Delta Flight Cancellations
#181
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2024
Posts: 306
Likes: 153
I think we are talking in circles and aren't going to ever agree. They should have hired more pilots. They should use the plethora of tools available to them. They shouldn't have gutted crew scheduling and made it so miserable it's full of new hires. Fix that and you could have every pilot auto accept everything and they'd still be able to cover things.
The coverage ladder is going to have to change or auto accept will have to change
#182
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 386
Believe me, I'm the last person that wants to see a head on a spike over this. But I'm positive that the question that you just asked is precisely the same question being asked in the C-suite.
#183
...and why would so many trips be popping up inside 18 hours? Is there a known historical amount that has changed for some reason? Like an MD-88 with the APU on MEL, it will run a little hot and if not corrected quickly it takes and enormous amount of time and effort to bring it back under control. Fortunately there is the classic solution, throw money at the problem. You attack from several angles like APU maintenance, diligence hooking up ground air, upgrading ground air, keeping kinks out of the hose, leaving the APUs running that do run, closing the shades, pulling jets offline and using another fleet etc.
What you don't do is send out the APU sheriff out on the ramp with a clipboard to check off:
<APU running> N *good job (10 attaboy point awarded to the crew)
What you don't do is send out the APU sheriff out on the ramp with a clipboard to check off:
<APU running> N *good job (10 attaboy point awarded to the crew)
#184
On Reserve
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 100
Likes: 172
Agreed, except for something to add on the last sentence. Cover, yes. Get rid of 23M7 payments, no. A trip pops up inside 18 hours, it still will cause a 23m7 payment even if you hire a million pilots. In fact it will make it worse because you will have more pilots on the payroll to put auto accept in and it will take longer to get through that step of coverage. It’s just math.
The coverage ladder is going to have to change or auto accept will have to change
The coverage ladder is going to have to change or auto accept will have to change
If they weren't so adversarial this could've been mutually solved a long time ago.
#185
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2024
Posts: 306
Likes: 153
...and why would so many trips be popping up inside 18 hours? Is there a known historical amount that has changed for some reason? Like an MD-88 with the APU on MEL, it tends to get a little hot and if not corrected quickly it takes and enormous amount of time to bring it back under control. Fortunately there is the classic solution, throwing money at the problem. You attack from several angles like APU maintenance, diligence hooking up ground air, upgrading ground air, keeping kinks out of the hose, leaving the APU running, closing the shades, pulling jets offline and using another fleet etc.
What you don't do is send out the APU sheriff to stand on the ramp and check off:
<APU not running> good job.
What you don't do is send out the APU sheriff to stand on the ramp and check off:
<APU not running> good job.
I don’t have the data on historical norms of trips popping up on open time <18 hours, do you?
#186
Just anecdotally... It never used to be a problem. The reinterpretation of 23M7 management thought they had scored with was the fatal flaw. Then they refused to hire or have any self control on batches so a contributing factor was greed, management greed. If 23M7 was never exploited, then none of this would have happened and hiring would have continued at appropriate levels. I know there is data on the GS explosion a few years ago prior to all this. That points to staffing.
#187
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 176
From: Big ones
sorta related: we should include the extra 24(!) hours of trip coverage flexibility we just gave the co in the last contract as another milestone on the road to lighting our current gummster bonfire of vanity. 24 extra hours: that is DOUBLE what they had for decades and still we get calls at 2:45 am for a morning push just because mgt wants to try and cheapen the cost of our labor. No thanks, use the existing tools properly before blaming us for this disaster.
#188
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 131
#189
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2024
Posts: 306
Likes: 153
seriously? SK for one. And plenty of others. Like probably the entire skeds committee. Some of them might even have been lurking or posting on these pages. It wasn’t rocket surgery to think ahead with nuance what ARCOS implementation would bring. The batch size giveaway just confirmed that some high ranking ALPA reps had no idea what they were dealing with at the time.
sorta related: we should include the extra 24(!) hours of trip coverage flexibility we just gave the co in the last contract as another milestone on the road to lighting our current gummster bonfire of vanity. 24 extra hours: that is DOUBLE what they had for decades and still we get calls at 2:45 am for a morning push just because mgt wants to try and cheapen the cost of our labor. No thanks, use the existing tools properly before blaming us for this disaster.
sorta related: we should include the extra 24(!) hours of trip coverage flexibility we just gave the co in the last contract as another milestone on the road to lighting our current gummster bonfire of vanity. 24 extra hours: that is DOUBLE what they had for decades and still we get calls at 2:45 am for a morning push just because mgt wants to try and cheapen the cost of our labor. No thanks, use the existing tools properly before blaming us for this disaster.
#190
I like 18hr long calls. And we didn’t had that issue when we started doing them 2 years ago. Company is at fault…they have the power to fix it…but if is not by next week, this will just keep happening until the contract its ratified or they hire 3,000 pilots.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



