Dog Mauls Pax
#31
Does the legal phrase “ must accommodate” mean must allow to ride free? If not, there is an easy fix. Charge $200 for the animal in a crate in the cargo and charge $300 to go in the cabin. Make it clear to the passenger that it’s cheaper for the animal to ride in a crate.
If this theory is accurate it’s a great idea. I sat next to a passenger with a “therapy dog” that was an 8-week-old puppy. The Doogie Howser of therapy dogs!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Does the legal phrase “ must accommodate” mean must allow to ride free? If not, there is an easy fix. Charge $200 for the animal in a crate in the cargo and charge $300 to go in the cabin. Make it clear to the passenger that it’s cheaper for the animal to ride in a crate.
This whole fake ESA stuff clearly bloomed like Florida algae all the sudden because ppl wanted to avoid fees while taking the family pet with them. A small portion of that is the airlines faults because of a few awful and 100% preventable instances of pets being mishandled. That should never happen and if we put the same redline paranoia into that as we do D-0 then it wouldn't.
With all the call to actions out there we need one that completely eliminates ESA's and provides those exemptions for bona fide service animals only, which could include the equivalent of ESA's but they'd have to be trained and actually documented to the same standard. Otherwise they go in a crate and if too large to fit under the seat then they go in the bin. At that point its on us to step it up and guarantee their care and there's no reason there can't be accurate temperature monitoring and even picture tracking sent to people's phones especially when sometimes it costs more than a transcon loss leader ticket anyway.
ESA's have become the universal life church equivalent of "ordained ministers" and it needs to be walked back.
#33
Even service animals cannot be placed in the passenger compartment unless they can be secured as cargo. The airline is required to make a reasonable accommodation, which could include putting said person and animal up against a fuselage-seat bulkhead non-emergency row, if it exists, but unless that is possible, or it fits under the seat in front or is lap-child size and can be held a such, it's against 14 CFR to put it in the cabin. There is a cutout in the ADA for safety:
https://www.transportation.gov/airco...s-disabilities
https://www.transportation.gov/indiv...upport-animals
They are also not required to comply with exotic/ridiculous requests like peacocks and pigs.
Placing an animal that can't be secured as cargo in the cabin would be contrary to safety. It's more egregious if you put this person on an asile or middle seat, blocking the fuselage-side seat(s) from being able to egress in an emergency.
The ESA thing is ridiculous, but it seems that this is "passed off" by the controls that should be in place to prevent it, such as ticket agents, gate agents, and the last line of defense, the flight attendants, which it should never get to, except in rare circumstances. Until airlines take those controls seriously and provide training and enforcement, this is going to continue.
Airlines may exclude anyone from a flight if carrying the person would be inimical to the safety of the flight
https://www.transportation.gov/indiv...upport-animals
They are also not required to comply with exotic/ridiculous requests like peacocks and pigs.
Placing an animal that can't be secured as cargo in the cabin would be contrary to safety. It's more egregious if you put this person on an asile or middle seat, blocking the fuselage-side seat(s) from being able to egress in an emergency.
The ESA thing is ridiculous, but it seems that this is "passed off" by the controls that should be in place to prevent it, such as ticket agents, gate agents, and the last line of defense, the flight attendants, which it should never get to, except in rare circumstances. Until airlines take those controls seriously and provide training and enforcement, this is going to continue.
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
The ESA thing is ridiculous, but it seems that this is "passed off" by the controls that should be in place to prevent it, such as ticket agents, gate agents, and the last line of defense, the flight attendants, which it should never get to, except in rare circumstances. Until airlines take those controls seriously and provide training and enforcement, this is going to continue.
IMO we need to put these checks at screening. Differencs between airlines are minuscule and at the very least make it the largest of any allowed carry ons. If it doesn't fit, you can't bring it. It would be self correcting instantly and even end up being less work for TSA as they wouldn't have to deal with it in the first place.
#36
A few years ago my wife was attacked by a dog in our old neighborhood. One of these 70 lb dogs that would never hurt a fly and loves the kids and blah blah blah, dog broke free from the 80 lb kid walking it and ran 4 houses down to my wife was walking down the street. She put her arm up to protect her face and he chomped in to her arm requiring stitches.
By georgia law that really isnt a problem. You need to catch the dog on video the animal control officer admitted. The owner was given a warning.
I really have a low tolerance for dogs now. And funny you mentioned home depot, a few years ago my 3 year old and I were walking in a home depot and she turned the corner ahead of me and came face to face with a large pit being walked by a clueless young woman on a long leash. Never considered someone would bring a dog into a home depot.
Pit owners love their dogs, I understand that to a point. But they're not the ones who deal the rest of their lives with their face being mauled. Well. Except maybe the ones killed by their pits.
If my family member was attacked by a dog on a delta flight I'm suing the **** out of the owner and delta.
By georgia law that really isnt a problem. You need to catch the dog on video the animal control officer admitted. The owner was given a warning.
I really have a low tolerance for dogs now. And funny you mentioned home depot, a few years ago my 3 year old and I were walking in a home depot and she turned the corner ahead of me and came face to face with a large pit being walked by a clueless young woman on a long leash. Never considered someone would bring a dog into a home depot.
Pit owners love their dogs, I understand that to a point. But they're not the ones who deal the rest of their lives with their face being mauled. Well. Except maybe the ones killed by their pits.
If my family member was attacked by a dog on a delta flight I'm suing the **** out of the owner and delta.
Around here, the Police (or Sheriff's department, if you live "out in the county") are adamant about taking the reports to put the owner "on notice". They have a "two bite" rule around here, and after the first incident, it seems owners are much more careful because of the consequences.
I was out eating one night, and this lady comes in with a HUGE dog. It just jumps up on the serving counter, and she not only let it do that, but did nothing to remove it. Probably violated a dozen health codes. The employees just shrugged it off, gave her the food, and when she left, proceeded to bleach down the entire counter (that's a lovely aroma when you're trying to eat).
It's not just the airlines, it's everywhere. It happens because people let it happen.
#38
Someone please try and share how a goose supports a human emotionally. LOL...
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,724
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post