Search

Notices

Openers today?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2026 | 12:20 PM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 353
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by dtfl
Lets not forget, “PEB! PEB!” and

"Joe the Math Guy"

and the other Gold loving guy that smacked the pole in BNA in the Mad Dog…very combative. Ron something
Mullis. Called everyone rocket surgeons. Still on the seniority list.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 12:23 PM
  #22  
Gunfighter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
1M Airline Miles
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,653
Likes: 681
Default

Originally Posted by jaxsurf
Also, I especially don’t want a ‘short term agreement’ due to how the company puts the screws on every time it’s closed to openers. I don’t want to deal with that every 12 or 24 months. Dealing with it every 36 or 48 months is bad enough.
This is the best logic against a short-term agreement I've seen.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 12:23 PM
  #23  
20Fathoms's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 179
Default

Honest question: Why is ALPA pushing for a short term agreement vs a normal contract period? What is the benefit to the pilot group?

Also where did they get that idea? I highly doubt it was from the contract survey…..

I’ll keep my powder dry till I see it, but I am also deeply suspicious of any TA announced early in the process. It brings back bad memories of Donatelli and his “6 months early and the best contact in the history of the world!! BS”

(For those that weren’t here at the time, in 2015 DALPA and the company signed a TA 6 months early and ALPA sold it like a used car salesman. It ended up getting rejected by the pilot group and we got a better deal a year and a half later).
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 12:26 PM
  #24  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 80
Likes: 61
Default

I get that this is meant to be a short term deal, and thus not as in-depth, but there was nothing about

Health insurance
Sick improvements
Reserve Rules
Extra vacation week to match United
Penalties for incorrect pay

And I'm sure there are others I am not thinking about.

I feel like this TA is already doomed to fail.
Old 04-06-2026 | 12:27 PM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 642
Likes: 28
Default

Instead of framing it as “giving up” auto accept, how about we just let the company and the union redesign the system in a fair and modern way instead of this archaic 1980s crap that only benefits 23M farmers and leaves anyone hoping for a GS or WS in the dust. There should be a way to fairly dole out premium flying with the tech we have in 2026.
Old 04-06-2026 | 12:29 PM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 236
Likes: 13
From: pj's and coffee
Default

1. Don’t negotiate in public.

2. It’s literally opener exchange day and guys are already saying they don’t like the approach. GMAFB. Wind your watch for a hot minute and see what develops before summarily deciding you don’t support our negotiating committee.

3. That all said: I didn’t expect to get the actual opener verbatim in my email (see #1), but that was underwhelming after the lead up from ALPA. I for one hope they beef up the “why” explanations behind the rationale to go this path in the weeks that follow.
Old 04-06-2026 | 12:29 PM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 202
Likes: 114
Default

Originally Posted by 20Fathoms
Honest question: Why is ALPA pushing for a short term agreement vs a normal contract period? What is the benefit to the pilot group?

Also where did they get that idea? I highly doubt it was from the contract survey…..

I’ll keep my powder dry till I see it, but I am also deeply suspicious of any TA announced early in the process. It brings back bad memories of Donatelli and his “6 months early and the best contact in the history of the world!! BS”

(For those that weren’t here at the time, in 2015 DALPA and the company signed a TA 6 months early and ALPA sold it like a used car salesman. It ended up getting rejected by the pilot group and we got a better deal a year and a half later).
the company is screwed right now, see FlightAware cancellations yesterday and today, because they are critically understaffed, and part of their problem is the trip coverage process. In the long term, they can hire their way out of it, but in the short term, the only thing they can do to solve it is negotiate with us. Solving their problems now is a lot more valuable to them than solving them in the future, which means more value for us too. If the company doesn’t play ball with a VERY good, focused deal, then we can pursue normal negotiations.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 12:36 PM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 415
Likes: 72
Default

Originally Posted by HockeyGuy
I get that this is meant to be a short term deal, and thus not as in-depth, but there was nothing about

Health insurance
Sick improvements
Reserve Rules
Extra vacation week to match United
Penalties for incorrect pay

And I'm sure there are others I am not thinking about.

I feel like this TA is already doomed to fail.

But “increase instructor protections” is on the short list. I’m a little confused.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 12:36 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,187
Likes: 670
Default

Originally Posted by HockeyGuy
I get that this is meant to be a short term deal, and thus not as in-depth, but there was nothing about

Health insurance
Sick improvements
Reserve Rules
Extra vacation week to match United
Penalties for incorrect pay

And I'm sure there are others I am not thinking about.

I feel like this TA is already doomed to fail.
Yeah, interesting "opener." Like you said, a lot missing from it. Comparing it to the very specific opener from C2019, it's definitely underwhelming, but perhaps intentionally vague. The short term deal aspect of this seems risky to me. I don't want to have a dragged out multi-year negotiating process just to ink a 2 year deal. I also don't think the company, and perhaps the union, realize just how disillusioned and upset with the company that the average line pilot is these days.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 12:37 PM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 610
Likes: 123
Default

Originally Posted by 20Fathoms
Honest question: Why is ALPA pushing for a short term agreement vs a normal contract period? What is the benefit to the pilot group?

Also where did they get that idea? I highly doubt it was from the contract survey…..

I’ll keep my powder dry till I see it, but I am also deeply suspicious of any TA announced early in the process. It brings back bad memories of Donatelli and his “6 months early and the best contact in the history of the world!! BS”

(For those that weren’t here at the time, in 2015 DALPA and the company signed a TA 6 months early and ALPA sold it like a used car salesman. It ended up getting rejected by the pilot group and we got a better deal a year and a half later).
The only issue with your memory is that THIS MEC and MC is the exact opposite of the TA1 crew. Read: not in bed with mgmt. No DC3 photo.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satpak77
Military
11
10-07-2011 02:53 PM
SrfNFly227
Regional
48
06-11-2009 09:02 PM
jungle
Money Talk
2
02-19-2009 07:50 PM
Longbow64
Flight Schools and Training
18
12-19-2007 05:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices