Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Early Out,Retirement,Furlough Negotiation >

Early Out,Retirement,Furlough Negotiation

Search

Notices

Early Out,Retirement,Furlough Negotiation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2020, 04:40 AM
  #1441  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 240
Default

Originally Posted by Phins2right
You should be on your knees praying that you have those freedoms that you so like to continuously make fun of.


Finally, the numbers are being pulled from the CDC. It's going to Dr Carson's agency - where it belongs. Venture to say this will be the long dwindling end to the fear mongering.


Again, this so called lethal disease that you have to be tested to know you've had it. Seem funny to you?


Asymptomatic people. What better way to control the populace than to make literally everyone 'sick'.


It has been proven to be less lethal than the flu.


Suffer the consequences of your actions, because it has decimated the travel and leisure industry for no good reason. You cheerlead that destruction. Sick.


At the outset Faux-chi said over 2 million in the US would die. Wrong


At the outset he said over 100 million in the US would be infected - wrong.


At the outset he said we would run out of hospital space - wrong.

At the outset he said 15 days to flatten the curve, 30 days to control the spread. Wrong. We are over 120 days into it, and look where we are at. Goal posts moving all over the field. Its like they have ADD or something.


At the outset he said that there is no known cure - wrong. He endorsed HCQ back in 2005 for corona viruses, yet suddenly backpedaled this time around. HCQ has been now peer reviewed and PROVEN to not only cure, but prevent.


At the outset he said we would never have enough ventilators to support the amount of infected persons - wrong.


Faux-chi has been wrong on everything about this bug. Yet you jump on the band wagon supporting the shutdowns of economies and absolute ruination of entire blocks of industries around the globe. And you're happy with that. All to willing to rain thunder down on anyone who disagrees with the mask save lives don't kill my grandma crowd.


The largest mass murderer in the 21st century, Andrew Cuomo, is walking around a free man. You know him he;s the guy that ordered china virus infected patients into the most vulnerable of our population. Like he didn't know how that would turn out. He is touted for his "brilliance" in handling the outbreak in his state. Yet his state had the highest death count per capita of not only the US, but the world. Yet you ignorantly and smugly profess mask wear is the solution - which it is scientifically proven not to be.


It's people with your attitude that will mire us down from extracting us out of this situation. A vaccine is not going to change the dynamic. Especially when it is proven not to work against 99.5% of corona viruses. Moderna et al. are pimping a flu shot, nothing more.


Positive for the bug is not a death sentence for 99.9% of those that are infected. I like those odds. What's your problem?
the goal posts move as we learn more about Covid. It’s a bit scary to see how someone in a technical job can so quickly throw away science and want to follow talking points of politicians. Inaccurate ones at that.

i like science fiction writers myself...

https://www.quora.com/What-happens-i...b5f&srid=hfISX
cessnapilot is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 05:01 AM
  #1442  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,731
Default

Originally Posted by Iceberg
Uh oh. If they can do that, we should just get rid of the PWA altogether. After all, why have it if they can just declare bankruptcy and tell the judge they need to erase sections and reduce costs? Don’t bother resuming section 6, cuz bankruptcy!
Sounds like something that might have happened 14 years ago.
badflaps is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 05:12 AM
  #1443  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RonRicco's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Captain
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by cessnapilot
the goal posts move as we learn more about Covid. It’s a bit scary to see how someone in a technical job can so quickly throw away science and want to follow talking points of politicians. Inaccurate ones at that.

i like science fiction writers myself...

https://www.quora.com/What-happens-i...b5f&srid=hfISX
I know what you are saying and you aren’t going to find me using political talking points, but you have to admit that “science” isn’t math. Very few mathematicians argue if 2+2=4. Besides that, some of the “top docs” have been very inconsistent with their interpretation of the science and there are plenty of their peers with similar credentials that have different views.

Does science only matter when adhering to your docs opinion? If that is the case, then no one would never need a second opinion I guess.

And by the way “I believe in science” is now a political talking point.
RonRicco is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 06:01 AM
  #1444  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,168
Default

Originally Posted by deltabound
The ignore user post option is readily available.

With 5x the amount of postings in less than half the time I’ve been here that you’ve made (5000+ posts since 2015?!) I’m sure you know that.
This some how offends you? Or do you just want to be ignored? I spend a fair amount of time on APC because I can, especially now. As a contributor, you too can post as much or as little as you like, get to work if you feel its a contest. Should I register a new account for a lower post count like many here have? I was essentially agreeing with you, showing by hyperbole that there is no Delta sanctioned prevention except masks. And apparently the GA governor (the one who rigged the vote BTW, look actual trolling ) doesn't like our Delta mandate. BTW the governors new mask policy has everything to do with the Trump visit and not making Atlantins mask up on camera. A political favor.
notEnuf is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 06:33 AM
  #1445  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,558
Default

Originally Posted by badflaps
Sounds like something that might have happened 14 years ago.
You don’t say. I’ve done the bankruptcy game, I know how it works. I appreciate your perspective, I know you suffer from events 14 years ago. I don’t see a bankruptcy anytime soon with the cash flow and expenses they’re reporting right now, though. If we get to bankruptcy having mowed through 15b and are continuing to lose cash, the contract is gone and so is the company.

My point is, the argument to not change the PWA with any LOAs because of the potential for bankruptcy is ridiculous. We keep hearing how we shouldn’t change anything because it’ll just be thrown out in bankruptcy court, yet somehow the existing PWA is safe from this same court room shredding machine. But, it’s a new low starting point! Is it? We haven’t seen what they are even negotiating.
Iceberg is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 06:50 AM
  #1446  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,168
Default

Originally Posted by Iceberg
You don’t say. I’ve done the bankruptcy game, I know how it works. I appreciate your perspective, I know you suffer from events 14 years ago. I don’t see a bankruptcy anytime soon with the cash flow and expenses they’re reporting right now, though. If we get to bankruptcy having mowed through 15b and are continuing to lose cash, the contract is gone and so is the company.

My point is, the argument to not change the PWA with any LOAs because of the potential for bankruptcy is ridiculous. We keep hearing how we shouldn’t change anything because it’ll just be thrown out in bankruptcy court, yet somehow the existing PWA is safe from this same court room shredding machine. But, it’s a new low starting point! Is it? We haven’t seen what they are even negotiating.
LOAs during section 6 is not a good idea IMHO but if we do it, there has to be sweeteners and a snap back to get past MEMRAT. Everyone wants different sweeteners so I don't think it passes but the deal will not only have to sell itself but not harm our section 6 position.
notEnuf is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 08:00 AM
  #1447  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,534
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Ed says we can get to break even at 60% and that we still have our premium over the other domestic airlines. I think this will work just fine for us until confidence is restored. He said it’s not sustainable and there’s no illusion that it will continue indefinitely. It does build brand loyalty and require more pilots so I all for it until we get every airplane we have with the new fleet plan back in the sky. Have you been on DH in C+ lately? It’s great. I’m sure when people start traveling for business we will be the preferred airline. The problem is people have no reason to fly anywhere. No conferences, industry showcases, sports, shows, urban tourism etc. When the rest of travel returns people will book on Delta.
When the rest of travel returns no one will care that DL used to block 40%. That canot be, and will not be, a long term stratedgy. Not If we can build and maintain a consumer image for cleanliness that's cool as there will probably be a small carry forward premium for that. I highly doubt we have a 60% BELF, especially with yields taking a thrashing. As for being good for pilots, that's only the case if we add another flight. We don't and instead pay pax to stay as tons of empty seats leave.

I'd like to see the actual application of when we add another flight. If a flight is consistently at 60% due to our artificial cap, but the market would support 75% I doubt we add another flight for a net 15% LF on it. So while we may add some flights, the vast majority of the time I bet we simply turn pax away or worse...we pay them money. That's cool with a 105% LF making money hand over fist but that's not where we are.
gloopy is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 08:08 AM
  #1448  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,558
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
LOAs during section 6 is not a good idea IMHO but if we do it, there has to be sweeteners and a snap back to get past MEMRAT. Everyone wants different sweeteners so I don't think it passes but the deal will not only have to sell itself but not harm our section 6 position.
It may not get past the memory rat and that’s fine, that’s exactly why it’s required. My point is that maybe we oughta let the process play out and see what comes from it instead of shouting NO before anything is even known. Maybe it will be a win/win. Maybe short term pain that is made up for in the long term. Maybe it’s complete garbage. We don’t know, let’s find out before shooting it down.
Iceberg is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 08:11 AM
  #1449  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: I got into this business so I wouldn't have to work.
Posts: 1,034
Default

Originally Posted by Gspot
Hmmm. I don’t know. Let me go check my Twitter account. Nope, still don’t have one.

And let me go check my party affiliation. Nope, still don’t have one.

But I do have this, just for you.
Again, quite helpful. I wish we were all as superior as you, Gspeed!
Vincent Chase is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 08:22 AM
  #1450  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 140
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
I highly doubt we have a 60% BELF, especially with yields taking a thrashing.
We do not have a 60% BELF. We can generate cash at 60% load factor, but people (employees, leaders, and news media) get a little sloppy with words trying to explain things and it leads to a lot of confusion.
AUP09 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bender
Delta
405
04-19-2020 08:09 AM
L'il J.Seinfeld
Cargo
72
11-01-2011 02:55 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM
brownie
Cargo
200
03-05-2009 07:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices