![]() |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 673934)
I agree, I would like to see the DC bumped up a lot. I would like to see most pilots hit the max every year. It is something that needs to be looked at.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 674260)
4 Sept 09 code a phone.
Am I missing something? |
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 674309)
I can't find anything in Dickson's Weekly Update on that date that mentions furloughs or anything about our staffing, other than the North AE.
Am I missing something? By the end of 2010 we're likely to be even closer to the recovery or continue on the slow uptick in the economy on top of the fact that by that point we're going to be 3 years into the age 65 change. The closer and closer we get to 5 years after the change the more and more retirements we will see. Projecting whether there will be furloughs over a year and a half from now is kinda jumping the gun a bit. A year and a half in this industry is an eternity. time will tell |
iaflyer and Super,
Pilot I was flying with had a copy of the code a phone which printed over the margin. The "not" was cut off his copy, so it read "contemplating furloughs" as opposed to "not contemplating furloughs." Good news, my bad! |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 673793)
Bar, When did you hear Steve Dickson say they are contemplating furloughs after 2010?
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 674350)
iaflyer and Super,
Pilot I was flying with had a copy of the code a phone which printed over the margin. The "not" was cut off his copy, so it read "contemplating furloughs" as opposed to "not contemplating furloughs." Good news, my bad! |
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 674004)
Amen brother. Its embarrassing. I thought LA was supposed to be "one of the goal posts." So far, its just a sleepy little FBO as far as DAL is concerned.
Again, I dont see the big picture I guess but I definitely dont understand it. Talked to the Network guy on the roadshow or whatever its called, and he basically said we are making money with Alaska feeding us...... "Premier global airline" with basically 6 East coast Bases and 2 (3 if you count SEA) west coast bases..... |
Originally Posted by Chente
(Post 674372)
Amen and amen to both of you guys! I dont get it, I mean I dont understand the economics behind the whole code share with Alaska or the fact that maybe Delta doesnt want to "compete" with Alaska or Southwest on the west coast but I have been saying that for awhile....We are "The premier global airline" yet we cant fly LAX-SEA, LAX-SFO, LAX-DFW, LAX-ORD, etc etc on Delta!?!?
Again, I dont see the big picture I guess but I definitely dont understand it. Talked to the Network guy on the roadshow or whatever its called, and he basically said we are making money with Alaska feeding us...... "Premier global airline" with basically 6 East coast Bases and 2 (3 if you count SEA) west coast bases..... BD |
Originally Posted by bigdaddie
(Post 674392)
Ah, SLC is like 500 miles from the coast so I wouldn't include it as a West Coast base. Hear that Bubba? The Rockies do not boarder the Pacific!
BD |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 674257)
Hence, why I like "temporary duty assignments" better than flow down.
There are many way and angles to look at this. Ideas are good. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:46 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands