Search

Notices

Contract Expectations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2022 | 05:58 AM
  #31  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
I'm not really sure where people are getting 30% from. From 2019 till today inflation has been ~15%. We're not getting 30%. 20% DOS, with full retro and a strong TA in other sections would get the job done. Plus a 4% per year minimum after that.

That's probably the biggest issue with the UA TA and the AA management offer - they're both being offered a small bump off today's current rates and ending up 18-20% higher in 2-3 years. Voting that in is completely locking in a loss of income due to inflation over the past 3 years. All the airlines have basically lost a contract cycle and we need a DOS pay increase that basically keeps us up with 2 contracts, one in 2019 and one in 2022.
does full retro mean 20% of all money earned since 2020, or some staggered amount reflecting a more normal raise schedule?
Reply
Old 07-03-2022 | 06:09 AM
  #32  
Roll’n Thunder
Community Influencer
15 Years
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,179
Likes: 594
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
does full retro mean 20% of all money earned since 2020, or some staggered amount reflecting a more normal raise schedule?
I would say a staggered amount. So say 4% 2020, 6% 2021, 8% 2022, or something like that.
Reply
Old 07-03-2022 | 06:25 AM
  #33  
New Hire
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 801
Likes: 7
From: Concourse A
Default

My minimum is 35% over 3 years.

DC 25%

2 years retro from Jan 2021.. I’ll even give them a pass for 2020 due to COVID

vacation and training pay 5:15

adjustments to delta medical plans to bring down costs

PS commuting

reroute needs to pay double

scope needs to be a solid win for group with upside and downside protections

crew meals aka UAL and increase in per diem to $4 hour .. intl override needs bumped as well


the time is now, and yes the company can afford it.
Reply
Old 07-03-2022 | 06:41 AM
  #34  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

The phrase, don’t negotiate in public comes to mind. Answer your surveys, speak to your elected reps with expectations, take the stupid hat off, and wear your dumb lanyard.
Reply
Old 07-03-2022 | 06:47 AM
  #35  
Der Meister's Avatar
Line Holder
15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 940
Likes: 30
From: 320A
Default

Originally Posted by Scooter432
My minimum is 35% over 3 years.

DC 25%

2 years retro from Jan 2021.. I’ll even give them a pass for 2020 due to COVID

vacation and training pay 5:15

adjustments to delta medical plans to bring down costs

PS commuting

reroute needs to pay double

scope needs to be a solid win for group with upside and downside protections

crew meals aka UAL and increase in per diem to $4 hour .. intl override needs bumped as well


the time is now, and yes the company can afford it.
I'd vote yes to this any day
Reply
Old 07-03-2022 | 07:04 AM
  #36  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by Der Meister
I'd vote yes to this any day
yes because it’s laughably high, like anyone who thinks they’ll get that
Reply
Old 07-03-2022 | 07:20 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Mooner
Until recent developments at UAL and AA, I really haven’t given any thought to what my expectations might be for our future TA. The reason being I knew we didn’t have the leadership in place to facilitate a timely resolution to section 6 negotiations. Right or wrong for making that assumption nearly 3 years ago, I have been proven right in the sense that we are now approaching the the 3 year mark since our amendable date.

I thought back then that it would take 3 or 4 years of time value to walk back whatever table position we opened with to something within striking range of a position that represented sound fiscal governance from a corporate perspective. Clearly we are now in that window and developments at other airlines are indicating the same willingness of airline management to engage.
I can't believe no one called out the OP for putting blame solely on ALPA for not being reasonable and thus the reason for the delay.
Reply
Old 07-03-2022 | 07:34 AM
  #38  
New Hire
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 801
Likes: 7
From: Concourse A
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
yes because it’s laughably high, like anyone who thinks they’ll get that
love your optimism.. keeping your hat on too correct?
Reply
Old 07-03-2022 | 07:39 AM
  #39  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by Scooter432
love your optimism.. keeping your hat on too correct?

realism > pie in the sky
Reply
Old 07-03-2022 | 08:00 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,920
Likes: 116
Default

Originally Posted by DALFA
When you’re unable to talk about facts you just attack the individual. Like a damsel in distress.
I wasnt discussing facts on here, keep the usernames straight.

The guy had a nice thread, y'all spoiled it, either work to get it back on track or be a pest on ur usual threads.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
Rogue24
Major
104
06-15-2012 04:49 AM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM
old gasser
Union Talk
28
06-08-2008 12:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices