Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Senior Leadership: Outsourcing is Cheaper >

Senior Leadership: Outsourcing is Cheaper

Search
Notices

Senior Leadership: Outsourcing is Cheaper

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2019, 04:11 AM
  #191  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane View Post
Ok, looking at that chart AF/KLM combined are more than Delta. I know they are not a merged carrier but aren’t they essentially one company?

Denny
They have more transatlantic flying than Delta but that includes all their flights to Canada, South/Central America and the Caribbean.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 11-28-2019, 04:12 AM
  #192  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by saturn View Post
No that's not my argument, Delta is #1. I've already seen that chart Trip7 posted. I'm happy and proud that we fly as much as we do to Europe. I'm just giving rationality and context to the claim of "we're #1". It's a poor way to measure EU carriers individually compared to US airlines. That doesn't take away anything from us or them.

Realistically how many destinations could KLM from AMS fly to the USA+Canada vs a US Airline fly from multiple hubs and focus cities to the whole of Europe? Yet BA flies to 27 US cities, KLM 12. When including Canada and LatAm, BA has 52, KLM 35. I find that quite impressive since it's basically from 1 home airport.

Most European airlines have either a singular airport or just a few to launch flights to just USA & Canada. It's logical that a US airline would have more TATL flying just in the finite view of continent vs continent. How about IAG or AF/KLM, Norwegian Group, etc vs DL, UA or AA?
You omit Central and South America which are in their transatlantic totals. They are huge markets.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 11-28-2019, 07:48 AM
  #193  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,815
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
They have more transatlantic flying than Delta but that includes all their flights to Canada, South/Central America and the Caribbean.
Does the same chart include our flying to Africa/India/ME?
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 11-28-2019, 07:51 AM
  #194  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SaltyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Leftof longitudinal
Posts: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by Aviator147 View Post
And what are we as a group gonna do about it....?
More Scope?
SaltyDog is offline  
Old 11-28-2019, 01:44 PM
  #195  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano View Post
Does the same chart include our flying to Africa/India/ME?
It would include our Africa and Middle East flying. We are expected to have around 72 flights a day just to Europe next summer.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 11-28-2019, 09:07 PM
  #196  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 442
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop View Post
In this regard I just read something about Norwegian Air cutting back a lot of their long haul flights to the US and elsewhere.

This could be good news if their scheme to cherry pick rules and regulations from various countries of convenience is failing.

Scoop
The Norwegian planes that currently fly to the US are not NAI. NAI only has 737s and doesn’t fly to the US anymore (they did from 2017 until earlier in 2019).The Norwegian subsidiaries that do widebody/long haul flying and do fly here are not flag of convenience carriers...they are regular Euro airlines that follow all labor and tax laws. ALPA thus far has specifically only mentioned NAI (so far as I’m aware), not the other Norwegian subsidiaries, as a threat to US jobs...and since they aren’t flying here anymore the threat has abated...for now.

Their parent company is obviously the same and is the root of the problem...so in that regard their overall demise may be a welcome bit of karma for Bjorn Kjos’s skirting labor/tax/whatever laws with NAI. But not all Norwegian subsidiaries are the same. And specifically, the long haul/US flights are not (currently) part of the problem and are really no different than any other European airline.

And with regards to your 2nd paragraph, their scheme to cherry pick rules from various countries isn’t really failing, it’s their rapid growth and buying a ton of expensive airplanes they can’t consistently fill on leisure routes on seasonal markets with low ticket prices that’s causing their financial woes. If their business plan was a bit better and their growth more measured, their scheme may be a longer term threat. And if they go away, that’s not to say their scheme necessarily will if someone else revives it. Or if they were to keep NAI and liquidate the parent company or some of the other subsidiaries (kind of like Condor continues to exist while Thomas Cook ceased operations).

I’m certainly not defending Norwegian’s (NAI specific) labor practices by any means, but I do think it’s important to know the differences between NAI and the other Norwegian subsidiaries and who the threat is.
jamesholzhauer is offline  
Old 12-07-2019, 03:35 AM
  #197  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,504
Default

sailing, i apologize, i just heard this week that the high density plan on the 'T" airplanes was scrapped.
tunes is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OOTSK
Major
2
11-07-2007 10:22 AM
bla bla bla
Regional
14
11-02-2006 07:29 AM
FX Bone Guy
Cargo
0
06-14-2006 08:51 AM
WatchThis!
Hangar Talk
0
10-07-2005 02:15 PM
CRM1337
Hangar Talk
0
05-04-2005 06:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices