Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
From: DAL FO
The court Delta would file in would be the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of Georgia. They wouldn't "kick that issue to another court," whatever that means. That's not how the system works. If either side disagrees (which would be inevitable) with the ruling either party is free to appeal to 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Your conclusory opinion is not grounded in the law or fact. You can speculate what a court might do but to say definitively what they would do is naive and irresponsible.
An injunction is not as easy to get as you and sailing seem to think. It's not something that would happen overnight either. There are factors that the court must consider.
Here's some caselaw for you, straight out of the DAL v. ALPA case in 2000:
"A party seeking a preliminary injunction must establish the following four factors: (1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (2) a threat of irreparable injury, (3) that its own injury would outweigh the injury to the nonmovant, and (4) that the injunction would not thwart public interest." Haitian Refugee Ctr., Inc. v. Baker, 949 F.2d 1109, 1110 (11th Cir. 1991)
As another poster already pointed out, DAL could still cover the schedule using short calls and greenslips. The schedule would get flown, it would just be more expensive for them. Hard to argue that injury would be "irreparable" or that such "injury" would outweigh the harm to the pilots of having our PWA rights trashed by memo.
Again, all of this is moot as your union refuses to stand and fight. And, as I've said before, if DAL were successful at getting an injunction, SO WHAT! Neither DALPA nor the 49ers were fined because they did nothing illegal. Completely different from the AA sickout, which was clearly illegal--hence the fine.
Your conclusory opinion is not grounded in the law or fact. You can speculate what a court might do but to say definitively what they would do is naive and irresponsible.
An injunction is not as easy to get as you and sailing seem to think. It's not something that would happen overnight either. There are factors that the court must consider.
Here's some caselaw for you, straight out of the DAL v. ALPA case in 2000:
"A party seeking a preliminary injunction must establish the following four factors: (1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (2) a threat of irreparable injury, (3) that its own injury would outweigh the injury to the nonmovant, and (4) that the injunction would not thwart public interest." Haitian Refugee Ctr., Inc. v. Baker, 949 F.2d 1109, 1110 (11th Cir. 1991)
As another poster already pointed out, DAL could still cover the schedule using short calls and greenslips. The schedule would get flown, it would just be more expensive for them. Hard to argue that injury would be "irreparable" or that such "injury" would outweigh the harm to the pilots of having our PWA rights trashed by memo.
Again, all of this is moot as your union refuses to stand and fight. And, as I've said before, if DAL were successful at getting an injunction, SO WHAT! Neither DALPA nor the 49ers were fined because they did nothing illegal. Completely different from the AA sickout, which was clearly illegal--hence the fine.
Hummm. Why does Delta have to file in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of Georgia? What if the majority of their cancelled flights are in NYC? Also, are you saying that THAT federal court would handle the contract dispute and SD's memo?
Even if they do, what difference does it make? Are you saying the Court would immediately rule on the issue of interpreting what Delta did and not have to issue an injunction in the face of Delta canceling flights?
So, my opinion isn't based in law? Ok. If you say so, but I'm pretty sure this is the opinion the company would use as the framework for it's case against us. The good stuff begins on page 63. I think it's more pertinent than the case law you posted.
https://crewroom.alpa.org/ual/Deskto...cumentID=44168
I also guess we are going to have to agree to disagree on whether or not Delta would be able to fly their schedule with an increase of long call pilots getting PD's for assigned trips. From what I see, Delta is going to have trouble finding pilots for some flights already - especially for the summer. This is without any more of an increase of reserve pilots getting PD'ed from trips.
Finally, your fall back provision of not caring if Delta is successful in getting an injunction against us is problematic. What do you, mean "…so what?"
As, I said before, we have the high ground. Even though it's taking a while, SD's memo is just as impossible to follow as the company believes our contract is to follow under the new 117 rules. Our pilots will be repaid for the PD's. So, why waste time on a losing cause that has a chance to blow up into something worse?
So, what? So, I want to win. What do you want to do?
Last edited by newKnow; 05-15-2014 at 06:30 PM.
Looks like All 717 bids have been pulled and they are re processing them...
Hopefully for the better
Hopefully for the better
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Does the major win includes these increases?
Hummm. Why does Delta have to file in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of Georgia? What if the majority of their cancelled flights are in NYC? Also, are you saying the federal court would handle the contract dispute and SD's memo?
Even if they do, what difference does it make? Are you saying the Court would immediately rule on the issue of interpreting what Delta did and not have to issue an injunction in the face of Delta canceling flights?
So, my opinion isn't based in law? Ok. If you say so, but I'm pretty sure this is the opinion the company would use as the framework for it's case against us. The good stuff begins on page 63. I think it's more pertinent than the case law you posted.
https://crewroom.alpa.org/ual/Deskto...cumentID=44168
I also guess we are going to have to agree to disagree on whether or not Delta would be able to fly their schedule with an increase of long call pilots getting PD's for assigned trips. From what I see, Delta is going to have trouble finding pilots for some flights already - especially for the summer. This is without any more of an increase of reserve pilots getting PD'ed from trips.
Finally, your fall back provision of not caring if Delta is successful in getting an injunction against us is problematic. What do you, mean "…so what?"
As, I said before, we have the high ground. Even though it's taking a while, SD's memo is just as impossible to follow as the company believes our contract is to follow under the new 117 rules. Our pilots will be repaid for the PD's. So, why waste time on a losing cause that has a chance to blow up into something worse?
So, what? So, I want to win. What do you want to do?
Even if they do, what difference does it make? Are you saying the Court would immediately rule on the issue of interpreting what Delta did and not have to issue an injunction in the face of Delta canceling flights?
So, my opinion isn't based in law? Ok. If you say so, but I'm pretty sure this is the opinion the company would use as the framework for it's case against us. The good stuff begins on page 63. I think it's more pertinent than the case law you posted.
https://crewroom.alpa.org/ual/Deskto...cumentID=44168
I also guess we are going to have to agree to disagree on whether or not Delta would be able to fly their schedule with an increase of long call pilots getting PD's for assigned trips. From what I see, Delta is going to have trouble finding pilots for some flights already - especially for the summer. This is without any more of an increase of reserve pilots getting PD'ed from trips.
Finally, your fall back provision of not caring if Delta is successful in getting an injunction against us is problematic. What do you, mean "…so what?"
As, I said before, we have the high ground. Even though it's taking a while, SD's memo is just as impossible to follow as the company believes our contract is to follow under the new 117 rules. Our pilots will be repaid for the PD's. So, why waste time on a losing cause that has a chance to blow up into something worse?
So, what? So, I want to win. What do you want to do?

I think if DALPA would have come out and said, " Fly the contract, and this is what the contract requires us to do, and this is what we are not required to do", we would have had our heads handed to us by the first court Delta called.
We had to read between the lines, there were signals in the DALPA communications telling us they had our back, but they couldn't come right out and say ANYTHING suggesting that we should do anything other than what we were currently doing. If you are a commuter and want to know what your assignment is immediately so you can plan your commute, like a lot of us, they can't encourage you to stop doing that. If all of a sudden, everyone started acknowledging 3 hours prior, Delta would have been able to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was a job action. They have reams of data on sick calls, and I'm sure they would have reams of data on reserve assignments and verification times pre and post FAR 117 within 3 hours.
The problem isn't with how DALPA handled this situation, they couldn't do anything more than tell us they would help us if a problem came up. The problem, by virtue of DALPA's historically cozy relationship with management, was that we didn't trust them. We didn't believe they would protect us or go to bat for us. Very few guys were willing to take one for the team if it was possible our team already agreed to throw the game. In other words, 1: A lack of unity, and 2: A concern over how behind us our union was going to be, are the issues everyone is arguing over. I think DALPA did all they could with the printed word, however, we have a long way to go if we are going to trust them to have our interests and needs as their first priority.
Thank you to everyone who "leaned into the pitch". Hopefully the next batter doesn't hit into a double play.
And Go Cubbies!E
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 1
From: Capt
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





