Search

Notices

Options Out of Base

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2023 | 11:08 AM
  #21  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Which is not difficult if you're above 80% seniority, which isn't difficult to obtain in NYC. The Optimize your Schedule document basically gives everyone the blueprint on how to clear your schedule



This is where "different strokes for different folks", "one man's trash is another's man's treasure" comes into play. Even if I couldn't drop all my trips I'd gladly commute for 24 hrs in AUA vs drive to work for 12 hrs in GPT/JAN etc plus the 4 leg day galore that's ATL flying.

With that said I'll GLADLY fly one leg to GPT layover and fly/DH back
How often do you resort to calling in sick to clear your schedule?

The OOBWS step breaks ARCOS, when an already large category expands to the entire system.

I have been told ALPA is negotiating concessions to try and fix the IA problem. Complete elimination of batch size is what I am hearing out of seniority opportunism will cost our pilot group.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 05-10-2023 at 11:20 AM.
Reply
Old 05-10-2023 | 11:19 AM
  #22  
iaflyer's Avatar
seeing the country...
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,004
Likes: 35
From: 73N A
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
How often do you resort to calling in sick to clear your schedule.
Who says he's calling in sick? He might be bidding some sweet trips with nice layovers, put them on the swap board and "poof" they are gone. I'm always surprised with the action I'm able to drop and pick up from the P2P swap board. Don't hate a guy for working the contract smarter, not harder.
Reply
Old 05-10-2023 | 11:33 AM
  #23  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer
Who says he's calling in sick? He might be bidding some sweet trips with nice layovers, put them on the swap board and "poof" they are gone. I'm always surprised with the action I'm able to drop and pick up from the P2P swap board. Don't hate a guy for working the contract smarter, not harder.
I did not say that HE is calling in sick and using fly back. However, anyone who does a random check of the OOBWS ninjas can observe the pattern.

Is costing other Pilots tens of thousands annually by bidding flying with no intention of flying those trips smart, or duplicitous?

Everyone waiting in line thinks **cutting in line is bull****.**
Reply
Old 05-10-2023 | 11:54 AM
  #24  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,145
Likes: 204
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
How often do you resort to calling in sick to clear your schedule?

The OOBWS step breaks ARCOS, when an already large category expands to the entire system.

I have been told ALPA is negotiating concessions to try and fix the IA problem. Complete elimination of batch size is what I am hearing out of seniority opportunism will cost our pilot group.
Zero. I clear my schedule every month using a variety of techniques that are shown in the Optimize your Schedule document from the Union.

OOBWS does not break ARCOS. It's simply the coverage step prior to in base GS. Also to address the OOBWS angst, it shouldn't be much of an issue to a strategic Greenslipper. Majority of OOBWS folks snap up silly easy broken up trips that most pilots WS, saving GS for longer, higher paying 3 and 4 day trips.
Reply
Old 05-10-2023 | 11:57 AM
  #25  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,145
Likes: 204
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
I did not say that HE is calling in sick and using fly back. However, anyone who does a random check of the OOBWS ninjas can observe the pattern.

Is costing other Pilots tens of thousands annually by bidding flying with no intention of flying those trips smart, or duplicitous?

Everyone waiting in line thinks **cutting in line is bull****.**
There is no cutting in line. Those OOBWS trips are available to inbase pilots as a WS first. Then out of base. If it's still not covered then it goes GS.
Reply
Old 05-10-2023 | 12:59 PM
  #26  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Zero. I clear my schedule every month using a variety of techniques that are shown in the Optimize your Schedule document from the Union.

OOBWS does not break ARCOS. It's simply the coverage step prior to in base GS. Also to address the OOBWS angst, it shouldn't be much of an issue to a strategic Greenslipper. Majority of OOBWS folks snap up silly easy broken up trips that most pilots WS, saving GS for longer, higher paying 3 and 4 day trips.
Good. Surely you are aware that others do not follow your approach.

Let’s talk about the problem. We have 643 320B’s in ATL. If half that number had slips in each step of coverage would run 4 hours during the day and 21 hours at night. Guessing that many slips are not in, but CS tells me it is running four hours to get through WS and OOBWS. So, they randomly (every CS does it differently) go to IA, which means OOBWS are also not getting the love. Every CS who has talked to me and a manager complain about the OOBWS wildcard. You have probably noticed that is where CS goes to IA. In this case causation and correlation are the same.

Smaller categories probably aren’t seeing this. ATL 320, 737, 7ER are frustrated. Trip assignment is seemingly random and unfair (if we consider seniority “fair”)
Reply
Old 05-10-2023 | 02:19 PM
  #27  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,426
Likes: 427
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Good. Surely you are aware that others do not follow your approach.

Let’s talk about the problem. We have 643 320B’s in ATL. If half that number had slips in each step of coverage would run 4 hours during the day and 21 hours at night. Guessing that many slips are not in, but CS tells me it is running four hours to get through WS and OOBWS. So, they randomly (every CS does it differently) go to IA, which means OOBWS are also not getting the love. Every CS who has talked to me and a manager complain about the OOBWS wildcard. You have probably noticed that is where CS goes to IA. In this case causation and correlation are the same.

Smaller categories probably aren’t seeing this. ATL 320, 737, 7ER are frustrated. Trip assignment is seemingly random and unfair (if we consider seniority “fair”)

A good case for why batch sizes should be a percentage based on the number of pilots in the category. I'd rather see that vs a blanket change for everyone. Or they could staff the airline for the schedule they want to fly...
Reply
Old 05-10-2023 | 03:07 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
A good case for why batch sizes should be a percentage based on the number of pilots in the category. I'd rather see that vs a blanket change for everyone. Or they could staff the airline for the schedule they want to fly...
Blasphemy! Reserves who don’t fly 1 minute short of guarantee are major money drain on the company!
Reply
Old 05-17-2023 | 01:51 PM
  #29  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,229
Likes: 677
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Good. Surely you are aware that others do not follow your approach.

Let’s talk about the problem. We have 643 320B’s in ATL. If half that number had slips in each step of coverage would run 4 hours during the day and 21 hours at night. Guessing that many slips are not in, but CS tells me it is running four hours to get through WS and OOBWS. So, they randomly (every CS does it differently) go to IA, which means OOBWS are also not getting the love. Every CS who has talked to me and a manager complain about the OOBWS wildcard. You have probably noticed that is where CS goes to IA. In this case causation and correlation are the same.

Smaller categories probably aren’t seeing this. ATL 320, 737, 7ER are frustrated. Trip assignment is seemingly random and unfair (if we consider seniority “fair”)
It didn't used to be a problem. The change was making everything a proffer. Good luck changing that. This is a staffing issue pure and simple. Delta is the problem not OOBWSs.
Reply
Old 05-17-2023 | 04:40 PM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 41
From: 765A
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
There is no cutting in line. Those OOBWS trips are available to inbase pilots as a WS first. Then out of base. If it's still not covered then it goes GS.
in base greenslips should go before out of base white slips.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Longhornmaniac8
Republic Airways
378
12-23-2024 04:57 PM
flyingfarmer
United
32
03-01-2012 05:04 AM
djrogs03
Regional
338
09-01-2011 05:04 PM
SenoraK
Regional
18
07-29-2011 01:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices