Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-2014, 02:46 PM
  #162691  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg View Post
I see what you are saying, but I do disagree.

We have more fleets and that is why management wants to pay band and increase freezes to 5 years if you move between within a band. They stand to gain more than UAL and we will lose many, many jobs. Large stagnation will result.

If pay banding didn't cut UAL training costs in half, why did UAL management want it? I got this number directly from a UAL MEC member. The next day I hear RA wants to cut our training costs in half. How is going to do that without pay banding?

What I see, is the usual suspects saying pay banding is no big deal. Which means we should do it for a bag of jelly beans.

Hopefully like sailing said I just made it up and it will not be in C2015.

Time will tell.

Jerry
The freezes within the bands and half the amount of fleet categories is the causality and the big savings, not the bands themselves, Jerry. Again, you are looking at the after effects and not diagnosing the correct causality.

Were we to allow freezes like that, then it would be a tremendous concession. That would be something to bark about, not the banding itself.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 07-14-2014, 02:48 PM
  #162692  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Frankly, I do not know where the business cycle turns and if I did, I would not be a pilot.
Neither does anyone in our union. We need to keep that in mind for the reps and admins that may try to equate their guesses with fact, and why we might need to get a deal done quickly.

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
We do a better job than most in our contractual engineering. Our Representatives will do the job we task them to achieve.
But will our MEC administrators do their job of listening to our reps? In C2012, the MEC admins did not.

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
If we demand Delta pilots fly these scope busters, we will be in good shape. I am just pointing out the threats on the horizon and ask that we, as pilots, consider the environment we are flying into as we provide direction to our MEC in upcoming negotiations.
Pilots have been demanding this for years. ALPA national has other ideas. So far, ALPA national is winning.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 07-14-2014, 03:02 PM
  #162693  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RonRicco's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Captain
Posts: 822
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
That's incorrect from what I've been told. The early negotiations were based on management wanting MRO cost savings for the old 50 seat RJ's. That is what management wanted and wanted quickly. We ended up giving them more jumbo RJ's with block hour ratio requirements and buying 717's that clearly management would have bought anyway. Our reps didn't know about 70 additional jumbo RJ's going in. That was nowhere in the pilot survey, and a very radioactive topic in my council. But we ended up with 70 additional jumbo RJ's anyway.

Carl
The whole basis of the negotiations was to allow the company to encourage RJ operators to modify their contracts to eliminate 50 seaters, and in return get jumbo RJs as an enticement. Now, whether all the Reps agreed with entering negotiations on that premise is another story, but to say they were unaware is absolutely false.

And you are right (I took the survey as well) it was not in there. On the other hand, every possible scenario can not be included in the survey. That is why we elect Reps and do not have a direct democracy.
RonRicco is offline  
Old 07-14-2014, 03:50 PM
  #162694  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
The freezes within the bands and half the amount of fleet categories is the causality and the big savings, not the bands themselves, Jerry. Again, you are looking at the after effects and not diagnosing the correct causality.

Were we to allow freezes like that, then it would be a tremendous concession. That would be something to bark about, not the banding itself.
I get it now and I agree. To me pay banding is longer freezes, that's where I lost you. I'm hearing RA wants 5 years and he states goals and achieves them. Scary.

Glad we agree longer freezes is a major concession.

Sorry for the slow uptake, I flew 5 legs yesterday.
Jerry
gzsg is offline  
Old 07-14-2014, 04:02 PM
  #162695  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by RonRicco View Post
The whole basis of the negotiations was to allow the company to encourage RJ operators to modify their contracts to eliminate 50 seaters, and in return get jumbo RJs as an enticement. Now, whether all the Reps agreed with entering negotiations on that premise is another story, but to say they were unaware is absolutely false.
They were aware near the end of negotiations, but that guidance was not given by the reps at the beginning. No reps that I know of gave direction to the negotiating committee to pursue allowing management to operate 70 additional 76 seat RJ's.

Originally Posted by RonRicco View Post
And you are right (I took the survey as well) it was not in there. On the other hand, every possible scenario can not be included in the survey. That is why we elect Reps and do not have a direct democracy.
And that's why our structure calls for the MEC administrators to follow MEC direction. That did NOT happen in C2012. The question I have is whether there is anything that can be done to prevent this exact same fait accompli from happening again.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 07-14-2014, 04:14 PM
  #162696  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane View Post
Keep that feeling until you are proven wrong. There are a lot of other employees that transit the pilot lounge on a daily basis. IMO, leaving things in the lounge overnight is asking for trouble. I believe we had this problem a few years ago... I thought they put cameras in the area. Years ago I had a hat disappear....

Denny
I keep trying to get my hat stolen. Lucky you.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 07-14-2014, 04:20 PM
  #162697  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1 View Post
I keep trying to get my hat stolen. Lucky you.
Yeah, 'til you have to shell out a $100 for a new hat and emblem!

I was lucky though, it was an FO hat. I just used my old POS hat until I upgraded. (There was no way I was buying another one!)

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 07-14-2014, 04:45 PM
  #162698  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg View Post
I get it now and I agree. To me pay banding is longer freezes, that's where I lost you. I'm hearing RA wants 5 years and he states goals and achieves them. Scary.

Glad we agree longer freezes is a major concession.

Sorry for the slow uptake, I flew 5 legs yesterday.
Jerry
That's more like it.

Very interesting and something we have to avoid. You on the bus? That sure sounds like a 320 day!
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 07-14-2014, 04:51 PM
  #162699  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,227
Default

Originally Posted by SharpestTool View Post
It would be nice to see the time and money spent on figuring out how to cool that beast on the ground. That and installing an espresso maker in the first class galley.
You could always bring your own espresso maker.
Portable espresso machine, car and travel espresso maker - Handpresso
PilotFrog is offline  
Old 07-14-2014, 05:26 PM
  #162700  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Permanently scarred
Posts: 1,707
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 View Post
I agree. Delta pilots only in our lounges. No DCI pilots, no flight attendants. I always wonder why there are sometimes FA's using the computers in the ATL pilot lounge when their lounge is right across the road. We never go in to the DCI pilot lounges.

And why do they typically park their bag right next to their chair while at the computer?
GunshipGuy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices