuscule and at the very least make it the largest of any allowed carry ons. If it doesn't fit, you can't bring it. It would be self correcting instantly and even end up being less work for TSA as they wouldn't have to deal with it in the first place.
gloopy is offline  
Old 06-01-2019, 12:29 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,724
Default

My new word for the day is "Inimical." As in whom ever uses this is inimical to the spoken word. And the small safety animals too.
badflaps is offline  
Old 06-01-2019, 05:04 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NuGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,838
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
A few years ago my wife was attacked by a dog in our old neighborhood. One of these 70 lb dogs that would never hurt a fly and loves the kids and blah blah blah, dog broke free from the 80 lb kid walking it and ran 4 houses down to my wife was walking down the street. She put her arm up to protect her face and he chomped in to her arm requiring stitches.

By georgia law that really isnt a problem. You need to catch the dog on video the animal control officer admitted. The owner was given a warning.

I really have a low tolerance for dogs now. And funny you mentioned home depot, a few years ago my 3 year old and I were walking in a home depot and she turned the corner ahead of me and came face to face with a large pit being walked by a clueless young woman on a long leash. Never considered someone would bring a dog into a home depot.

Pit owners love their dogs, I understand that to a point. But they're not the ones who deal the rest of their lives with their face being mauled. Well. Except maybe the ones killed by their pits.

If my family member was attacked by a dog on a delta flight I'm suing the **** out of the owner and delta.
I love animals of all types, but as you point out, even the "best behaved animals" bite.

Around here, the Police (or Sheriff's department, if you live "out in the county") are adamant about taking the reports to put the owner "on notice". They have a "two bite" rule around here, and after the first incident, it seems owners are much more careful because of the consequences.

I was out eating one night, and this lady comes in with a HUGE dog. It just jumps up on the serving counter, and she not only let it do that, but did nothing to remove it. Probably violated a dozen health codes. The employees just shrugged it off, gave her the food, and when she left, proceeded to bleach down the entire counter (that's a lovely aroma when you're trying to eat).

It's not just the airlines, it's everywhere. It happens because people let it happen.
NuGuy is offline  
Old 06-03-2019, 12:32 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

ShyGuy is offline  
Old 06-03-2019, 12:41 PM
  #38  
Fly or Die
 
ESQ702's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by Flying Monkey View Post
7 or 8 years ago we had a woman onboard with an emotional support goose. Wearing a diaper.

Edit - The goose was wearing a diaper. I’m not going to guess what undergarments the woman was wearing.
LOL - nice. I just made that one up. I never guessed that would actually be a thing. Never underestimate the insanity of some people.

Someone please try and share how a goose supports a human emotionally. LOL...
ESQ702 is offline  
Old 06-03-2019, 03:34 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,724
Default

Originally Posted by ESQ702 View Post
LOL - nice. I just made that one up. I never guessed that would actually be a thing. Never underestimate the insanity of some people.

Someone please try and share how a goose supports a human emotionally. LOL...
One upside down on a platter at Christmas does wonders.
badflaps is offline  
Old 06-03-2019, 03:47 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by badflaps View Post
One upside down on a platter at Christmas does wonders.
But one in a crowded elevator invites a slap.
tomgoodman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Freight Dog
Hangar Talk
3
05-08-2010 05:46 PM
yyzhead
Foreign
0
02-07-2008 05:46 PM
palgia841
Major
9
12-07-2007 07:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices