Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

tsquare 02-16-2010 05:11 PM


Originally Posted by Superpilot92 (Post 764691)
Once it starts, the faucet make not get turned off again for a while as the retirements start!

I wish I was as optimistic.. on both counts...

keenster 02-16-2010 05:14 PM


Originally Posted by Superpilot92 (Post 764691)
Once it starts, the faucet make not get turned off again for a while as the retirements start!

What retirements are you referring to. Anyone that was considering retiring did so with the Perp and most of them are gone by the end of March. Just check the retirement pictures in DTW. Many over 60 guys really missed the boat in that they have now realized that they are working for free for 2 years beacuse that's how the numbers work with 9 months of full pay added to retirement pay. Oh well, you snooze you loose. If they offer the perp again I bet you will see quite a few takers this time around. So, I do not see the retirements starting as you state above except the occaisional 60 year guy that will go. I am supprized at the number of over 60 guys hanging around. Hopefully you know something that I don't and I am eager to hear some good news about retirements.:(

slowplay 02-16-2010 05:18 PM


Originally Posted by firstmob (Post 764754)
What's the latest on the JAL MD-90's?

SkyTeam had talked about providing "asset backed financing" to JAL. If those assets included MD-90's, why would you go through with the transaction? JAL needs cash right now. There's not a lot of worldwide pent up demand for the Long Beach sewer pipes. Why would you give them cash if they're going to park the aircraft anyway? Even if they continue to operate the MD-90's JAL still loses. It's a small, inefficient fleet that they have to train to and maintain. I say starve them. There are other MD-90's out there and available.

I do hope Delta sees the JAL airplanes someday, but not at the expense of speeding JAL through restructuring. Let JAL park them now, eat the loss and hopefully DAL pick them up later. We'll have enough problems with a healthy JAL and "Open Skies" (sic) in the future.

TANSTAAFL 02-16-2010 05:28 PM


Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 764783)
SkyTeam had talked about providing "asset backed financing" to JAL. If those assets included MD-90's, why would you go through with the transaction? JAL needs cash right now. There's not a lot of worldwide pent up demand for the Long Beach sewer pipes. Why would you give them cash if they're going to park the aircraft anyway? Even if they continue to operate the MD-90's JAL still loses. It's a small, inefficient fleet that they have to train to and maintain. I say starve them. There are other MD-90's out there and available.

I do hope Delta sees the JAL airplanes someday, but not at the expense of speeding JAL through restructuring. Let JAL park them now, eat the loss and hopefully DAL pick them up later. We'll have enough problems with a healthy JAL and "Open Skies" (sic) in the future.

Slow,

Good point JAL had the potential to be an ally - now they are a business enemy to be slain.

johnso29 02-16-2010 05:34 PM


Originally Posted by keenster (Post 764782)
What retirements are you referring to. Anyone that was considering retiring did so with the Perp and most of them are gone by the end of March. Just check the retirement pictures in DTW. Many over 60 guys really missed the boat in that they have now realized that they are working for free for 2 years beacuse that's how the numbers work with 9 months of full pay added to retirement pay. Oh well, you snooze you loose. If they offer the perp again I bet you will see quite a few takers this time around. So, I do not see the retirements starting as you state above except the occaisional 60 year guy that will go. I am supprized at the number of over 60 guys hanging around. Hopefully you know something that I don't and I am eager to hear some good news about retirements.:(


It's questionable whether many of the over 60 guys will make to 63, especially the career long WB guys. I think he's refering to that.

acl65pilot 02-16-2010 05:45 PM


Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 764783)
SkyTeam had talked about providing "asset backed financing" to JAL. If those assets included MD-90's, why would you go through with the transaction? JAL needs cash right now. There's not a lot of worldwide pent up demand for the Long Beach sewer pipes. Why would you give them cash if they're going to park the aircraft anyway? Even if they continue to operate the MD-90's JAL still loses. It's a small, inefficient fleet that they have to train to and maintain. I say starve them. There are other MD-90's out there and available.

I do hope Delta sees the JAL airplanes someday, but not at the expense of speeding JAL through restructuring. Let JAL park them now, eat the loss and hopefully DAL pick them up later. We'll have enough problems with a healthy JAL and "Open Skies" (sic) in the future.

That is true. They have announced that they were dumping them. I cannot recall if they were owned outright or leased. If owned, we would be paying them either way.

acl65pilot 02-16-2010 05:46 PM


Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL (Post 764788)
Slow,

Good point JAL had the potential to be an ally - now they are a business enemy to be slain.

I bet they will regret their decision.

Many of their 744's they are dumping have very high lease rates. As I understand it, that is part of the reason they are dumping em.

acl65pilot 02-16-2010 05:50 PM


Originally Posted by Sink r8 (Post 764775)
You mean like "Blue Schu", or "Schu-me Blu-me"? Certainly has a ring to it.

That is awesome! LAMO.

Superpilot92 02-16-2010 05:54 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 764692)
The feat they are trying to accomplish is to determine where the new staffing level will be in the next down turn. They would prefer to run short in the up turn and then be correctly staffed in the next down turn. A feat to guesstimate that, but something they are trying to do.

The problem with that is when the down turns happen in the future retirements won't slow causing a continuous need for new bodies. The faucet may be tightened but I don't see it getting shutoff completely once the retirements are in full force.

acl65pilot 02-16-2010 05:56 PM

Super;
Part of the forecasting is determining the next downturn. Many think that it will be prior to 2012, FWIW, and because of that they need to sharp shoot the numbers.

There is/are diverging results of the modeling, and until they start pointing in the same direction caution will be taken.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:12 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands