1941
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 794
For anyone who cares, by the numbers management threw out last month, Delta currently has enough cash on hand to operate for 17 months. Being generous, keeping those 1941 pilots on UNA status costs roughly $1M a day. The difference between furloughing and not is about 20 days.
This does not include any sort of revenue increase or voluntary cost saving measures that could otherwise be implemented.
Let's be clear, Delta does not have to furlough. If they truly believed in their own values, they would have tried other measures before jumping straight to the nuclear option, or simply bit the bullet and tried keeping us on staff until things really get dire, working towards a future where things never get that far.
I, more than anything, am disappointed to have my cynicism confirmed.
This does not include any sort of revenue increase or voluntary cost saving measures that could otherwise be implemented.
Let's be clear, Delta does not have to furlough. If they truly believed in their own values, they would have tried other measures before jumping straight to the nuclear option, or simply bit the bullet and tried keeping us on staff until things really get dire, working towards a future where things never get that far.
I, more than anything, am disappointed to have my cynicism confirmed.
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Here and there
Posts: 1,906
For anyone who cares, by the numbers management threw out last month, Delta currently has enough cash on hand to operate for 17 months. Being generous, keeping those 1941 pilots on UNA status costs roughly $1M a day. The difference between furloughing and not is about 20 days.
This does not include any sort of revenue increase or voluntary cost saving measures that could otherwise be implemented.
Let's be clear, Delta does not have to furlough. If they truly believed in their own values, they would have tried other measures before jumping straight to the nuclear option, or simply biting the bullet and keeping us on staff until things really got dire.
I, more than anything, am disappointed to have my cynicism confirmed.
This does not include any sort of revenue increase or voluntary cost saving measures that could otherwise be implemented.
Let's be clear, Delta does not have to furlough. If they truly believed in their own values, they would have tried other measures before jumping straight to the nuclear option, or simply biting the bullet and keeping us on staff until things really got dire.
I, more than anything, am disappointed to have my cynicism confirmed.
This isn’t over and I implore anyone throwing in the towel to cease and desist.
#27
Rodeo clown
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Position: Tractor seat
Posts: 703
If by desired outcomes you mean that RG or JL can interview for corporate ladder climbing and crow about “brilliantly achieving savings (concessions from pilots) during the most dire of times,” then you’re correct. The “desired outcomes” will be promotions, and they’re clearly focused on the goal.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Here and there
Posts: 1,906
Haha that’s a classic. But how prophetic your quote is regarding the number 1941...
#29
For anyone who cares, by the numbers management threw out last month, Delta currently has enough cash on hand to operate for 17 months. Being generous, keeping those 1941 pilots on UNA status costs roughly $1M a day. The difference between furloughing and not is about 20 days.
This does not include any sort of revenue increase or voluntary cost saving measures that could otherwise be implemented.
Let's be clear, Delta does not have to furlough. If they truly believed in their own values, they would have tried other measures before jumping straight to the nuclear option, or simply bit the bullet and tried keeping us on staff until things really get dire, working towards a future where things never get that far.
I, more than anything, am disappointed to have my cynicism confirmed.
This does not include any sort of revenue increase or voluntary cost saving measures that could otherwise be implemented.
Let's be clear, Delta does not have to furlough. If they truly believed in their own values, they would have tried other measures before jumping straight to the nuclear option, or simply bit the bullet and tried keeping us on staff until things really get dire, working towards a future where things never get that far.
I, more than anything, am disappointed to have my cynicism confirmed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post