![]() |
Originally Posted by Der Meister
(Post 3390541)
I personally always see the FU jet even when I fly it. I was/will always be an UNA i very much remember how they treated us. They can go pound as much sand as Ed has lost sleep over.
No amount of TYFAD will solve that problem they created. I will always remember I'm just a number and thus they are always just a number to me. I will always be doing minimal effort until I retire in 30 years. IDGAS about the delta difference these days. The only difference I care about is how much $ I'm loosing by being here compared to my peers. FUPM! You could always go join your peers, where you will stop loosing(sp?) money. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by LeineLodge
(Post 3390579)
How you were treated as a UNA? It was stressful but you were paid the entire time (acknowledging that was largely due to CARES).
Had to do an extra lap or two on VA Ave? Me too (not UNA.) Ask the 9/11 furloughees if they’d trade stories with you. Now you’re saying you’re going to pitch a multi-decade fit? Grow up. You can be an adult professional while still advocating for better working conditions. The two aren’t mutually exclusive. Maybe you’re venting? I will be very professional as I have always been but strictly by the contract and nothing more. Nothing extra nada thing.
Originally Posted by bode
(Post 3390582)
You could always go join your peers, where you will stop loosing(sp?) money.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
Originally Posted by Der Meister
(Post 3390585)
Multiple furlough letters not being able to plan your life. Yeah you wouldn't understand. Each genration has its own lost genration where the previous group doesn't think the new group has gone though enough to deserve recognition. It's sad that that's how it's still done to this day.
I will be very professional as I have always been but strictly by the contract and nothing more. Nothing extra nada thing. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3389588)
Not that long ago a big complaint was that we needed trips like SW because guys wanted to work fewer days. Our trip value per day is much better now than pre 2016 but now the trips are to hard.
|
Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
(Post 3390587)
Surprised it took you until 2020 to realize employees are just numbers to corporations. Better late than never though!
|
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 3390588)
“Our” trips don’t mirror SW trips. I noticed how you made sure you avoided the comparison. Just that our trip pay is “better”.
|
Originally Posted by Der Meister
(Post 3390585)
Multiple furlough letters not being able to plan your life. Yeah you wouldn't understand. Each genration has its own lost genration where the previous group doesn't think the new group has gone though enough to deserve recognition. It's sad that that's how it's still done to this day.
I will be very professional as I have always been but strictly by the contract and nothing more. Nothing extra nada thing. I’m sorry you all had to go through the uncertainty but in the grand scheme of life’s “injustices” that was a big nothing burger. I’m extremely happy everyone is back and rocketing upwards in opportunity. Just a little friendly advice that you can obviously ignore. Don’t martyr yourself. 30 years is too long to be angry about the UNA blip. |
Originally Posted by LeineLodge
(Post 3390595)
No problem with fly the contract. Especially in section 6.
I’m sorry you all had to go through the uncertainty but in the grand scheme of life’s “injustices” that was a big nothing burger. I’m extremely happy everyone is back and rocketing upwards in opportunity. Just a little friendly advice that you can obviously ignore. Don’t martyr yourself. 30 years is too long to be angry about the UNA blip. Doing more than minimal has gotten us horrid rotations, short overnights, and TYFAD with no real improvements in 2.5 years...continuing to do the same thing and expecting different results is just the definition to insanity. Break the trend! |
Originally Posted by LeineLodge
(Post 3390579)
How you were treated as a UNA? It was stressful but you were paid the entire time (acknowledging that was largely due to CARES).
Had to do an extra lap or two on VA Ave? Me too (not UNA.) Ask the 9/11 furloughees if they’d trade stories with you. Now you’re saying you’re going to pitch a multi-decade fit? Grow up. You can be an adult professional while still advocating for better working conditions. The two aren’t mutually exclusive. Maybe you’re venting? |
All I will forward with is how UAL creates the sense of union from day one with half wings, eight ball ect...
Here at DAL it's dog eat dog. Our group has no sense of union and instead creates an entitlement of mine (see DZ, see non DZ, see lost era, see una, see ect...) it was fantastic to see all the GS go out while there were people out on UNA. You got yours so who cares about the una people. After all they deserved it for being JR at major airline....how foolish of them to think they made it and would be covered by DALPA... I'm sure Delta management is quite pleased with the infighting as they don't actually have to do anything. As it generally better than it was and worse than it is. So with our method no one wins and everyone loses. |
Originally Posted by Der Meister
(Post 3390616)
All I will forward with is how UAL creates the sense of union from day one with half wings, eight ball ect...
Here at DAL it's dog eat dog. Our group has no sense of union and instead creates an entitlement of mine (see DZ, see non DZ, see lost era, see una, see ect...) it was fantastic to see all the GS go out while there were people out on UNA. You got yours so who cares about the una people. After all they deserved it for being JR at major airline....how foolish of them to think they made it and would be covered by DALPA... I'm sure Delta management is quite pleased with the infighting as they don't actually have to do anything. As it generally better than it was and worse than it is. So with our method no one wins and everyone loses. I also appreciated that current pilots stepped up and volunteered their wings to new hires given the supply chain issues with brass right now. I was very grateful to have had a wing ceremony and they kept mentioning they are planning something special for the new hires that weren't able to get one due to world events. As a side note--UAL's 8 ball ceremony is a union event and not without it's controversies in the past. That's all I'll say about that. |
Originally Posted by myrkridia
(Post 3390721)
From the perspective of a new hire this has not been my experience so far. I happen to have been exposed to United's new hire process (short of going through it myself) and found them to be very similar. One thing that stood out to me about indoc with Delta is how appreciative they were that we decided to choose them. This was not the language I was expecting from management, given Delta's reputation for wanting to "be the best." Some of the leadership even went as far to acknowledge that they know some of us may even leave to other carriers due to geographic (base) reasons but they also hope we decide to stay for the rest of our careers. Actually what is funny is that the one presenter that kept repeating that Delta is the best (perhaps besides the B-day ladies) and the gold standard and all that was the guy supposedly representing the FAA!
I also appreciated that current pilots stepped up and volunteered their wings to new hires given the supply chain issues with brass right now. I was very grateful to have had a wing ceremony and they kept mentioning they are planning something special for the new hires that weren't able to get one due to world events. As a side note--UAL's 8 ball ceremony is a union event and not without it's controversies in the past. That's all I'll say about that. |
Originally Posted by smellson
(Post 3390733)
Glad to hear new hires experiences are getting better. 5yrs ago it was more of the "y'all are lucky to be here". Maybe all those annual surveys are working. United alpa 100% had more of a feeling of union and looking out for each other (Yes, I worked under both) Just look at what United agreed to vs Delta during covid talks. There wasn't a single Delta captain I flew with willing to take an hr of reduced work to save anyone else from a furlough, unlike what United agreed to do. Sure they'll all claim they were protecting the pwa but it was just greed and selfishness.
|
Originally Posted by smellson
(Post 3390733)
Glad to hear new hires experiences are getting better. 5yrs ago it was more of the "y'all are lucky to be here". Maybe all those annual surveys are working. United alpa 100% had more of a feeling of union and looking out for each other (Yes, I worked under both) Just look at what United agreed to vs Delta during covid talks. There wasn't a single Delta captain I flew with willing to take an hr of reduced work to save anyone else from a furlough, unlike what United agreed to do. Sure they'll all claim they were protecting the pwa but it was just greed and selfishness.
|
Originally Posted by LeineLodge
(Post 3390579)
How you were treated as a UNA? It was stressful but you were paid the entire time (acknowledging that was largely due to CARES).
Had to do an extra lap or two on VA Ave? Me too (not UNA.) Ask the 9/11 furloughees if they’d trade stories with you. Now you’re saying you’re going to pitch a multi-decade fit? Grow up. You can be an adult professional while still advocating for better working conditions. The two aren’t mutually exclusive. Maybe you’re venting?
Originally Posted by LeineLodge
(Post 3390595)
I’m sorry you all had to go through the uncertainty but in the grand scheme of life’s “injustices” that was a big nothing burger. I’m extremely happy everyone is back and rocketing upwards in opportunity.
Now you’re saying you’re going to pitch a multi-decade fit? Grow up. |
Originally Posted by smellson
(Post 3390733)
Glad to hear new hires experiences are getting better. 5yrs ago it was more of the "y'all are lucky to be here". Maybe all those annual surveys are working. United alpa 100% had more of a feeling of union and looking out for each other (Yes, I worked under both) Just look at what United agreed to vs Delta during covid talks. There wasn't a single Delta captain I flew with willing to take an hr of reduced work to save anyone else from a furlough, unlike what United agreed to do. Sure they'll all claim they were protecting the pwa but it was just greed and selfishness.
|
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3390872)
Dude, this is such a ****ty attitude. And you guys wonder why “no one cares about the DZ’s”. You just can’t help yourself from shouting about how you had it worse. FFS. Education is one thing, but rubbing younger guys noses in it is entirely different.
Easy to say - after the fact - when you weren’t staring down the barrel of the gun. This is so ironic, it’s pathetic. Talk about tone deaf. My grow up comment was in response to DM threatening 30 years of min effort. Maybe I mis-read his "fly the contract" stance, but it sounds like a lot of baggage to carry around for a long time. Could management have handled it better? Absolutely, particularly with SILs or something similar a-la United. It was also an epic hundreds-of-parked-jets-tumbleweeds-in-the-streets period of time - easy to forget that after the fact.
Originally Posted by Iceberg
(Post 3390873)
I’m sorry for your experience, but mine was different. The vast majority I flew with voiced support for the UNAs. There were outliers, but I felt supported. Granted they could have voted differently, but I didn’t hear that.
|
Originally Posted by LeineLodge
(Post 3390884)
I wasn't furloughed, nor a deadzoner. By all relative measures I've had a charmed career, for which I'm extremely grateful. However I'd say the same thing to guys hanging on to the pensions, SLI injustices, furloughs, whatever: let it go.
My grow up comment was in response to DM threatening 30 years of min effort. Maybe I mis-read his "fly the contract" stance, but it sounds like a lot of baggage to carry around for a long time. Could management have handled it better? Absolutely, particularly with SILs or something similar a-la United. It was also an epic hundreds-of-parked-jets-tumbleweeds-in-the-streets period of time - easy to forget that after the fact. This. Don't confuse my lack of a pity party for lack of compassion and support. I was all on board to take lower pay, cover health insurance, etc. Most "senior" pilots I spoke with at the time felt exactly the same way. Glad you guys are all back. I just flew with a UNA on my last trip and the dude was awesome. Much better to focus on what we have in common than what divides us. I called my alpa rep after seeing several communications adamant about not reducing work to save UNA's and was told I was the ONLY person who had expressed a willingness to work less to save the UNAs. He basically tried to tell me how it was a bad idea and that it wouldn't work.....I was blown away. Thankfully the cares money kept everyone on board.... |
Originally Posted by 3 green
(Post 3389548)
From what I've heard, fatigue calls are not even up much, if any.
Numerous convos with pilots + my own experience shows that calling in fatigued is still frowned upon, and while maybe not be punitive, "on the radar" is a very real thing |
Originally Posted by Crown
(Post 3391232)
why would they go up when the Duty Pilot doesn't have your back?
Numerous convos with pilots + my own experience shows that calling in fatigued is still frowned upon, and while maybe not be punitive, "on the radar" is a very real thing |
Originally Posted by smellson
(Post 3391240)
Everytime I've called in fatigued the duty pilot has 110% had my back. Never caught any flack from anyone afterwards either. As someone who was at one point a little paranoid at work, I simply don't feel any "threat" from my cpo. Nobody should be afraid to call in fatigued/sick...
|
Originally Posted by Crown
(Post 3391232)
why would they go up when the Duty Pilot doesn't have your back?
Numerous convos with pilots + my own experience shows that calling in fatigued is still frowned upon, and while maybe not be punitive, "on the radar" is a very real thing |
Originally Posted by Crown
(Post 3391244)
I'm envious. That was not my experience last summer. Both times, the Duty Pilot just told me that I was legal for it. No support. None.
If you are fatigued, please call it. |
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3391274)
I think I would chalk that up to a bad experience/Duty Pilot, Crown. The recent DALPA MEC podcast has gone out our their way to say the experience is zero threat, and there is zero tracking (there isn't really a mechanism, according to APLA).
If you are fatigued, please call it. |
Originally Posted by Crown
(Post 3391244)
I'm envious. That was not my experience last summer. Both times, the Duty Pilot just told me that I was legal for it. No support. None.
|
I’ve called in several times (2 over the last 3 months most recently), never had pushback.
Quite frankly the last time I called in I didn’t need an extension, it was just a long day with crappy sleep and the hour delay in the second flight was just too much for me. What can I say, I’m a wuss. Don’t call the DP looking for justification, you have nothing to prove to them and they are not the judge. Their only job is to acknowledge and process your UNfit/Fatigue status. If a DP gives you pushback I’d say “I understand you don’t agree, I am still calling in fatigued.” I would certainly note the DP pushback in the report to ensure the FAA gets eyes on it. |
Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
(Post 3390748)
I know there will be exceptions, but the group voted overwhelmingly for the LOA.
|
Originally Posted by Jp8burner;[url=tel:3391288
3391288]I’ve called in several times (2 over the last 3 months most recently), never had pushback.
Quite frankly the last time I called in I didn’t need an extension, it was just a long day with crappy sleep and the hour delay in the second flight was just too much for me. What can I say, I’m a wuss. Don’t call the DP looking for justification, you have nothing to prove to them and they are not the judge. Their only job is to acknowledge and process your UNfit/Fatigue status. If a DP gives you pushback I’d say “I understand you don’t agree, I am still calling in fatigued.” I would certainly note the DP pushback in the report to ensure the FAA gets eyes on it. That said, I’ve had nothing but excellent support from the Duty Pilots when I’ve had to call fatigued or not extending. |
Originally Posted by Hrkdrivr
(Post 3391349)
This. They are facilitating downstream changes that will happen so you can get the rest you need. Don’t ask them anything, tell them. Tell them you’re done and when you’ll be rested again to be safe to fly.
That said, I’ve had nothing but excellent support from the Duty Pilots when I’ve had to call fatigued or not extending. |
Originally Posted by Crown
(Post 3391244)
I'm envious. That was not my experience last summer. Both times, the Duty Pilot just told me that I was legal for it. No support. None.
|
Originally Posted by Crown
(Post 3391244)
I'm envious. That was not my experience last summer. Both times, the Duty Pilot just told me that I was legal for it. No support. None.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3391282)
You said, "I'm fatigued." And his response was, "it's legal?" I've called in a few times during a legal rotation and I've never gotten any flack or pushback.
|
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 3391467)
Just ask "is it legal to fly fatigued"?
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3391439)
What support were you looking for? Was his statement you were legal for the reroute correct or incorrect? That fact your legal for the reroute has no bearing on if it’s safe and you should or should not accept it. When you refused it did he threaten you? Did you have a negative follow up with anyone from flight ops?
Btw Sailing, your comment about "was his statement you were legal for the reroute correct" says to me you'd push back on anyone who calls in fatigued. Nice job. |
Originally Posted by Crown
(Post 3391537)
I called, to explain the situation, and that I was debating calling in fatigued.
|
Originally Posted by Crown
(Post 3391537)
I called, to explain the situation, and that I was debating calling in fatigued. After he went over the extension legality and telling me I was good for several more hours, he said I could call in fatigued, but reminded me about 4 times that I was legal. When a duty pilot tells you a bunch of times you're legal, he's telling you to not call off, and that if you do, it's going to come back to you. You can disagree with me on this, but I'm calling it like it happened to me. So yes, forgive me if I'm afraid to call in fatigued, out of fear of pushback from management.
Btw Sailing, your comment about "was his statement you were legal for the reroute correct" says to me you'd push back on anyone who calls in fatigued. Nice job. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3391485)
You should also add, “This call is taped correct”. Now if you reported that day at 9 am and it’s noon and the reroute gets you done at 3 you might expect some follow up.
|
Originally Posted by Crown
(Post 3391537)
I called, to explain the situation, and that I was debating calling in fatigued.
Make a command decision. You’re a Captain, right? Or going to be? |
Originally Posted by Guppydriver95
(Post 3391368)
In my humble opinion, this is the biggest difference between my employer (U) and Delta, wrt fatigue calls. There shouldn’t have to be a “conversation” with anybody in order not to extend. Acars message comes across and says pretty please, you type back “unable to extend” and it’s done. All the pairing modifications happen automatically without speaking to a soul. If Delta keeps the current process in place, there will always be a certain percentage of pilots who feel like they’re being sent to the principal’s office and will extend just to avoid it. Yes it’s wrong headed and weak, but we all know it’s true. Remove the required conversation with a human from the “unable to extend” process.
If you’re not going to extend, you need to call and let them know the flight isn’t going, at least not going with you in the seat. I don’t disagree with the bolded part. |
Question to the DL group from a FDX guy.
We at purple are fighting the same fight with revisions and extensions. You would think wanting it fixed and a contract sooner than later would encourage people to fly there line. By adding extra flying via draft/GS you are condoning the extra abuse. Are you seeing a lot of your pilot group still flying a lot of “extra” flying voluntarily? Most in our group is happily still going above and beyond with a big Thank You from management. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:38 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands