|
Originally Posted by Nantonaku
(Post 3749574)
Okay, sure, you are right and I’m wrong. You are right about everything on here. You have never been wrong about anything. You should take all your wisdom
you write on this forum and write a book. God knows it would be a way better use of your time. |
He was off by about a decade. 2017 instead of 2007. An argument could be made for 2014, maybe. A one off super junior NYC NB A award in 2012 is not opportunity for all.
|
[QUOTE=CaptKochblauch;3749458]Someone sent this letter to me, which apparently the old guys are attempting to circulate in Washington. I recognize some names on here, including guys who have been retired for years and years...and have zero skin in the game. And a couple of current reps.
Their point so abysmally argued, that I have doubts about its legitimacy. The premise of this letter seems to be "our careers did not meet our expectations, so we deserve more time! Waaaaa!" Typical of that generation. I'm sure fiftysome washed up ALPA "has-beens" "wannabees" and "never-weres" will move the needle./s This is my favorite line: "As a pilot moves up in seniority, so does their position on the flight deck, with commensurate pay and benefits." Translation: "We want to move the goalposts and give ourselves two more years at the highest seniority we will ever hold." My friend's dad had a horrible career with non-skeds, finally got on at a legacy at 60 years old. He definitely wants another 2 years, there are a lot more of these type of situations then you might think. |
Originally Posted by Nantonaku
(Post 3749574)
Okay, sure, you are right and I’m wrong. You are right about everything on here. You have never been wrong about anything. You should take all your wisdom
you write on this forum and write a book. God knows it would be a way better use of your time. And I am going to write a book on a study from here. It's called Ad Hominem: How the rate of usage of the logical fallacy is directly proportional how often a person grossly wrong about a subject. I've also started a new study looking at the reasons why people lash out instead of acknowledging that their logic might be full of holes. |
Originally Posted by CaptKochblauch
(Post 3749458)
Someone sent this letter to me, which apparently the old guys are attempting to circulate in Washington. I recognize some names on here, including guys who have been retired for years and years...and have zero skin in the game. And a couple of current reps.
Their point so abysmally argued, that I have doubts about its legitimacy. The premise of this letter seems to be "our careers did not meet our expectations, so we deserve more time! Waaaaa!" Typical of that generation. I'm sure fiftysome washed up ALPA "has-beens" "wannabees" and "never-weres" will move the needle./s This is my favorite line: "As a pilot moves up in seniority, so does their position on the flight deck, with commensurate pay and benefits." Translation: "We want to move the goalposts and give ourselves two more years at the highest seniority we will ever hold." I love how they all attached their titles, as if anyone in Congress knows or cares what they mean. A real union would kick these clowns out PDQ. I highlighted the two current reps who signed in case anyone in Captain Forbes's or Captains Johnson's councils wants to have a talk with them. |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3749509)
March cannot come quickly enough.
|
Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
(Post 3749607)
Can we get him removed sooner? Going against ALPA and against the pilot group while still holding elected office seems pretty egregious.
|
Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
(Post 3749607)
Can we get him removed sooner? Going against ALPA and against the pilot group while still holding elected office seems pretty egregious.
|
Too many cooks in the kitchen
|
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 3749548)
By choice you say. Not correct. How much did you make in year 4 and what year was that?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:51 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands