Search
Notices

Dickson and ALPA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-2019, 03:15 PM
  #111  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: The Beginnings
Posts: 1,317
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
She is certainly deadset against commuters getting PS to work and feels it’s a huge safety issue. She also believes it counts as duty time under FAR117 and Delta is in violation of FAR117 when PS is granted.
It's a reasonable argument. (But for lawyers, not line pilots, to make. Big difference)

A big fear when the Part 117 rules were being hashed out was that commuting to work was going to be counted as effectively "on duty." It was initially proposed, but retracted due to the virtual elimination of pilots being able to commute to work on their own time. Pilots would pretty much have to live in base....a huge can of worms for so many reasons.

Fatigue was cited as a contributing factor in the Colgan Air crash that spurred the Part 117 rules. The copilot had been (legally) commuting for long hours into position before reporting for duty.

The flying public would be appalled to know that it's perfectly legal for pilots to commute all night, sleep a couple hours in a crew room, slam back some coffee, then fly a 13 hour scheduled day. As long as they state, "Why no, I'm not fatigued. Not at all."
deltabound is offline  
Old 07-14-2019, 03:38 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,399
Default

Originally Posted by deltabound View Post
It's a reasonable argument. (But for lawyers, not line pilots, to make. Big difference)

A big fear when the Part 117 rules were being hashed out was that commuting to work was going to be counted as effectively "on duty." It was initially proposed, but retracted due to the virtual elimination of pilots being able to commute to work on their own time. Pilots would pretty much have to live in base....a huge can of worms for so many reasons.

Fatigue was cited as a contributing factor in the Colgan Air crash that spurred the Part 117 rules. The copilot had been (legally) commuting for long hours into position before reporting for duty.

The flying public would be appalled to know that it's perfectly legal for pilots to commute all night, sleep a couple hours in a crew room, slam back some coffee, then fly a 13 hour scheduled day. As long as they state, "Why no, I'm not fatigued. Not at all."
It's also perfectly legal for a non-commuter to be up half the night with a crying infant, have an 0600 report, meaning he or she is waking up at 4 (not even including said crying baby), get stuck on I-285 after a tractor trailer jackknifes, and then fly a long duty day, with a few swigs of coffee to keep them going.

We can always find statistical outliers. At some point we have to be able to grant a pilot the benefit of the doubt regarding their own rest state and fitness for duty.
Herkflyr is offline  
Old 07-14-2019, 04:13 PM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr View Post
It's also perfectly legal for a non-commuter to be up half the night with a crying infant, have an 0600 report, meaning he or she is waking up at 4 (not even including said crying baby), get stuck on I-285 after a tractor trailer jackknifes, and then fly a long duty day, with a few swigs of coffee to keep them going.

We can always find statistical outliers. At some point we have to be able to grant a pilot the benefit of the doubt regarding their own rest state and fitness for duty.
She wasnt an infant. She told me she was 18!......

Cheers....J Epstein.
BobZ is offline  
Old 07-14-2019, 05:11 PM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr View Post
It's also perfectly legal for a non-commuter to be up half the night with a crying infant, have an 0600 report, meaning he or she is waking up at 4 (not even including said crying baby), get stuck on I-285 after a tractor trailer jackknifes, and then fly a long duty day, with a few swigs of coffee to keep them going.

We can always find statistical outliers. At some point we have to be able to grant a pilot the benefit of the doubt regarding their own rest state and fitness for duty.
But then why count front end deadheads as duty?
OOfff is offline  
Old 07-14-2019, 05:45 PM
  #115  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ View Post
She wasnt an infant. I made her tell me she was 18!......

Cheers....J Epstein.
FIFY.........
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 07-14-2019, 05:47 PM
  #116  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr View Post
It's also perfectly legal for a non-commuter to be up half the night with a crying infant, have an 0600 report, meaning he or she is waking up at 4 (not even including said crying baby), get stuck on I-285 after a tractor trailer jackknifes, and then fly a long duty day, with a few swigs of coffee to keep them going.

We can always find statistical outliers. At some point we have to be able to grant a pilot the benefit of the doubt regarding their own rest state and fitness for duty.
I'd been lucky with all 3 of mine if I had ever gotten a half nights sleep before work. Im kind of glad I don't know how little it was and how long the longest bit of sleep even got to.

And I live in base.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 07-15-2019, 03:23 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,314
Default

Let me first say I have commuted most of my career. The standard argument that pilots who live in base can be just as fatigued as commuters really does not carry much weight. Yes there are many reasons someone can be tired before a trip. Commuters have all the exact same issues as pilots living in base AND they have to commute to work.
I think commuting is safe when properly managed just like living in base. The problems come from a minority of commuters who choose to do things like catch a all-nighter from HNL to LAX to connect LAX to ATL and start a 6 day international trip. We are one accident away from the end of commuting as we know it because a minority of commuters can’t do it responsibly.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 07-15-2019, 04:20 AM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,399
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Let me first say I have commuted most of my career. The standard argument that pilots who live in base can be just as fatigued as commuters really does not carry much weight. Yes there are many reasons someone can be tired before a trip. Commuters have all the exact same issues as pilots living in base AND they have to commute to work.

I think commuting is safe when properly managed just like living in base. The problems come from a minority of commuters who choose to do things like catch a all-nighter from HNL to LAX to connect LAX to ATL and start a 6 day international trip. We are one accident away from the end of commuting as we know it because a minority of commuters can’t do it responsibly.
As someone who has commuted and lived in base, I agree. You make good points.
Herkflyr is offline  
Old 07-15-2019, 05:43 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,066
Default

I've done both. Now, I choose to live in base because my QOL is light yeas ahead of when I commuted. I got in to this career partly because I could live anywhere. After marriage and kids my priorities changed. I don't think anyone should be forced to live in base but rest is everyone's individual responsibility, both before reporting and after. I do think it's the out layer who will ruin it for everyone if/when.
notEnuf is offline  
Old 07-15-2019, 06:29 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by marcal View Post
M comment on this issue from another thread:

"After reading that, I would have pulled her from the line for mental testing as well. Why? Bc she’s as senior as it gets and decided to make a mountain out of a molehill by going so high up in the chain with pretty baseless accusations, ie no safety reporting? She mentioned a few “incidents” that could have been worse and while correct, we were trained in each CQ cycle as well as safety bulletins, etc. regarding them. Based on her blogs and books, it’s obvious she wanted(wants) to build a name for herself. The fact that she is going after management pay for lack of interviews for a position is galling. She knew this would only lead to problems and if she didn’t than she doesn’t have the SA that I want in a pilot upfront. She should have been filling out ASAPs and FCRs on her NRT layovers, not running from department to department screaming “fire” where there really is none."
The problem is, the correct action would be a personnel action against said employee, whether a sanction, suspension, or termination, not a mental health evaluation and pull from flight duty. This is a discipline and behavior issue. If said employee wants to then pull the mental health card after that action, they would be more than welcome, as that would automatically remove them from flying duty by their own accord. The more and more I hear about this story, the more it sounds like a befuddled/hasty attempt to "silence" an employee, without understanding or thinking about the repercussions.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flogger
SkyWest
445
05-08-2019 05:44 PM
Pushta Ailsouth
Delta
8
08-05-2018 05:46 PM
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices