Airline Pilot Central Forums
Page 9 of 19
« First
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Who Are These Kooks? Is This For Real? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/145882-who-these-kooks-real.html)

DWC CAP10 USAF 01-12-2024 12:32 PM
Originally Posted by interceptorpilo (Post 3750262)
When I said ALPA I meant the membership of ALPA. Yes I do believe that would require a vote and I bet it would pass.
Except age 67 resolutions have failed at every single LEC meeting…and that was before hiring 5000 pilots I’ve the last two years.

Any chance of it passing died when almost 2,000 older pilots took the VEOP.

FangsF15 01-12-2024 12:38 PM
Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF (Post 3750388)
Except age 67 resolutions have failed at every single LEC meeting…and that was before hiring 5000 pilots I’ve the last two years.

Any chance of it passing died when almost 2,000 older pilots took the VEOP.
I think he means IF 67 passed congress, the resolution to get a bunch of quids from the company in exchange for solving the 'ICAO training problem' would go to membership ratification and would pass. I think.

chrisreedrules 01-12-2024 01:09 PM
67 ain’t happening. Even if the FAA Reauthorization Bill includes it, the individual unions at each airline can shoot it down via several mechanisms. These pro-67 guys are essentially peeing into the wind.

m3113n1a1 01-12-2024 01:12 PM
Originally Posted by FangsF15 (Post 3750394)
I think he means IF 67 passed congress, the resolution to get a bunch of quids from the company in exchange for solving the 'ICAO training problem' would go to membership ratification and would pass. I think.
Depends how sweet the deal is obviously. Everything is negotiable.
​​​​​​

dbrownie 01-12-2024 01:51 PM
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules (Post 3750418)
67 ain’t happening. Even if the FAA Reauthorization Bill includes it, the individual unions at each airline can shoot it down via several mechanisms. These pro-67 guys are essentially peeing into the wind.
Not what happened last time... but ok what's changed?

JamesBond 01-12-2024 02:15 PM
Originally Posted by CBreezy (Post 3749867)
If 67 is passed and we can't legally institute our own retirement age of 65, we would be bound to fight for them to get paid to sit at home.
And would you be opposed to that?

JamesBond 01-12-2024 02:17 PM
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules (Post 3750418)
67 ain’t happening. Even if the FAA Reauthorization Bill includes it, the individual unions at each airline can shoot it down via several mechanisms. These pro-67 guys are essentially peeing into the wind.
Show your work here please.

myrkridia 01-12-2024 02:39 PM
Originally Posted by JamesBond (Post 3750460)
And would you be opposed to that?
​​​​​wasnt the whole point to alleviate staffing and allow experienced pilots to fly? How does having WB pilots sitting at home work toward that goal?

Gunfighter 01-12-2024 02:41 PM
Originally Posted by JamesBond (Post 3750460)
And would you be opposed to that?
Yes, because the rest of us will be paying for it for the remainder of our careers. It makes about as much sense as a payday loan.
​​​​​

Viper25 01-12-2024 02:46 PM
Originally Posted by myrkridia (Post 3750478)
​​​​​wasnt the whole point to alleviate staffing and allow experienced pilots to fly? How does having WB pilots sitting at home work toward that goal?
Bingo. Filler


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:47 PM.
Page 9 of 19
« First
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands