Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2015, 06:34 PM
  #176181  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 117
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
What Survey?

Last survey we did was prior to C2012....when fuel was at record highs, and earnings were only about $1Billion per year....

Wonder why we aren't seeing a NEW survey?

Yeah...that's why.
You may be kidding (not sure), but DALPA just completed a pilot survey this past October or November. They even extended the deadline.

T
tsquared030 is offline  
Old 01-18-2015, 11:30 PM
  #176182  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Karnak
Would this be a good time to point out that you have seldom taken positions that match the overwhelming will of our pilot group?

Might also be a good time to point out that Profit Sharing is actually at-risk and variable. to claim otherwise is a noteworthy separation from reality.

Maybe you could focus your Internet energy on discussions of how we can make it less risky and with less downside variance?
All pay is at risk, including bonuses, which is what profit sharing is. It's a bonus that allows us to enjoy some me too pay in good times.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 01-19-2015, 01:19 AM
  #176183  
Gets Weekends Off
 
satchip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Flying the SEC
Posts: 2,350
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer
Ok, but how do you tell which do and which don't?
satchip is offline  
Old 01-19-2015, 01:38 AM
  #176184  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
Laying a little groundwork there Karnak?

I didn't really believe all the talk that DALPA was planning to give back profit sharing.

Until now.
They always slowly show their hand. First they attack and deny. Then the force and sell.

They have been selling this at PUB events and in the crew room for almost a year.

Profit sharing is just another part of our contract. It is not hourly pay rates. As many have said, pay comes in several forms. Per diem, night pay, international over ride, min day, duty rig, trip rig, DC, Defined benefit pension, medical, etc.

Now that we are actually getting profit sharing, management and the insiders want to diminish it.

The proper response is yes we will agree to reduce profit sharing. And in return management will restore trips missed for vacation, 60% final average earnings defined benefit pensions, 75 hour hard cap, eliminate PBS and return to line bidding, zero cost medical, and the 2004 hourly rates plus full accounting for inflation.

Once again managment controls the dialogue and the goal is cost neutral. Once again a handful of insiders are working against us.

American will make over 8 BILLION in 2015. Delta will make well over 5.5 BILLION.

WHY ARE WE GOING TO MAKE CONCESSIONS?

Sick leave concessions.

Pay banding concessions.

Profit sharing reductions.

Do Richard and Ed make concessions?

Can you imagine the Delta board of directors asking Richard and Ed to make concessions in 2015?
gzsg is offline  
Old 01-19-2015, 02:43 AM
  #176185  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
Honest question here...

Forgive me here, but why would any of our pilots specifically want pay banding? This appears to me as a major concession to management.

I ask this with all sincerity as Ive never really heard the pros of pay banding.
All the widebody aircraft would go up to 777 hourly rates.

The 320/MD 88/737 would go up to 757/767 rates.

Which in the short view looks great, but the fact is (as the reps in ATL and SLC pointed out) it reduces staffing and costs jobs.

So? Are we really getting more pay with pay banding?

ALPA is more than capable of calculating the job loss. If the survey shows the pilots desire pay banding with offsetting productivity increases then we will probably agree. Both UAL and AA do this to a larger degree than we do. Their pay bands are listed on this website.
gzsg is offline  
Old 01-19-2015, 03:59 AM
  #176186  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,386
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
They always slowly show their hand. First they attack and deny. Then the force and sell.

They have been selling this at PUB events and in the crew room for almost a year.

Profit sharing is just another part of our contract. It is not hourly pay rates. As many have said, pay comes in several forms. Per diem, night pay, international over ride, min day, duty rig, trip rig, DC, Defined benefit pension, medical, etc.

Now that we are actually getting profit sharing, management and the insiders want to diminish it.

The proper response is yes we will agree to reduce profit sharing. And in return management will restore trips missed for vacation, 60% final average earnings defined benefit pensions, 75 hour hard cap, eliminate PBS and return to line bidding, zero cost medical, and the 2004 hourly rates plus full accounting for inflation.

Once again managment controls the dialogue and the goal is cost neutral. Once again a handful of insiders are working against us.

American will make over 8 BILLION in 2015. Delta will make well over 5.5 BILLION.

WHY ARE WE GOING TO MAKE CONCESSIONS?

Sick leave concessions.

Pay banding concessions.

Profit sharing reductions.

Do Richard and Ed make concessions?

Can you imagine the Delta board of directors asking Richard and Ed to make concessions in 2015?
So Carl and Jerry, why would the Dalpa insiders want to cut their pay and benefits? I keep asking and there is never an answer.
With these insiders having such a Big desire to cut pilot costs how did we go from second to last not that long ago to the top of the industry in total pilot costs in such a short time after Delta' return from the dead?
sailingfun is offline  
Old 01-19-2015, 04:03 AM
  #176187  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,386
Default

[QUOTE=gzsg;1807058]All the widebody aircraft would go up to 777 hourly rates.

The 320/MD 88/737 would go up to 757/767 rates.

Which in the short view looks great, but the fact is (as the reps in ATL and SLC pointed out) it reduces staffing and costs jobs.

So? Are we really getting more pay with pay banding?

ALPA is more than capable of calculating the job loss. If the survey shows the pilots desire pay banding with offsetting productivity increases then we will probably agree. Both UAL and AA do this to a larger degree than we do. Their pay bands are listed on this website.[/QUOTE



Did you not post that pay banding would cost us thousands of jobs just a few months ago?
sailingfun is offline  
Old 01-19-2015, 04:05 AM
  #176188  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
Try again Karnak

Put up, or shut up
Try again The Manager

I'm still waiting on your math for the AAL rates from their MTA.

Put up, or shut up
shiznit is offline  
Old 01-19-2015, 04:27 AM
  #176189  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Default

I love contract negotiation season here on the "latest and greatest"....
DeadHead is offline  
Old 01-19-2015, 04:35 AM
  #176190  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Karnak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 852
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
Every time we enter Section 6, everything is 'at risk', because the company will want to horse trade pay for manning, or pay for benefits, or pay for all of the above....and then there's profit sharing, something they didn't have to worry about when they gave it to us, in bankruptcy.

Now that it looks like it could be a pretty big pay out to us...now...they want to trade that too.

A 'pay raise' in exchange for profit sharing when the company is making BILLIONS isn't a raise at all, unless it's at a greater rate than 1:1. How about 2:1?
The risk to Profit Sharing isn't in section 6, or in bankruptcy! If there are no profits, there is no profit sharing. It's that simple. We've had a good run in the past few years, largely due to our efforts to make this merger work. But we can remember many years when we did our best and there were no profits - and no section 6 or bankruptcy. We can also see other pilots groups with chaotic mergers that are profitable - so maybe there are more factors at work than just great pilots.

What will the profits be in 2017? We can make some reasonable assumptions, just like we make reasonable assumptions about the arrival weather in NRT. But I'm still carrying extra fuel. That's how I think.

I think it would be stupid to get rid of Profit Sharing. I like the "share the gain" concept. But I'd prefer to have most of my total compensation in pay rates that require a section 6 negotiation or a trip to the courthouse to be changed - rather than just a "weak economy" or "bad decisions".
Karnak is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices