![]() |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 3533022)
I don't know why this is a concern. The PM was changed under the Bartels Admin weakening the MEC Chair. The MEC, not the MEC Chair, sends direction to the NC. MEC Chair these days is simply administrative
Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 3533043)
Another tempest in a teapot. Have you guys all forgotten about Memory Rat? Nothing is over until we say its over! What happened when Mike Donatelli went all in for TA-1? The wisdom of the masses prevailed and that turd was flushed. In the connected high information world of the interwebs the MEC Chair is more like an Admin Officer than a CO. The days of uninformed Pilots blindly following Union recommendations are history. Yes he is in a "Leadership" position but his real power is minimal. Look what happened to the UAL MEC guy after their MEC passed and started to push the Turd Tumi TA, a one way ticket to Palookaville - his dreams of National Office shattered. Sell out your constituents and that is what happens.
In the immortal words of Kevin Bacon (one of Earths mightiest Heroes) - All is Well. Bonus - Whats the other Animal House quote weaved into this post? :D Scoop - Just my 2 cents What do I win? |
A TA-1 supporter that was also against the Strike Vote? If this is true, how does this receive even 1 vote, much less 9 votes?
A5S |
Boggles my mind.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk |
Is the rank and file going to cut this off at the head? I think the recall motions should start ASAP…
Idk if ATL is a company fortress, but there are clear issues in NYC. DTW and SLC can do better too. |
Originally Posted by 20Fathoms
(Post 3532945)
He was a TA1 supporter? I don’t know the guy, but considering that would make him more pro-company even than sailing, I’m not getting the warm fuzzies.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3533210)
Strange I did not support TA1 and voted against it.
|
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 3532959)
9 votes for Hartmann
DTW - Bell & Hartmann (Hartmann proxy to Bell) ATL - Marcos, Archer, Templin, Dann-Messier NYC - Cervantes SLC - Harper & Bradley |
Originally Posted by fishforfun
(Post 3533232)
The NY FO rep didn’t support his outgoing Capt rep? WTF?
|
Originally Posted by vyperdriver
(Post 3533235)
I wouldn't have supported him either for what its worth, but I sure as hell would over the clown act we just got put in. For those that are touting its just a figurehead, that guy represents all of us. He is the face that speaks on our behalf. The company no longer (imo) sees us as both an asset and a cost. We are now simply a cost to be controlled on the balance sheet. This Hartman guy had better understand that. The Professional pleasantries of the past and a strong desire to "work together" for the good of the company are long gone. You have to have a level of respect, and that just flat out doesn't exist on the companies side. Hartman needs to grab a pair and recognize that we are now in a business is business relationship. We don't need to get along with management, we just have to work with them.
But really I just want someone that will continue what you pointed out. After TA1 and more so during Covid, there has been a distinct change with how we are viewed/treated. We just need someone that will hold the line. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:06 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands