Delta To Furlough?
#331
Banned
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
From: Gummed
So this particular guy losing a defamation lawsuit negates what NOAA, the DoD and hundreds of other agencies say about anthropogenic climate change, and the threat it poses. I hope, for my kids sake, you’re right and this is a giant hoax. In the meantime I’ll keep believing the 99% instead of fishing around for the 1% that makes me feel good.
Short answer. Yes. They all bought into the hype based on Dr Mann's now infamous CO2 hockey stick graph. You know, inertia and all.
Over 250 climatologists, meteorologists, and physicists (PhD level) had been rebuking Mann's graph because he falsified his data. They had proof. They called him on it. They knew Mann was agenda driven not science driven. He didn't like it, so he sued them for libel - actually he went after the leader Dr Ball.
Your kids are gonna be fine - never was an issue as it was all made up to begin with (see the court case).
"hundreds of other agencies" please, that does not lend credence to your argument when their actions are based on a lie. Ever wonder why the MSM has not mentioned this case? Hmmm? ever think about that?
Not about the feelz, it's about the truth.
Last edited by Phins2right; 03-08-2020 at 03:27 PM.
#332
He's not a particular "guy". He's THE source that Al Gore and the rest of the CO2 global warming cabal used to justify their actions and punitive plans. You need to research this more. Do your homework.
Short answer. Yes. They all bought into the hype based on Dr Mann's now infamous CO2 hockey stick graph. You know, inertia and all.
Over 250 climatologists, meteorologists, and physicists (PhD level) had been rebuking Mann's graph because he falsified his data. They had proof. They called him on it. They knew Mann was agenda driven not science driven. He didn't like it, so he sued them for libel - actually he went after the leader Dr Ball.
Your kids are gonna be fine - never was an issue as it was all made up to begin with (see the court case).
"hundreds of other agencies" please, that does not lend credence to your argument when their actions are based on a lie. Ever wonder why the MSM has not mentioned this case? Hmmm? ever think about that?
Not about the feelz, it's about the truth.
Short answer. Yes. They all bought into the hype based on Dr Mann's now infamous CO2 hockey stick graph. You know, inertia and all.
Over 250 climatologists, meteorologists, and physicists (PhD level) had been rebuking Mann's graph because he falsified his data. They had proof. They called him on it. They knew Mann was agenda driven not science driven. He didn't like it, so he sued them for libel - actually he went after the leader Dr Ball.
Your kids are gonna be fine - never was an issue as it was all made up to begin with (see the court case).
"hundreds of other agencies" please, that does not lend credence to your argument when their actions are based on a lie. Ever wonder why the MSM has not mentioned this case? Hmmm? ever think about that?
Not about the feelz, it's about the truth.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
#333
Banned
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
From: Gummed
Because you probably didn't know about him since you made this comment. He is the, no pun intended, "Mann". In the religion of climate change, he was your pope. Again, his graph was the genesis of your movement. Propelled by the prohets of Gore and the like. In the end, a movement based on a lie. Like I said to extenda, you need to do your homework.
#334
Banned
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
From: Gummed
#335
the guy who wrote that is a signatory to the Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming, which states:
“"We believe Earth and its ecosystems — created by God’s intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence — are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting, admirably suited for human flourishing, and displaying His glory. Earth's climate system is no exception."
a robust scientific viewpoint, indeed 🥴
“"We believe Earth and its ecosystems — created by God’s intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence — are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting, admirably suited for human flourishing, and displaying His glory. Earth's climate system is no exception."
a robust scientific viewpoint, indeed 🥴
Joe D’Aleo wrote it. Here’s his bio. The rebuttal is all science based. Read it. There’s no religious non science in any of it. Joe is very mainstream and fact based. Unlike the AGW crowd that has based all its arguments on CO2... which is a greenhouse gas. A trace gas that has limited influence on climate. Water vapor is by far way more robust in trapping heat. The IPCC crowd is based on temp records that have been changed to make today’s minor warmth more dramatic. And ALL of the AGW based models have been wrong. All of them. There’s clearly way more to it than CO2. Even by going back in time and putting in real data, the models all still fail.
And if I were wrong, we still have China, India and Brazil building coal plants like crazy and if the US went to zero emissions tomorrow, it wouldn’t matter one bit. We can ruin our economy and maybe see .2 or .3 cooling as a result... if I were wrong. I’m not.
Here is Joe’s bio. Read the rebuttal. Try to prove it wrong. You can’t.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_D%27Aleo
#336
Because you probably didn't know about him since you made this comment. He is the, no pun intended, "Mann". In the religion of climate change, he was your pope. Again, his graph was the genesis of your movement. Propelled by the prohets of Gore and the like. In the end, a movement based on a lie. Like I said to extenda, you need to do your homework.
#337
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
The ruling against Dr Mann - it's in the British Columbia Supreme Court case file. Go look it up it on their judgements website.
I bet, up until now, you had no idea about the case, the lawsuit Dr Mann brought against his critics, and the fact he got crushed by the court.
Also willing to bet you had no idea that there was a British Columbia Supreme Court, and that they have a judgements website.
Willful ignorance you say? Look in the mirror my friend.
I bet, up until now, you had no idea about the case, the lawsuit Dr Mann brought against his critics, and the fact he got crushed by the court.
Also willing to bet you had no idea that there was a British Columbia Supreme Court, and that they have a judgements website.
Willful ignorance you say? Look in the mirror my friend.
mann didn’t press the case forward and the judge said the delay negates the claim. THIS PROVES GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX!
#338
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Joe D’Aleo wrote it. Here’s his bio. The rebuttal is all science based. Read it. There’s no religious non science in any of it. Joe is very mainstream and fact based. Unlike the AGW crowd that has based all its arguments on CO2... which is a greenhouse gas. A trace gas that has limited influence on climate. Water vapor is by far way more robust in trapping heat. The IPCC crowd is based on temp records that have been changed to make today’s minor warmth more dramatic. And ALL of the AGW based models have been wrong. All of them. There’s clearly way more to it than CO2. Even by going back in time and putting in real data, the models all still fail.
And if I were wrong, we still have China, India and Brazil building coal plants like crazy and if the US went to zero emissions tomorrow, it wouldn’t matter one bit. We can ruin our economy and maybe see .2 or .3 cooling as a result... if I were wrong. I’m not.
Here is Joe’s bio. Read the rebuttal. Try to prove it wrong. You can’t.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_D%27Aleo
And if I were wrong, we still have China, India and Brazil building coal plants like crazy and if the US went to zero emissions tomorrow, it wouldn’t matter one bit. We can ruin our economy and maybe see .2 or .3 cooling as a result... if I were wrong. I’m not.
Here is Joe’s bio. Read the rebuttal. Try to prove it wrong. You can’t.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_D%27Aleo
#339
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 462
Likes: 8
Check out the new “go anywhere” function on Travelnet. Pick any hub, look 12-18 hours out. The numbers are pretty sobering as to the effect Coronavirus is having on our bookings. Very sobering actually.
#340
75 most of the time
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: 7ER B
I have been stalking the loads from Atlanta to Salt lake for awhile for a ski trip. A week ago all the flights for a particular day had an average of 8 open. Now the average is closer to 50.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



