12% Raise
11-10-2020 | 10:53 AM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,599
Likes: 251
From: UNA
My point was not whether or not they withheld their vaccine (like you, I’d need to see evidence) but that either way (assuming for a second that they did) that it would have been released after the election instead of them continuing to hold onto it like another poster said. I thought my last sentence would have clarified that, I guess not
11-10-2020 | 10:57 AM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 20
From: 7ER B...whatever that means.
I think either way they would have announced it after the election. If their Goal was to influence the election and try to present the current administration as failing on the vaccine front, releasing the news after the election would have helped achieve this goal. If Biden won they got their desired result, if trump won it would not have mattered if they sat on that news for a couple weeks. All this assuming the information was purposely withheld
11-10-2020 | 11:00 AM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,599
Likes: 251
From: UNA
Fair enough. I think that is a rather large assumption without any evidence and even if it was proven, it doesn't move the needle much for me. Pfizer behaves much like any large corporation: follow the money and you will usually find your explanation. But I see your point.
11-10-2020 | 01:25 PM
#25
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
My point was not whether or not they withheld their vaccine (like you, I’d need to see evidence) but that either way (assuming for a second that they did) that it would have been released after the election instead of them continuing to hold onto it like another poster said. I thought my last sentence would have clarified that, I guess not
11-10-2020 | 02:43 PM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 78
I personally verified a dead person in Michigan got an absentee ballot. Anyone can verify on the Michigan state website. Where do you stand on the legitimacy of the American voting system?
11-10-2020 | 02:53 PM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,182
Likes: 662
Definitely needs reforming and brought into the 21st century (technology-wise and a strong look at getting rid of the electoral college), but let's be honest...dead people receiving ballots did NOT change the outcome of this election. Especially anymore than it changed the outcome of previous elections.
11-10-2020 | 03:14 PM
#28
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 61
Our system, while not perfect (is there such a thing?) is easily one of the best in the world. Meanwhile, we have a sitting president who has been actively trying to undermine it for months (sans evidence) and now dangerously playing with our Republic. That isn't a partisan statement, it's legitimately concerning no matter who has the office.
11-10-2020 | 03:15 PM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,593
Likes: 354
Definitely needs reforming and brought into the 21st century (technology-wise and a strong look at getting rid of the electoral college), but let's be honest...dead people receiving ballots did NOT change the outcome of this election. Especially anymore than it changed the outcome of previous elections.
11-10-2020 | 03:22 PM
#30
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 997
Likes: 97
Definitely needs reforming and brought into the 21st century (technology-wise and a strong look at getting rid of the electoral college), but let's be honest...dead people receiving ballots did NOT change the outcome of this election. Especially anymore than it changed the outcome of previous elections.
A5S
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
