Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Delta Flight Cancellations >

Delta Flight Cancellations

Search

Notices

Delta Flight Cancellations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2026 | 06:18 PM
  #181  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2024
Posts: 306
Likes: 153
Default

Originally Posted by Delta757
I think we are talking in circles and aren't going to ever agree. They should have hired more pilots. They should use the plethora of tools available to them. They shouldn't have gutted crew scheduling and made it so miserable it's full of new hires. Fix that and you could have every pilot auto accept everything and they'd still be able to cover things.

​​​​​​
Agreed, except for something to add on the last sentence. Cover, yes. Get rid of 23M7 payments, no. A trip pops up inside 18 hours, it still will cause a 23m7 payment even if you hire a million pilots. In fact it will make it worse because you will have more pilots on the payroll to put auto accept in and it will take longer to get through that step of coverage. It’s just math.

The coverage ladder is going to have to change or auto accept will have to change
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 06:19 PM
  #182  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 386
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Grimes
Please name one person in the company or the pilot group who foresaw this fatal flaw when ARCOS was implemented.
Believe me, I'm the last person that wants to see a head on a spike over this. But I'm positive that the question that you just asked is precisely the same question being asked in the C-suite.
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 06:20 PM
  #183  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,410
Likes: 882
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Grimes
Not trips that show up inside 18 hours.
...and why would so many trips be popping up inside 18 hours? Is there a known historical amount that has changed for some reason? Like an MD-88 with the APU on MEL, it will run a little hot and if not corrected quickly it takes and enormous amount of time and effort to bring it back under control. Fortunately there is the classic solution, throw money at the problem. You attack from several angles like APU maintenance, diligence hooking up ground air, upgrading ground air, keeping kinks out of the hose, leaving the APUs running that do run, closing the shades, pulling jets offline and using another fleet etc.

What you don't do is send out the APU sheriff out on the ramp with a clipboard to check off:

<APU running> N *good job (10 attaboy point awarded to the crew)
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 06:25 PM
  #184  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 100
Likes: 172
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Grimes
Agreed, except for something to add on the last sentence. Cover, yes. Get rid of 23M7 payments, no. A trip pops up inside 18 hours, it still will cause a 23m7 payment even if you hire a million pilots. In fact it will make it worse because you will have more pilots on the payroll to put auto accept in and it will take longer to get through that step of coverage. It’s just math.

The coverage ladder is going to have to change or auto accept will have to change
I agree, it will have to. I don't think it's the reason for cancellations but it is not a great system even for us pilots. We have the upper hand and it'll be up to them to pay for their self induced mistakes we warned them about. Maybe undo some of the crap they've been pulling lately.

If they weren't so adversarial this could've been mutually solved a long time ago.
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 06:26 PM
  #185  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2024
Posts: 306
Likes: 153
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
...and why would so many trips be popping up inside 18 hours? Is there a known historical amount that has changed for some reason? Like an MD-88 with the APU on MEL, it tends to get a little hot and if not corrected quickly it takes and enormous amount of time to bring it back under control. Fortunately there is the classic solution, throwing money at the problem. You attack from several angles like APU maintenance, diligence hooking up ground air, upgrading ground air, keeping kinks out of the hose, leaving the APU running, closing the shades, pulling jets offline and using another fleet etc.

What you don't do is send out the APU sheriff to stand on the ramp and check off:

<APU not running> good job.
People get sick, planes break, wx happens. A lot of things happen inside 18 hours

I don’t have the data on historical norms of trips popping up on open time <18 hours, do you?
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 06:36 PM
  #186  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,410
Likes: 882
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Grimes
People get sick, planes break, wx happens. A lot of things happen inside 18 hours

I don’t have the data on historical norms of trips popping up on open time <18 hours, do you?
Just anecdotally... It never used to be a problem. The reinterpretation of 23M7 management thought they had scored with was the fatal flaw. Then they refused to hire or have any self control on batches so a contributing factor was greed, management greed. If 23M7 was never exploited, then none of this would have happened and hiring would have continued at appropriate levels. I know there is data on the GS explosion a few years ago prior to all this. That points to staffing.
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 06:44 PM
  #187  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 176
From: Big ones
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Grimes
Please name one person in the company or the pilot group who foresaw this fatal flaw when ARCOS was implemented.
seriously? SK for one. And plenty of others. Like probably the entire skeds committee. Some of them might even have been lurking or posting on these pages. It wasn’t rocket surgery to think ahead with nuance what ARCOS implementation would bring. The batch size giveaway just confirmed that some high ranking ALPA reps had no idea what they were dealing with at the time.

sorta related: we should include the extra 24(!) hours of trip coverage flexibility we just gave the co in the last contract as another milestone on the road to lighting our current gummster bonfire of vanity. 24 extra hours: that is DOUBLE what they had for decades and still we get calls at 2:45 am for a morning push just because mgt wants to try and cheapen the cost of our labor. No thanks, use the existing tools properly before blaming us for this disaster.
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 06:45 PM
  #188  
Line Holder
Liked
20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 131
Default

Originally Posted by Delta757
Should've used batch sizes.

Should've come to the union a year ago to fix this issue.

100.0% their fault.
​​​​
Wasn't it the MEC Chairman that gave away batch sizes? I see this anger directed towards the company re: batch sizes, but DH gave it up.
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 06:48 PM
  #189  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2024
Posts: 306
Likes: 153
Default

Originally Posted by tripled
seriously? SK for one. And plenty of others. Like probably the entire skeds committee. Some of them might even have been lurking or posting on these pages. It wasn’t rocket surgery to think ahead with nuance what ARCOS implementation would bring. The batch size giveaway just confirmed that some high ranking ALPA reps had no idea what they were dealing with at the time.

sorta related: we should include the extra 24(!) hours of trip coverage flexibility we just gave the co in the last contract as another milestone on the road to lighting our current gummster bonfire of vanity. 24 extra hours: that is DOUBLE what they had for decades and still we get calls at 2:45 am for a morning push just because mgt wants to try and cheapen the cost of our labor. No thanks, use the existing tools properly before blaming us for this disaster.
Please show me any communication from SK or any skeds committee that mentions the threat of the ARCOS system breaking down if too many pilots put in auto accepts.
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 06:49 PM
  #190  
PilotJ3's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,886
Likes: 137
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Grimes
People get sick, planes break, wx happens. A lot of things happen inside 18 hours

I don’t have the data on historical norms of trips popping up on open time <18 hours, do you?
Sounds like you want to change the 18 hr Long call. When we used to have 12hr long call, none of this things happened. It wasn’t because of the long call time, it was because we were properly staffed and scheduling wasn’t playing games with reserves.

I like 18hr long calls. And we didn’t had that issue when we started doing them 2 years ago. Company is at fault…they have the power to fix it…but if is not by next week, this will just keep happening until the contract its ratified or they hire 3,000 pilots.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
crxpilot
Delta
32
02-11-2020 08:44 AM
KennyG1700
Flight Schools and Training
40
08-01-2019 12:53 AM
Time2Fly
Corporate
38
08-11-2010 09:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices