Pilot morale
#313
Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk
#314
Pre Covid is was JFK / LGA / EWR.
You can always fly into LGA and Kew Cab it to JFK…$20
#315
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
JFK and LGA are reasonable "co-terminals" IMO. A motivated cab driver can get you between both (even in rush hour unless its really bad) in comparable times as getting between worst case gate transfers at a single airport.
EWR has nothing to do with either. That should be a layover city or a separate base.
EWR has nothing to do with either. That should be a layover city or a separate base.
#316
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,139
Likes: 560
JFK and LGA are reasonable "co-terminals" IMO. A motivated cab driver can get you between both (even in rush hour unless its really bad) in comparable times as getting between worst case gate transfers at a single airport.
EWR has nothing to do with either. That should be a layover city or a separate base.
EWR has nothing to do with either. That should be a layover city or a separate base.
#317
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,565
Likes: 228
From: UNA
JFK and LGA are reasonable "co-terminals" IMO. A motivated cab driver can get you between both (even in rush hour unless its really bad) in comparable times as getting between worst case gate transfers at a single airport.
EWR has nothing to do with either. That should be a layover city or a separate base.
EWR has nothing to do with either. That should be a layover city or a separate base.
Lax should just be LAX, with no other co bases
#319
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Yeah the LA "co-terminals" are a relic carrot from the days of a little micro base for the few who actually lived there. Now its a much larger base and will be full of commuters and new hires assigned it til they can bid out.
In the past all those "co-terminals" were a company condition to even have a base there. Now they want a base there big time. Time to pull down most if not all of the "co-terminals". If hotel savings are such a cash machine they can open them as domiciles.
In the past all those "co-terminals" were a company condition to even have a base there. Now they want a base there big time. Time to pull down most if not all of the "co-terminals". If hotel savings are such a cash machine they can open them as domiciles.
#320
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 27
Yeah the LA "co-terminals" are a relic carrot from the days of a little micro base for the few who actually lived there. Now its a much larger base and will be full of commuters and new hires assigned it til they can bid out.
In the past all those "co-terminals" were a company condition to even have a base there. Now they want a base there big time. Time to pull down most if not all of the "co-terminals". If hotel savings are such a cash machine they can open them as domiciles.
In the past all those "co-terminals" were a company condition to even have a base there. Now they want a base there big time. Time to pull down most if not all of the "co-terminals". If hotel savings are such a cash machine they can open them as domiciles.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




