Search
Notices

Not an outlier?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2020, 11:50 PM
  #161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by casual observer View Post
Here's why. Because the issue has been fabricated to get you to voluntarily abandon support for police and other institutions. That's what is happening tonight. Millions of people have been influenced to think it is right to tie the hands of police to prevent the injustice you've been convinced exists.

Eric Gardner, Mike Brown, Freddy Gray, Philando Castille, Walter Scott, there are more. They are the black victims of police homicide. They are almost household names. They have each had hundreds of hours of media coverage devoted to their story. But, twice as many white guys get killed by cops than black guys every year. Can you name one? The reason is that those deaths go unreported because if they were reported it would dilute the idea that America's Justice system is racist and illegitimate. A black Harvard professor who believed this narrative did a study but was surprised to find there was no evidence that police shot black men at a higher rate than other races:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...-harvard-prof/

If the idea is that American cops are racist, does it make sense that police kill 10 times more white men than black women?

If we insist that every person should be treated the same by police, why do we have national riots over the 2.5 to 1 disparity between black and white males, but the 10 to 1 disparity between males and females is never contemplated or not considered a problem at all? What's the difference?

Here's what happened. People that did not like the American status quo wanted you to believe that America is unjust. They wanted to use racial division to do that. Almost all crime is white on white or black on black. Because the crimes usually happen within communities. The only crime stat that indicates a interracial disparity where black people are over represented as victims is police homicide (all the other data on interracial crime, if anyone thought it was important, is overwhelmingly black on white). Even though the per capita disparity has dramatically improved over the last 50 years, the media choose to cover it like it was happening with increasing frequency. In a country of 330,000,000 only about 1,000 people are killed by police every year. I think about 500 white guys are killed and about 300 black guys are killed. The disparity comes when you realize that there are 6 times greater white population, so the per capita disparity becomes 2.5 to 1.


So, 300 black guys are killed in a country of a 20,000,000 black guys. I think I did the math once and it's more likely to die drowning or getting struck by lightning. Doesn't diminish what happen to George Floyd. He was murdered by a rogue cop that is going to jail for decades. But, spend some time thinking about why this is the issue that it has been the last 10 years, especially in light of much more significant totals of interracial crimes that never get reported at all. You probably wouldn't implicate all black people for the crime committed by one guy. Why would implicate all law enforcement by pointing to the actions of a small number of cops?

For context, there are about 20,000 interracial rapes every year. Rape is a horrible crime. Have you ever heard stats on that? Wonder why? I'm not saying it's important, but you should start wondering why you are only getting the kinds of information that has led many to think that what is happening tonight is understandable. It's not. It's manufactured for the purpose of destroying our institutions to replace them with something else. I don't believe the 'something else' will be better than what we (all of us) have had in the U.S. up to now.

P.S. This is interesting. It's 2016 info, but the Guardian in the U.K. highlights every U.S. police homicide. What's great about it is it shows a picture and brief description of each incident. Look through all the victims and read the descriptions and let me know if those victims match the narrative you have been led to believe by MSM in the U.S.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...gs-us-database
Maybe it's time to just listen to each other instead of insisting on being right, beforehand.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4EaYK2KoBs
newKnow is offline  
Old 06-01-2020, 12:00 AM
  #162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 770
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
Maybe it's time to just listen to each other instead of insisting on being right, beforehand.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4EaYK2KoBs
I love that video. The black guy is right. So are the white people. This is really America and the shiz in the media is cancerous propaganda.

Thanks for linking that. Must see.
casual observer is offline  
Old 06-01-2020, 12:13 AM
  #163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by casual observer View Post
I love that video. The black guy is right. So are the white people. This is really America and the shiz in the media is cancerous propaganda.

Thanks for linking that. Must see.

No Problem. We are all Americans.
newKnow is offline  
Old 06-01-2020, 03:33 AM
  #164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

So whats your point?

Somehow 1 election alters 100 preceeding years of democrat oppression in the south? Of jim crow and the klan?

using that logic....the germans were absolved of their nazi history with the election of willy brant that same year i guess.

I was alive for the election in 64.

And the Watts riots down the street from us a year later.

Another case of a democrat mayor. A democrat govenor. Police brutality. And resulting riots and destruction.

Sound familiar?

So you see...its not some link out of brittanica for me.

NYC riots 1964. Police brutality. Drmocrat mayor.

LA 1965..police brutality. Democrat mayor

chicago 1966. Democrat mayor.

Detroit 1967. Democrat mayor.

1992 LA..again. Police brutality. Democrat mayor.

Minneapolis 2020.....police brutality...Democrat mayor.

Are you getting the picture?

Last edited by BobZ; 06-01-2020 at 04:06 AM.
BobZ is offline  
Old 06-01-2020, 04:12 AM
  #165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley View Post
Fun facts of the day,
mappingpoliceviolence.org/unarmed
NAACP | Criminal Justice Fact Sheet
if you were to pull up abortion stats based on race you mite find the percentages correlation in disproportionate representation by race striking.

Progressive Democrat policies.

The clinton crime bill on one end, and the planned parenthood abortion factory on the other.
BobZ is offline  
Old 06-01-2020, 06:34 AM
  #166  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,191
Default

Originally Posted by GoodVibeRidez View Post
I have to believe that there are better ways to reduce our worldwide high Police involved killings AND Police dying in the line of duty.
Simple.....get people to abide by the laws of society voluntarily.

Impossible due the nature of man?

So then, due to the nature of man, those same police will occasionally go too far( especially when there are 800,000 law enforcement agents in America)


Or, you can just let rioters run amok, that seems to be working pretty well as far as reducing police brutality. No engagement.... no volatile confrontations!

I will say, at least all these mayors, where they are having civil unrest, stand by their principles. During CV19 it was/is.... "if we can save just 1 life, keep it locked down, economic costs be dammed".......now the mantra during civil unrest is(you guessed it...."if we can save just 1 life, don't engage let em loot, economic costs be dammed"

It is either a double dose of stoopid or shear genius.....I'll let the reader decide
Buck Rogers is offline  
Old 06-01-2020, 07:13 AM
  #167  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 762
Default


socialism

noun
Save Word
so·​cial·​ism | \ ˈsō-shə-ˌli-zəm \

Definition of socialism



1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2a: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism

Just throwing this out here, as some don’t seem to actually know what socialism is.
NE_Pilot is offline  
Old 06-01-2020, 07:31 AM
  #168  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Nvrgofullretard View Post
you just stated some pretty crazy “facts”.
source? (Fox or cnn doesn’t count)
I don't watch TV.

You should try reading, Hofstadter, Beard, etc, the great historians of the gilded age/progressive era. When progressives make a mistake, they simply shrug it off as, "not real (insert political idealogy here)".
Mesabah is online now  
Old 06-01-2020, 07:50 AM
  #169  
Gets Weekends Off
 
velosnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,170
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
I don't watch TV.

You should try reading, Hofstadter, Beard, etc, the great historians of the gilded age/progressive era. When progressives make a mistake, they simply shrug it off as, "not real (insert political idealogy here)".
But you didn't answer the question. What evidence do you have to support what amounts to yet another unfounded conspiracy?
velosnow is offline  
Old 06-01-2020, 08:01 AM
  #170  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,191
Default

Originally Posted by velosnow View Post
But you didn't answer the question. What evidence do you have to support what amounts to yet another unfounded conspiracy?
Would it really matter? After 3 years of investigations there was no “evidence” that Trump is Putin’s puppet. But ask any “democrat” if Trump is guilty of collusion and the answer is a resounding yes.

So the point is, “evidence” is not necessarily required to shape one’s beliefs

There is no evidence that George Floyd died of asphyxiation or trauma to the neck......does that matter? Does it change anything?
Buck Rogers is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices