![]() |
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 3140001)
There are no metrics to equate less flying to less furlough. How has “at discretion” worked so far? Think ULC will be available on NB fleets in heavy months?
|
Originally Posted by Drum
(Post 3140019)
I think this is my largest hang up on this LOA. Given past practices from this management team.
|
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3140028)
that’s a fair point, but do you think the pull down language offsets this? If the company decides to furlough the 220 or this loa has a huge take rate and people are not brought back the union can waive the BS flag and threaten to pull down the LOA. I can agree I wish It did have metrics, just like I wish the VEOP had metrics. That still saved ~600 from unemployment
|
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 3140001)
There are no metrics to equate less flying to less furlough. How has “at discretion” worked so far? Think ULC will be available on NB fleets in heavy months?
|
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 3140035)
What is the pull down metric? What did the reps agree on with regard to the pull down language? Altering the PWA with no metrics and ambiguity? 600 now, you’re making that up.
|
Originally Posted by D B Cooper
(Post 3135040)
In 2000, I could take a girl out for dinner and a movie and gate laid for under $100. Good luck finding that deal in 2020.
|
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3140042)
huh? I’m legit confused by your post. The union can pull down LOA 20-03 with 30 days notice. That’s in the loa, the 600 was referring to the VEOP mentioned in the previous sentence. I believe the exact number was 617 but I’m not positive. What exactly in that post was I making up?
|
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3140028)
that’s a fair point, but do you think the pull down language offsets this? If the company decides to furlough the 220 or this loa has a huge take rate and people are not brought back the union can waive the BS flag and threaten to pull down the LOA. I can agree I wish It did have metrics, just like I wish the VEOP had metrics. That still saved ~600 from unemployment
Words have meaning with this management group. We saw that with SILs from the April debacle. Lets not fall for it again. Maybe the kompany could have saved 1500 pilots from furlough from the VEOP, but rather told us only 600? Pocket the cost savings on the rest - maybe that is why no metrics are given? Management has a cost item for everything. yeah, BFD, we get a pull down option. How about we just not exercise it and toss this LOA into the heap and start over. They are not even trying to work with us. Please don't furlough shame me either, it doesn't work. |
Originally Posted by Drum
(Post 3140055)
What we get is managements discretion, except for I believe the USERRA MLOA piece. They don't have to offer anything, and they have to accept/approve what is offered and bid on by the group. Even if offered, doesn't mean they will approve. This LOA leaves everything to the kompany. That is why I get hung up "at discretion of..."
Words have meaning with this management group. We saw that with SILs from the April debacle. Lets not fall for it again. Maybe the kompany could have saved 1500 pilots from furlough from the VEOP, but rather told us only 600? Pocket the cost savings on the rest - maybe that is why no metrics are given? Management has a cost item for everything. yeah, BFD, we get a pull down option. How about we just not exercise it and toss this LOA into the heap and start over. They are not even trying to work with us. Please don't furlough shame me either, it doesn't work. |
Originally Posted by D B Cooper
(Post 3140037)
I understand that. However, the VEOP had no metrics either. I haven't heard anyone protesting the company, saying more should have been saved based on the 1800 leaving. However, I know the 600 saved are very happy to be saved. I guess the big question to ask, if one doesn't find any benefit to themselves for any of the Vol. measures. Do you think keeping 220 of your colleagues employed through the holidays is a benefit?
Someday we'll know what the real plan was, but the company seems pretty fickle on what matters to them. I understand I'm being suspicious but i think its a reasonable assumption some of the 2558 were inflated estimates as are the 1721 remainders. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:49 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands