CBreezy |
01-11-2024 08:09 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3749530)
I don't favor 67. I think 65 was the sweet spot between being fair and a decline in ability to multitask and handle complex situations. What I do find odd however is the current group of pilots screaming about the loss of what would probably be a year to 14 months of career advancement. I find it odd because pilots hired post 2007 have seen a unheard of level of advancement. They will also enjoy a retirement probably triple pilots who have retired in the last 5 years.
|
I'm opposed to the money grab. The guys lobbying hardest, most of whom were hired in their mid-to-late 20s, are jealous of those hired in the last few years, that anyone else is going to have it as good or better than they had it. They see how good the newest generation of pilots MIGHT have it (might because we are one tech advance or one recession away from chaos) and are trying to skim some cheese off the top of their good fortune. "Hey, you guys are going to have it so good. How about you give me a little something something for my trouble." No. Pull yourself up by your bootstraps and sail off into the setting sun. We are all down here trying to learn from your mistakes (poor planning in retirement and in relationships and family planning) and saving as much as we can before the 2nd shoe drops...which is imminent.
|