30 Million Americans Vaccinated In 25 Days
#821
Originally Posted by theUpsideDown;[url=tel:3203143
3203143[/url]]Uno, dos, tres, cuatro, cinco, cinco, seís.
Lotta those lyrics explain one of the loudest posters on here coincidentally.
Lotta those lyrics explain one of the loudest posters on here coincidentally.
#822
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,909
Sounds smart to me. This FLOA would be pay-protected, right?
#823
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,909
Sounds smart to me. This FLOA would be pay-protected, right?
#825
Great write up in WaPo (a truly awful news rag, but even a blind squirrel...)
88 percent of the deaths in the first year of the pandemic took place in countries where more that half the population was classified as overweight or obese.
Put another way, if you're skinny, there was no pandemic for you, and never was. Chances of severe complications/hospitalization drop WAY down for slender people.
Skinny people sure had to pay for it though. IMF estimating Covid is going to cost 22 trillion over 2020-2025. (at least $10 trillion already).
In hindsight (always 20/20), rather than shutting down the world, masks, and social distancing, it would have been much better to enact an enforceable order for anyone with a BMI over 25 to quarantine at home.
That's right: Actual "fat police". But I guess "body shaming" is out, "fat is beautiful" is in...#science, I guess.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...global-report/ (behind the paywall)
https://www.worldobesityday.org/asse...2021-Atlas.pdf (the full study...and a good read that argues overwhelmingly that fat/obesity of a nation is a better predictor than age, wealth, reporting efficiency, etc.) ----THIS IS A REALLY GOOD READ
88 percent of the deaths in the first year of the pandemic took place in countries where more that half the population was classified as overweight or obese.
Put another way, if you're skinny, there was no pandemic for you, and never was. Chances of severe complications/hospitalization drop WAY down for slender people.
Skinny people sure had to pay for it though. IMF estimating Covid is going to cost 22 trillion over 2020-2025. (at least $10 trillion already).
In hindsight (always 20/20), rather than shutting down the world, masks, and social distancing, it would have been much better to enact an enforceable order for anyone with a BMI over 25 to quarantine at home.
That's right: Actual "fat police". But I guess "body shaming" is out, "fat is beautiful" is in...#science, I guess.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...global-report/ (behind the paywall)
https://www.worldobesityday.org/asse...2021-Atlas.pdf (the full study...and a good read that argues overwhelmingly that fat/obesity of a nation is a better predictor than age, wealth, reporting efficiency, etc.) ----THIS IS A REALLY GOOD READ
I would have preferred fat police over mask police. I guess I'll smile under the mask while protecting the freedom to wash down a double burger and fries with a 64 oz Coke.
#826
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,091
This is complete BS. The science clearly shows that fat is fit. These people obviously have some kind of agenda. Kinda sad that people will go out of their way to body shame when they should be worrying about the more than 500k people that have died during this pandemic.
Get it through your heads, FAT is FIT. FAT is HEALTHY. FAT is BEAUTIFUL. FAT is PHAT.
Ugh, I can’t believe I had to remind people of this, I’m almost too stressed/tired to go to my front door and pick up my UberEats delivery of a bacon cheeseburger, large fries, large milkshake, and large Diet Coke from Five Guys
Get it through your heads, FAT is FIT. FAT is HEALTHY. FAT is BEAUTIFUL. FAT is PHAT.
Ugh, I can’t believe I had to remind people of this, I’m almost too stressed/tired to go to my front door and pick up my UberEats delivery of a bacon cheeseburger, large fries, large milkshake, and large Diet Coke from Five Guys
#827
#828
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: Power top
Posts: 2,959
You can get the Covid anal swab test in China, let us know how it goes.
#829
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
So possibly "better" from an overall logistical perspective, but is it "better" for an individual recipient?
#830
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,191
I thought the J&J had about a 75% efficacy as opposed to 90+% for the others? But that still might be better for a total population. Don’t follow it that closely...the J&J number might be misinformation...please correct me if I’m wrong.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post