The Question of “Optional”
#71
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 177
Just because you have no desire to invest in rental properties does not mean we should all be forced to accept a sub-par ROI. Also (not necessarily directed at you planetrain), but just because we're opposed to this plan, doesn't mean we think we're investment mavens. We just have a different investment strategy we'd like to pursue and this plan (as shown so far) goes against my current strategy. Honestly, it doesn't take an investing genius to beat 5% (long term) with real estate. At the end of the day, we all have one vote....I'll cast my vote and accept the outcome.
Ive seen some really smart accountants lose their shirt on the rental condo at the beach... (But at least they get the coveted January week to use for themselves when the unit is empty!)
I have a friend that after 7 years, liquidated and broke-even on his rental properties...
I have family that are real estate professionals that have had their rentals destroyed by their tenets (including one pouring cement down the toilets when they were evicted by the sheriff after many months of non-payment)...
And I’ve had an ol captain absolutely killing it on slum landlording in urban Atlanta. (He sends his wife to the door to collect payment!)
There are those that do really really well with rentals and don’t mind fixing problems (or paying others to manage) and I can’t fault anybody for wanting to pursue maximum retirement money. It’s just not for me.
#72
More power to you on rental properties.
Ive seen some really smart accountants lose their shirt on the rental condo at the beach... (But at least they get the coveted January week to use for themselves when the unit is empty!)
I have a friend that after 7 years, liquidated and broke-even on his rental properties...
I have family that are real estate professionals that have had their rentals destroyed by their tenets (including one pouring cement down the toilets when they were evicted by the sheriff after many months of non-payment)...
And I’ve had an ol captain absolutely killing it on slum landlording in urban Atlanta. (He sends his wife to the door to collect payment!)
There are those that do really really well with rentals and don’t mind fixing problems (or paying others to manage) and I can’t fault anybody for wanting to pursue maximum retirement money. It’s just not for me.
Ive seen some really smart accountants lose their shirt on the rental condo at the beach... (But at least they get the coveted January week to use for themselves when the unit is empty!)
I have a friend that after 7 years, liquidated and broke-even on his rental properties...
I have family that are real estate professionals that have had their rentals destroyed by their tenets (including one pouring cement down the toilets when they were evicted by the sheriff after many months of non-payment)...
And I’ve had an ol captain absolutely killing it on slum landlording in urban Atlanta. (He sends his wife to the door to collect payment!)
There are those that do really really well with rentals and don’t mind fixing problems (or paying others to manage) and I can’t fault anybody for wanting to pursue maximum retirement money. It’s just not for me.
Investing in Real Estate Private Equity: An Insider's Guide to Real Estate Partnerships, Funds, Joint Ventures & Crowdfunding https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01IW0G0S0..._pf4mEb1XCQ0J5
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
#73
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
More power to you on rental properties.
Ive seen some really smart accountants lose their shirt on the rental condo at the beach... (But at least they get the coveted January week to use for themselves when the unit is empty!)
I have a friend that after 7 years, liquidated and broke-even on his rental properties...
I have family that are real estate professionals that have had their rentals destroyed by their tenets (including one pouring cement down the toilets when they were evicted by the sheriff after many months of non-payment)...
And I’ve had an ol captain absolutely killing it on slum landlording in urban Atlanta. (He sends his wife to the door to collect payment!)
There are those that do really really well with rentals and don’t mind fixing problems (or paying others to manage) and I can’t fault anybody for wanting to pursue maximum retirement money. It’s just not for me.
Ive seen some really smart accountants lose their shirt on the rental condo at the beach... (But at least they get the coveted January week to use for themselves when the unit is empty!)
I have a friend that after 7 years, liquidated and broke-even on his rental properties...
I have family that are real estate professionals that have had their rentals destroyed by their tenets (including one pouring cement down the toilets when they were evicted by the sheriff after many months of non-payment)...
And I’ve had an ol captain absolutely killing it on slum landlording in urban Atlanta. (He sends his wife to the door to collect payment!)
There are those that do really really well with rentals and don’t mind fixing problems (or paying others to manage) and I can’t fault anybody for wanting to pursue maximum retirement money. It’s just not for me.
#75
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
From: 717
Actually, you do cede that 16% will be automatically put in the 401k and there is nothing you can do about it until it is maxed out or you hit $285,000 in pay. Just an FYI
#76
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
#77
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
#78
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,132
Likes: 92
I don't use the brokerage side... can folks not control pretty broadly where and how that money is invested?
#79
Right? I also don't prepay college tuition or have pet health insurance but I guess I'm kind of an idiot.
#80
I haven’t had the time to do this math..... maybe someone else can.
We have 60%+ of guys hitting the 401C max currently. Take 16% above the 285k number (tax bracket here) and invest it at 9% for 5/10/15/25 years. Compare that to 16% above the 285k number and tax defer the same amount at 5% for 5/10/15/25. So almost half the growth but 16% deferred vs the idea of 100% post tax (60%ish best case) being invested with compounding. Paying the tax later vs in highest earning years may be huge. Don’t have the time to do the math and illustrate right now. Just say a guy makes $300k, married, a couple kids, and 10% PS with a max out of 401K contributions. Don’t even mess with catchups in the math.
Show those numbers. The real question becomes simple. If we can defer taxes now for roughly 50% of annualized and historical return- is it worth it. Optional, fine, but where is the “line” of things making sense by known numbers now and historical returns.
Please compute.
We have 60%+ of guys hitting the 401C max currently. Take 16% above the 285k number (tax bracket here) and invest it at 9% for 5/10/15/25 years. Compare that to 16% above the 285k number and tax defer the same amount at 5% for 5/10/15/25. So almost half the growth but 16% deferred vs the idea of 100% post tax (60%ish best case) being invested with compounding. Paying the tax later vs in highest earning years may be huge. Don’t have the time to do the math and illustrate right now. Just say a guy makes $300k, married, a couple kids, and 10% PS with a max out of 401K contributions. Don’t even mess with catchups in the math.
Show those numbers. The real question becomes simple. If we can defer taxes now for roughly 50% of annualized and historical return- is it worth it. Optional, fine, but where is the “line” of things making sense by known numbers now and historical returns.
Please compute.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
22
02-27-2009 12:04 PM



