Originally Posted by CBreezy (Post 3960256)

I'm not clicking on a rage bait spam article. Those are not facts. They are editorialized and not peer reviewed. Everything you just said is either a red herring or stawman presented as a digital gish gallop

Originally Posted by CBreezy (Post 3960256)

I'm not clicking on a rage bait spam article. Those are not facts. They are editorialized and not peer reviewed. Everything you just said is either a red herring or stawman presented as a digital gish gallop

Originally Posted by Tailhookah (Post 3960257)

Not what I said. But that’s good. Keep up the good work.

Originally Posted by velosnow (Post 3960259)

Probably not worth engaging with someone who isn't either genuine or just trolling. Bringing in 'greenhadi' and other weird bits just tells me it will go nowhere fast.

Originally Posted by Tailhookah (Post 3960252)

Defending big gubment like a good socialist. NOAA and NASA have expanded well beyond their original mission statement. They’re bloated and dysfunctional. Oh my god (says the greenhadi), they’ve cut NOAA! We wont see the hurricanes coming and we will all die. The Orangeman is truly evil! (That’s also sarcasm…. I love the Orangeman).

Originally Posted by Tailhookah (Post 3960308)

Because I want my lights to work w/out blackouts Im anti-environmental? That’s the problem w/ this whole discussion. I triggered some of you by saying wind energy doesn’t work well…. The rest is history. Good luck w/ wind. I live in coal country. No blackouts here. Enjoyed the discussion.

Originally Posted by Tailhookah (Post 3960308)

Because I want my lights to work w/out blackouts Im anti-environmental? That’s the problem w/ this whole discussion. I triggered some of you by saying wind energy doesn’t work well…. The rest is history. Good luck w/ wind. I live in coal country. No blackouts here. Enjoyed the discussion.

Originally Posted by Meme In Command (Post 3959858)

Oh look, it's the tried and true devolution of renewable energy discourse into hippie earth saving granola bullsh!t and once again never speaking in terms of national security and energy independence.

Yawn...

Funny how China is covering their landscape in solar panels though. Yes, famous tree hugging hippies: THE CHINESE. The CCP folded to the environmentalist "Save the Pangolin!" Campaign...:D

But the way, all for nuclear energy. Split baby split! (As in the atom)

Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo (Post 3960184)

I recently went to visit Plymouth Rock. I have ancestors that came over on the Mayflower. It was a fun trip. I also noticed that the plymouth rock at high tide wasn't under water. Heck the water barely touches the base of it. So if there is a warming and melting of ice caps, shouldn't the sea also be rising? I read about this all the time yet here is this rock, circa like 1620 or so, and it's not underwater at high tide (it was a king tide too). The water barely touched the base of it. Locals said it's been like that for as long as they can remember for generations.