Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

RockyBoy 09-06-2009 06:50 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 673934)
I agree, I would like to see the DC bumped up a lot. I would like to see most pilots hit the max every year. It is something that needs to be looked at.

We should create a model that gives a newhire with 30 years of projected employment a DC that will get them close to what the FAE formula gave guys before the plan was lost. To make $150K in todays dollars someone would have to contribute about $42,000 per year for 30 years at 3% inflation and get an annualized returen of 8% to pull 150K during retirement. That is about 35% for most FO's (probably not attainable) and about 21% for most Captains. So if we could get something above 21% and then pitch in some of our own coin while we are FO's to get to the 35% during those years, we could in theory almost restore the retirement plan to those who have around 30 years left. The big mess is how do you resotre it to the deadzoners who don't have that time?

iaflyer 09-06-2009 07:56 PM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 674260)
4 Sept 09 code a phone.

I can't find anything in Dickson's Weekly Update on that date that mentions furloughs or anything about our staffing, other than the North AE.

Am I missing something?

Superpilot92 09-06-2009 08:42 PM


Originally Posted by iaflyer (Post 674309)
I can't find anything in Dickson's Weekly Update on that date that mentions furloughs or anything about our staffing, other than the North AE.

Am I missing something?

+1, I just read the whole thing and the F-Word wasnt mentioned at all let alone staffing post 2010. Bar did you get the secret version of the code-a-phone ;)

By the end of 2010 we're likely to be even closer to the recovery or continue on the slow uptick in the economy on top of the fact that by that point we're going to be 3 years into the age 65 change. The closer and closer we get to 5 years after the change the more and more retirements we will see. Projecting whether there will be furloughs over a year and a half from now is kinda jumping the gun a bit. A year and a half in this industry is an eternity. time will tell

Bucking Bar 09-06-2009 09:17 PM

iaflyer and Super,

Pilot I was flying with had a copy of the code a phone which printed over the margin. The "not" was cut off his copy, so it read "contemplating furloughs" as opposed to "not contemplating furloughs."

Good news, my bad!

Bucking Bar 09-06-2009 09:20 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 673793)
Bar, When did you hear Steve Dickson say they are contemplating furloughs after 2010?

My mistake, as outlined above.

Superpilot92 09-06-2009 09:33 PM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 674350)
iaflyer and Super,

Pilot I was flying with had a copy of the code a phone which printed over the margin. The "not" was cut off his copy, so it read "contemplating furloughs" as opposed to "not contemplating furloughs."

Good news, my bad!

Cheers!!! :D

Chente 09-06-2009 10:26 PM


Originally Posted by buzzpat (Post 674004)
Amen brother. Its embarrassing. I thought LA was supposed to be "one of the goal posts." So far, its just a sleepy little FBO as far as DAL is concerned.

Amen and amen to both of you guys! I dont get it, I mean I dont understand the economics behind the whole code share with Alaska or the fact that maybe Delta doesnt want to "compete" with Alaska or Southwest on the west coast but I have been saying that for awhile....We are "The premier global airline" yet we cant fly LAX-SEA, LAX-SFO, LAX-DFW, LAX-ORD, etc etc on Delta!?!?
Again, I dont see the big picture I guess but I definitely dont understand it. Talked to the Network guy on the roadshow or whatever its called, and he basically said we are making money with Alaska feeding us......
"Premier global airline" with basically 6 East coast Bases and 2 (3 if you count SEA) west coast bases.....

bigdaddie 09-07-2009 01:51 AM


Originally Posted by Chente (Post 674372)
Amen and amen to both of you guys! I dont get it, I mean I dont understand the economics behind the whole code share with Alaska or the fact that maybe Delta doesnt want to "compete" with Alaska or Southwest on the west coast but I have been saying that for awhile....We are "The premier global airline" yet we cant fly LAX-SEA, LAX-SFO, LAX-DFW, LAX-ORD, etc etc on Delta!?!?
Again, I dont see the big picture I guess but I definitely dont understand it. Talked to the Network guy on the roadshow or whatever its called, and he basically said we are making money with Alaska feeding us......
"Premier global airline" with basically 6 East coast Bases and 2 (3 if you count SEA) west coast bases.....

Ah, SLC is like 500 miles from the coast so I wouldn't include it as a West Coast base. Hear that Bubba? The Rockies do not boarder the Pacific!

BD

satchip 09-07-2009 02:46 AM


Originally Posted by bigdaddie (Post 674392)
Ah, SLC is like 500 miles from the coast so I wouldn't include it as a West Coast base. Hear that Bubba? The Rockies do not boarder the Pacific!

BD

Just wait, they will...:D

acl65pilot 09-07-2009 04:04 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 674257)
Hence, why I like "temporary duty assignments" better than flow down.

We could also just assign the CPS guys seniority numbers and that way we have two airlines with DAL seniority numbers. One group two tickets. Sounds like Rjet. We could do it with all of the WO is there was support.

There are many way and angles to look at this. Ideas are good.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands