Search

Notices

Road to the TA 20-02

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2020 | 06:27 AM
  #21  
Der Meister's Avatar
Line Holder
15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 930
Likes: 11
From: 320A
Default

Originally Posted by PilotWombat
So, a question to all of you that don't like the MBCBP (I'm still undecided, and will likely remain so until something concrete comes out). Clearly the 401k isn't adequate, so what is your proposal? What other company-sponsered options exist that allow us to shelter our retirement contributions from taxes now that you would find acceptable?
Currently there is no other option, so tax me and I'll do with it as I please.
Reply
Old 01-25-2020 | 06:47 AM
  #22  
Trip7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,130
Likes: 185
Default

Originally Posted by PilotWombat
So, a question to all of you that don't like the MBCBP (I'm still undecided, and will likely remain so until something concrete comes out). Clearly the 401k isn't adequate, so what is your proposal? What other company-sponsered options exist that allow us to shelter our retirement contributions from taxes now that you would find acceptable?
Top Hat is one that comes to mind

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/top-hat-plan.asp

Senior pilots can defer their pay until after retirement. Taxed less due to lower income bracket.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 01-25-2020 | 06:50 AM
  #23  
DWC CAP10 USAF's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Air Force
Liked
5 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 3,971
Likes: 178
From: Looking left
Default

I did reach out to the NC and asked about the cost of the MBCPB. I was told is does NOT comprise the bulk of the C2019 total ask and while it does have a cost, it does sunset off the company books eventually.

I was also told the NC is well aware that we want QOL improvement and those QOL improvments will remain well after the min balaance goes away.

Lastly the NC highlighted the fact that the MBCBP and the Minimum Balance are two very separate items which in no way require one or the other. They think the confusion lies in that the most tax efficient place to put a minimum balance would be in a MBCBP, but in no way does the Min Balance require a MBCBP and a MBCBP does not at all require a Min Balance. Two separate topics.
Reply
Old 01-25-2020 | 06:59 AM
  #24  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Top Hat is one that comes to mind

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/top-hat-plan.asp

Senior pilots can defer their pay until after retirement. Taxed less due to lower income bracket.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
From the article “ However, contributions to top hat plans such as non-governmental 457(b) plans are immediately taxable.” That sounds to me like you are taxed on it when it goes into the plan.

Denny
Reply
Old 01-25-2020 | 07:32 AM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by PilotWombat
So, a question to all of you that don't like the MBCBP (I'm still undecided, and will likely remain so until something concrete comes out). Clearly the 401k isn't adequate, so what is your proposal? What other company-sponsered options exist that allow us to shelter our retirement contributions from taxes now that you would find acceptable?
Depending on your age and previous savings I would not agree that the 401k isn't adequate, but that is a larger discussion.

The problem with the MBCBP is that you have no individual control. You are lumped into a group plan with a conservative target growth. And on top of that there surely will be high fees to the administrator who probably will select expensive funds. Additionally, the plan is not optional. It's a defined benefit plan which is mandatory until the IRS says otherwise. We are supposed to trust that this will happen. Just wait until the details are out, it will be fine!

There really aren't other long term tax deferred options, and that is fine. You have to pay taxes on income at some point, your goal should be to even out your exposure. If you need more retirement savings after maxing you 401k, you're better off with a taxable investment account or real estate. The extremely wealthy in this country do exactly that, they invest in real estate/businesses/securities and pay capital gains taxes which relatively speaking are cheap.

Just give me my money. Then I can invest it where I want based on my risk tolerance and short/long term needs.
Reply
Old 01-25-2020 | 08:24 AM
  #26  
Tailhookah's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 794
Likes: 2
From: Widget Jet
Default

Originally Posted by Funk
This one topic: the MBCBP, is why I’ve asked my LEC reps about details of what was actually proposed to the company. I support the four pillars for contract improvements, but I don’t want something like this, on which they won’t openly discuss the cost, nor will they discuss why it hasn’t been specifically polled amongst the pilot group (“we polled on retirement issues”) holding the rest of the contract negotiations hostage. I’m not happy with the reported behavior of the company either: no openers on some of the most substantial sections, no counters to our openers in those sections, and a big say vs do gap, ie “we ran too lean this last summer and we won’t do that again” vs pace of onboarding looks a lot like preparation for an instant replay of staffing levels of last summer (with the possibility that some within the company think they’ll have things better balanced between categories, so it’ll be OK).

The pilot group writ large is being treated like mushrooms, kept in the dark and fed a lot of . . . You get the idea.
I would recommend you talk to your reps. We need more than just a higher DC percentage. It’s because we make a lot. So the MBCBP allows us high earners to have a secondary tax haven to protect our money. There are rules and the MBCBP is that vehicle. It’s naive to read where some of you say you want the money and you’ll do what you want. That’s fiscally irresponsible and ignorant. You’ll not be able to outpace the taxes and return that the MBCBP will provide.

And the way this this country is going, I expect our 401k max contributions will someday soon be lowered to something around 40k from the current 58k due to our esteemed Reps in the DC swamp thinking we make too much and they enact a tax on the rich. That’s us. That hidden tax will lower our tax savings under current 401k rules. Most of America won’t care because they don’t get close to their limits.

When that hat happens our MBCBP will absorb our money above the new lower limit and protect us from our own swamp rats that are trying to hose us in DC.

The MBCBP is a great vehicle for those who are smart and get it.
Reply
Old 01-25-2020 | 08:28 AM
  #27  
Trip7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,130
Likes: 185
Default

Originally Posted by Tailhookah
I would recommend you talk to your reps. We need more than just a higher DC percentage. It’s because we make a lot. So the MBCBP allows us high earners to have a secondary tax haven to protect our money. There are rules and the MBCBP is that vehicle. It’s naive to read where some of you say you want the money and you’ll do what you want. That’s fiscally irresponsible and ignorant. You’ll not be able to outpace the taxes and return that the MBCBP will provide.



And the way this this country is going, I expect our 401k max contributions will someday soon be lowered to something around 40k from the current 58k due to our esteemed Reps in the DC swamp thinking we make too much and they enact a tax on the rich. That’s us. That hidden tax will lower our tax savings under current 401k rules. Most of America won’t care because they don’t get close to their limits.



When that hat happens our MBCBP will absorb our money above the new lower limit and protect us from our own swamp rats that are trying to hose us in DC.



The MBCBP is a great vehicle for those who are smart and get it.
Please show your Math on how you think pilots will not be able to outpace the after tax returns of the MBCBP

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 01-25-2020 | 08:38 AM
  #28  
Tailhookah's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 794
Likes: 2
From: Widget Jet
Default

There aren’t other plans that will work for our group. The MBCBP is in addition to the 401k. It’s used by corporate America’s executive class and is a great tax haven for contributions above the 401k limits. Those limits will most likely change for the worse as liberal America will expect us rich Americans to pay for their fiscal irresponsibility with the blessing of ignorant and irresponsible America.

Wake up Deltoids. This is a good vehicle. It’s not the same as the 401k and has limits. The taxes saved and sheltered until retirement with a conservative return will far outpace what any of us would be able to do without massive luck.

Anyone can can make money in the market now. It’s when this run up ends is when all you “Warren Buffets” out there will get your lunch handed to you.

Be smart. If you don’t believe me, engage a rep who’s versed on this. Most of you need to do that and from what I’ve read most are wrong and don’t understand the limits we are under. The potential tax hike with the 401k limits dropping we face. And the beauty of the high earner MBCBP will be for us.

Im just Joe. The line pilot. But I’ve done my due diligence. Some of you need to put down the crack pipe and research this smartly.
Reply
Old 01-25-2020 | 08:38 AM
  #29  
PilotWombat's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 643
Likes: 13
From: Currently freeloading
Default

Ok, so I've been going through the numbers. Of course I have to make a lot of assumptions:
  • No state tax, 24% tax bracket during your career, 22% in retirement, 15% capital gains tax rate
  • 5% interest in the MBCBP, 8% return on your own investments
  • Buy an annuity with the MBCBP total, returned at 6% per year
  • Distributions on your own investments at 4%
With those assumptions and more, it will take 28 years for your own investments to provide more income than the MBCBP. At a 9% return, 22 years. Those numbers stretch are 31 and 24 years respectively with a 5% state income tax.

So I guess if your retirement horizon is more than 30 years out, then it's in your best interest to not have the MBCBP. If it's sooner than that, the MBCCBP is the better option.

Depending on your age and previous savings I would not agree that the 401k isn't adequate, but that is a larger discussion.
I guess I shouldn't say "adequate". Fully tax advantaged, maybe.
Reply
Old 01-25-2020 | 08:44 AM
  #30  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,413
Likes: 413
Default

Originally Posted by Tailhookah
It’s naive to read where some of you say you want the money and you’ll do what you want.

That’s fiscally irresponsible and ignorant. You’ll not be able to outpace the taxes and return that the MBCBP will provide.

The MBCBP is a great vehicle for those who are smart and get it.
Wow, those are some pretty arrogant comments. I have no doubt people who said the pension would always be there and that you didnt need it in your own name, were all pretty confident they were right as well...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pilot36
Pilot Health
7
05-31-2012 09:12 AM
fdxdispatchguy
Cargo
28
10-19-2011 02:37 PM
vagabond
Major
6
12-23-2007 05:06 PM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
0
11-23-2005 01:12 PM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
0
11-23-2005 01:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices