Search

Notices

C44 Recall

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2024 | 07:40 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2022
Posts: 21
Likes: 1
Default C44 Recall

Is it true that a pilot requested that a recall be discussed at the next meeting, and that the C44 chairman created a set of non-prodecural hurdles to try to manipulate the process?
Reply
Old 05-24-2024 | 07:55 AM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 381
Likes: 2
From: 737B
Default

Originally Posted by CaptKochblauch
Is it true that a pilot requested that a recall be discussed at the next meeting, and that the C44 chairman created a set of non-prodecural hurdles to try to manipulate the process?
would this surprise you in any way?
Reply
Old 05-24-2024 | 08:47 AM
  #3  
Line Holder
Veteran: Navy
5 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 236
Default

Originally Posted by CaptKochblauch
Is it true that a pilot requested that a recall be discussed at the next meeting, and that the C44 chairman created a set of non-prodecural hurdles to try to manipulate the process?
Yes

10char..
Reply
Old 05-24-2024 | 08:50 AM
  #4  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,099
Likes: 1,047
Default

Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey
Yes

10char..
That won’t play well with the masses. Folks don’t like to get played with silly games and maneuvers.
Reply
Old 05-24-2024 | 08:57 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,467
Likes: 144
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by CaptKochblauch
Is it true that a pilot requested that a recall be discussed at the next meeting, and that the C44 chairman created a set of non-prodecural hurdles to try to manipulate the process?
Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey
Yes

10char..
Saw this on FB. What a mess. After the newspaper debacle I was already hoping those 6 reps would get recalled, but this is just another reason why this needs to happen

has it been shared what the hurdles are?
Reply
Old 05-24-2024 | 09:19 AM
  #6  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CaptKochblauch
Is it true that a pilot requested that a recall be discussed at the next meeting, and that the C44 chairman created a set of non-prodecural hurdles to try to manipulate the process?

He's too busy reading the paper....
Reply
Old 05-24-2024 | 10:14 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
Saw this on FB. What a mess. After the newspaper debacle I was already hoping those 6 reps would get recalled, but this is just another reason why this needs to happen

has it been shared what the hurdles are?
A C44 pilot in good standing followed the required procedure of requesting to have an agenda item (introducing motion to recall) to the next C44 council meeting. That's the only requirement per ALPA National and ALPA Constitution and Bylaws. The C44 Chairman told him that the full text of the motion is required and set an arbitrary deadline of today. The actual deadline per ALPA rules is 15 days prior to the meeting. Not sure if that's business days or actual days but a moot point since the meeting isn't until July.
So the C44 Chair is just making **** up as he goes in an effort to save his ass and that of the other reps.
My prediction is that DH the MEC chair sits idly by and does nothing. It might require getting ALPA legal involved to compel Archer to do his effing job per the ALPA rules.
This my friends is emblematic of deep rooted corruption. Time to clean the damn house.
Reply
Old 05-24-2024 | 10:16 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,363
Likes: 904
Default

Originally Posted by flyingagain
A C44 pilot in good standing followed the required procedure of requesting to have an agenda item (introducing motion to recall) to the next C44 council meeting. That's the only requirement per ALPA National and ALPA Constitution and Bylaws. The C44 Chairman told him that the full text of the motion is required and set an arbitrary deadline of today. The actual deadline per ALPA rules is 15 days prior to the meeting. Not sure if that's business days or actual days but a moot point since the meeting isn't until July.
So the C44 Chair is just making **** up as he goes in an effort to save his ass and that of the other reps.
My prediction is that DH the MEC chair sits idly by and does nothing. It might require getting ALPA legal involved to compel Archer to do his effing job per the ALPA rules.
This my friends is emblematic of deep rooted corruption. Time to clean the damn house.
Maybe he should vote himself another raise for all the hard work writing his own rules
Reply
Old 05-24-2024 | 11:23 AM
  #9  
StoneQOLdCrazy's Avatar
Bent over by buybacks
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 454
Default

Originally Posted by flyingagain
. It might require getting ALPA legal involved to compel Archer to do his effing job per the ALPA rules.
This my friends is emblematic of deep rooted corruption. Time to clean the damn house.
From the alpa website, it looks like the guy to contact is "Capt. Sean Creed, Vice President–Administration/Secretary," if he uses the same alpa email format as everyone else it would be [email protected]
Reply
Old 05-24-2024 | 11:29 AM
  #10  
HelloNewnan's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 290
Likes: 71
Default

Originally Posted by flyingagain
A C44 pilot in good standing followed the required procedure of requesting to have an agenda item (introducing motion to recall) to the next C44 council meeting. That's the only requirement per ALPA National and ALPA Constitution and Bylaws. The C44 Chairman told him that the full text of the motion is required and set an arbitrary deadline of today. The actual deadline per ALPA rules is 15 days prior to the meeting. Not sure if that's business days or actual days but a moot point since the meeting isn't until July.
So the C44 Chair is just making **** up as he goes in an effort to save his ass and that of the other reps.
My prediction is that DH the MEC chair sits idly by and does nothing. It might require getting ALPA legal involved to compel Archer to do his effing job per the ALPA rules.
This my friends is emblematic of deep rooted corruption. Time to clean the damn house.
Not to address the main complaint, but the MEC chair has nothing to do with council business. There is literally no mechanism for any MEC officer involvement in any council affairs, nor would you want it that way, unless that officer was acting as an individual member and happened to be a member of that council.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boeing Aviator
=> United Contract 2022
5
08-18-2022 09:15 AM
AlettaOcean
United
204
07-22-2022 09:02 AM
orvil
Delta
27
02-03-2017 03:03 PM
gzsg
Delta
2
11-02-2015 12:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices