![]() |
Originally Posted by 3 green
(Post 3385145)
I agree with you, but almost the entire pilot group is scared to call in fatigued as we speak. Pilots want to blend in and not cast a spotlight on themselves for obvious reasons. If a few pilots did it weekly, I guarantee you they would be targeted. Maybe nothing would come from it, but they would be targeted by mgmt.
|
Originally Posted by 3 green
(Post 3385145)
I agree with you, but almost the entire pilot group is scared to call in fatigued as we speak. Pilots want to blend in and not cast a spotlight on themselves for obvious reasons. If a few pilots did it weekly, I guarantee you they would be targeted. Maybe nothing would come from it, but they would be targeted by mgmt.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3385157)
No one I've talked to has ever said they are afraid to call in fatigued. No one I've talked to who has called in fatigued has ever received serious pushback. Stop making this into a boogieman...
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3385157)
No one I've talked to has ever said they are afraid to call in fatigued. No one I've talked to who has called in fatigued has ever received serious pushback. Stop making this into a boogieman...
|
Originally Posted by 3 green
(Post 3385174)
That would mean the rotations really are not fatiguing then because VERY few pilots are calling in fatigued. So why is everyone complaining about how bad the rotations are? If they are not afraid to call in fatigued why are more pilots not doing it?
|
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3385180)
for me, undesirable rotations and actual “I can’t safely complete this flight” fatigue are not always the same.
Many MANY of the trips are built lately to a level that will possibly/likely result in a fatigue call. Some days you actually feel pretty good and can safely complete the schedule. Other days not so much. It’s the same as a sick call. If you’re sick you’re sick. If you’re fatigued you’re fatigued. A crusade against **** trip construction is different. Not saying the trips don’t suck but we lose the deserved high ground if we conflate the two issues, however tightly related they may be. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3385155)
The conundrum being if you don’t call in fatigued when you are fatigued now when you finally do get so fatigued you can’t avoid calling in it can be interpreted by some judge as a change in status meant to illegally affect negotiations.
Damned if you do and damned if you don’t. Damn! |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3385180)
for me, undesirable rotations and actual “I can’t safely complete this flight” fatigue are not always the same.
I also flew a poor trip a couple of months ago. It was an ATL-DEN-ATL turn. Worth about 6 hours. Normally those go senior. There was a reason I got it. There was a 3.5 sit in DEN, different airplane going back of course, no lounge, no place to relax away from the crowds. We just had to grumble and find a restaurant then some quiet corner. It sucked but I couldn't I good faith claim I was fatigued. But I sure check the sit times more carefully now! |
Originally Posted by Vsop
(Post 3385230)
I follow this logic and I know there was a lawsuit with another carrier (AA) I think. My question is when does the change in schedule quality and flexibility become and change in status quo? The numbers post in the OP are from 2018 or basically since the amendable date. Could ALPA try and enforce status quo for a change?
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3385104)
This is another important reminder to not fly fatigued. If you are fatigued due to fatiguing rotations, call in fatigued. Reference last summer's series on how to do it.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:02 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands