Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Council 44 Recall (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/133784-council-44-recall.html)

Herkflyr 05-07-2021 08:34 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 3231980)
Covered the matter in-depth with them. Our MEC is more unified on this issue than any issue. The Chairman's letter represented the position of every Rep I've spoken with or who has published their thoughts.



If you are posting falsehoods in support of recall maybe you can explain why B B (can't use names but rhymes with Cartel) wants Brent out. Thought that they were friendlies, allies. I can not keep track of f-NWA political intrigue. Kindly provide an update if you are so inclined.

I thought the BB we're talking about rhymes with Rotella. He's certainly the one pushing the recall on FB.

Bucking Bar 05-07-2021 11:12 AM


Originally Posted by boog123 (Post 3232014)
Don’t bother, Bar isn’t the kind of guy to go to the source and man up. He’s more an order taker. Remember the famous picture, he looks like someone brought their little brother and he actually thinks he’s in the frat. “What’s he doing here!” Lol

Not in the picture. Wasn't in the frat. My criticisms earned me a lifetime ban.

Bill always thinks I don't like him. That is not the case. It's not the caporegime, it's the associates, who get sloppy.

theUpsideDown 05-07-2021 11:30 AM


Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3231844)
if they won’t write down their position, how do you know they “support Patrick Burns memo?[sic]”


what does “supporting” the memo even mean?

*starts Slow clap* funny af

theUpsideDown 05-07-2021 11:35 AM


Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 3231800)
Every single items management wants they favor.

Even as we speak.

Call them. Ask them if they support Patrick Burns memo. More 76 seat RJs for Endeavor.

Don’t let them talk in circles. Make them write down their position in written form. They never ever will:

i remember when i adored your crazy
sometimes crazy is just crazy.

notEnuf 05-07-2021 02:25 PM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 3231994)
Very true. But there was more to the VEOP, 20-04, stuff like PS commuting and the Market Based Cash Balance Plan. The Reps crafted a plan that protected jobs, which thankfully was not necessitated because of the PPP. Their willingness to risk unpopularity to protect pilots was, and is, the core of their job as Status Representatives.

As a results guy you should be disappointed with the progress on the MBCBP. Three years of “study” and a year since implementation was accepted, yet 2020 came and went without an additional savings tool. I’m not holding my breath on 2021. LOAs were fine for the previous Covid19 circumstances but no more. Solve all the issues in one agreement.

JamesBond 05-07-2021 02:44 PM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 3232239)
As a results guy you should be disappointed with the progress on the MBCBP. Three years of “study” and a year since implementation was accepted, yet 2020 came and went without an additional savings tool. I’m not holding my breath on 2021. LOAs were fine for the previous Covid19 circumstances but no more. Solve all the issues in one agreement.

The people it could have helped have mostly left or are soon to. I don't GAF if it ever passes at this point. Just pay me more money and I'll figure it out myself.

notEnuf 05-07-2021 07:15 PM


Originally Posted by JamesBond (Post 3232245)
The people it could have helped have mostly left or are soon to. I don't GAF if it ever passes at this point. Just pay me more money and I'll figure it out myself.

We got it in the LOA. I'll gladly take another tax shelter.

JamesBond 05-08-2021 12:55 PM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 3232323)
We got it in the LOA. I'll gladly take another tax shelter.

It doesn't personally do me any good if it takes another 2 years to set up. Tempus fugit. I'll take what I can get, but.... meh.

gzsg 05-08-2021 04:29 PM


Originally Posted by Starcheck102 (Post 3232042)
I oppose the company memorandum, and wholeheartedly support the Master Chairman’s decision to respond with a grievance. We must resist all forms of outsourcing, the primary task of a union is to preserve the jobs of its members.

Kevin O’Mahoney

Kevin

Thank you for using your real name.

Would you ever support allowing more RJs at our DCI partners?

It’s easy to say what you posted. Let’s talk about what really matters. I see C44 leading the charge for some deal to allow our DCI carriers more RJs.

Obviously management wants them very badly.

bugman61 05-09-2021 03:44 AM


Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 3232616)
Kevin

Thank you for using your real name.

Would you ever support allowing more RJs at our DCI partners?

It’s easy to say what you posted. Let’s talk about what really matters. I see C44 leading the charge for some deal to allow our DCI carriers more RJs.

Obviously management wants them very badly.


How do you “see this?” You obviously aren’t talking to the 44 reps about what they think. I spoke with one of them last week and they couldn’t believe how stupid and tone deaf the memo was. And their idea for increasing smaller lift was “last I heard we have a bunch of 71s sitting in the dessert, just bring those back”

I get it, you want them gone for any reason you can find. But claiming that they are hungry to cave on scope when it’s easily verifiable that they feel the opposite hurts your cause.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:42 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands