Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Alex, Geddy, and Neil hammering away. Learning to play La Villa Strangiato myself.
the thing about private aircraft tax deductions it's really not a simple as it used to be to write off the entire airplane. I used to have to keep a log of who had been on the jet and why and hand it over to aviation tax attorneys to do a bunch of calculations on. There was also a question about whether you had active or passive income and that determined if you could write it off and when they made that change a whole lot of owners lost the ability to write their jets off. Pardon me though, im trying to remember back six years ago on this stuff.
Don't forget you do pay a lot in property taxes on multi million dollar jets and in Florida it's really expensive. So much so they record how long private jets remain in Florida and if it hits a threshold they come after you for property taxes even if the airplane is not based there.
But ending the tax write off, which I understand completely is tough to accept, would probably shut down Gulfstream, Cessna, Piper, Learjet, Beechcraft/Hawker, Bombardier and a lot of other manufacturers over night as well as their vendors and suppliers, maintenance providers and so on. There might still be jets, but rarely would they be new. It could happen, but I think it would create a loss in taxes paid to the government and not an increase.
Don't forget you do pay a lot in property taxes on multi million dollar jets and in Florida it's really expensive. So much so they record how long private jets remain in Florida and if it hits a threshold they come after you for property taxes even if the airplane is not based there.
But ending the tax write off, which I understand completely is tough to accept, would probably shut down Gulfstream, Cessna, Piper, Learjet, Beechcraft/Hawker, Bombardier and a lot of other manufacturers over night as well as their vendors and suppliers, maintenance providers and so on. There might still be jets, but rarely would they be new. It could happen, but I think it would create a loss in taxes paid to the government and not an increase.
Shrink the government.
Cut unearned entitlements.
"Pay as you go" taxes cant be raided for other projects.
What we have now is cuts to programs that people have paid for and that taxpayers will feel. If you cut programs that people don't pay for, there will be incentive for people to go back to work. If the answer is to keep taking from those who work, there will never be a solution, but instead a deepening problem.
When people can "retire" from the workforce because they choose to use drugs (drug addicts, federally, are defined as disabled) they get paid to stay in a government supplied house, to go to government supplied programs, to eat government supplied food and wear government supplied clothes, recieve government supplied education, etc. They have 24 hours/ day to continue to conduct illicit activities - either further earning illegal money or whatever.
We would be on the right track if we started to do away will all such ridiculous programs.
As far as towers and airport infrastructure, taxes and fees are already on the books. Quit diverting those to non-performing programs and then let's see where we are.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 1
From: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.

Possible fix?
I think you and I are somewhat on the same page except for raising taxes on people by 10%.
Shrink the government.
Cut unearned entitlements.
"Pay as you go" taxes cant be raided for other projects.
What we have now is cuts to programs that people have paid for and that taxpayers will feel. If you cut programs that people don't pay for, there will be incentive for people to go back to work. If the answer is to keep taking from those who work, there will never be a solution, but instead a deepening problem.
When people can "retire" from the workforce because they choose to use drugs (drug addicts, federally, are defined as disabled) they get paid to stay in a government supplied house, to go to government supplied programs, to eat government supplied food and wear government supplied clothes, recieve government supplied education, etc. They have 24 hours/ day to continue to conduct illicit activities - either further earning illegal money or whatever.
We would be on the right track if we started to do away will all such ridiculous programs.
As far as towers and airport infrastructure, taxes and fees are already on the books. Quit diverting those to non-performing programs and then let's see where we are.
Shrink the government.
Cut unearned entitlements.
"Pay as you go" taxes cant be raided for other projects.
What we have now is cuts to programs that people have paid for and that taxpayers will feel. If you cut programs that people don't pay for, there will be incentive for people to go back to work. If the answer is to keep taking from those who work, there will never be a solution, but instead a deepening problem.
When people can "retire" from the workforce because they choose to use drugs (drug addicts, federally, are defined as disabled) they get paid to stay in a government supplied house, to go to government supplied programs, to eat government supplied food and wear government supplied clothes, recieve government supplied education, etc. They have 24 hours/ day to continue to conduct illicit activities - either further earning illegal money or whatever.
We would be on the right track if we started to do away will all such ridiculous programs.
As far as towers and airport infrastructure, taxes and fees are already on the books. Quit diverting those to non-performing programs and then let's see where we are.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
I've made thousands of dollars in dividends over the past 20 years of which I only paid 15% tax on. In the grand scheme of things, it's probably not fair to someone paying much more than that in Federal, state, and Medicare.
Long time Rush fan here...I saw them live last year in Dallas for the first time... Disappointed. Geddy's singing was pretty bad. My wife complains about me singing at church, he wasn't much better. BUT Neil - that Mofo can play some drums. Big long drum solo on the jumbotron from overhead. It was just amazing. He's got a massive drumset and uses every piece...WOW. Still love recorded Rush and have every CD except the new one.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Who says he is deducting or depreciating his aircraft? I have no idea so won't make assumptions, however, if it's a business tool, why not?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
From: Permanently scarred
Dividends typically come from stock ownership. if you own stock you own part of the company. The company pays taxes on its profits, and dividends are some of those profits that have already been taxed. You're paying way more than 15%. You're just looking at the side of it that shows up on your 1099. It's more than fair, no matter how Warren wants to paint it to get his back scratched.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





