Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2010 | 05:11 PM
  #28941  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92
Once it starts, the faucet make not get turned off again for a while as the retirements start!
I wish I was as optimistic.. on both counts...
Old 02-16-2010 | 05:14 PM
  #28942  
keenster's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: FO forever
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92
Once it starts, the faucet make not get turned off again for a while as the retirements start!
What retirements are you referring to. Anyone that was considering retiring did so with the Perp and most of them are gone by the end of March. Just check the retirement pictures in DTW. Many over 60 guys really missed the boat in that they have now realized that they are working for free for 2 years beacuse that's how the numbers work with 9 months of full pay added to retirement pay. Oh well, you snooze you loose. If they offer the perp again I bet you will see quite a few takers this time around. So, I do not see the retirements starting as you state above except the occaisional 60 year guy that will go. I am supprized at the number of over 60 guys hanging around. Hopefully you know something that I don't and I am eager to hear some good news about retirements.
Old 02-16-2010 | 05:18 PM
  #28943  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by firstmob
What's the latest on the JAL MD-90's?
SkyTeam had talked about providing "asset backed financing" to JAL. If those assets included MD-90's, why would you go through with the transaction? JAL needs cash right now. There's not a lot of worldwide pent up demand for the Long Beach sewer pipes. Why would you give them cash if they're going to park the aircraft anyway? Even if they continue to operate the MD-90's JAL still loses. It's a small, inefficient fleet that they have to train to and maintain. I say starve them. There are other MD-90's out there and available.

I do hope Delta sees the JAL airplanes someday, but not at the expense of speeding JAL through restructuring. Let JAL park them now, eat the loss and hopefully DAL pick them up later. We'll have enough problems with a healthy JAL and "Open Skies" (sic) in the future.
Old 02-16-2010 | 05:28 PM
  #28944  
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Still in one
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
SkyTeam had talked about providing "asset backed financing" to JAL. If those assets included MD-90's, why would you go through with the transaction? JAL needs cash right now. There's not a lot of worldwide pent up demand for the Long Beach sewer pipes. Why would you give them cash if they're going to park the aircraft anyway? Even if they continue to operate the MD-90's JAL still loses. It's a small, inefficient fleet that they have to train to and maintain. I say starve them. There are other MD-90's out there and available.

I do hope Delta sees the JAL airplanes someday, but not at the expense of speeding JAL through restructuring. Let JAL park them now, eat the loss and hopefully DAL pick them up later. We'll have enough problems with a healthy JAL and "Open Skies" (sic) in the future.
Slow,

Good point JAL had the potential to be an ally - now they are a business enemy to be slain.
Old 02-16-2010 | 05:34 PM
  #28945  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by keenster
What retirements are you referring to. Anyone that was considering retiring did so with the Perp and most of them are gone by the end of March. Just check the retirement pictures in DTW. Many over 60 guys really missed the boat in that they have now realized that they are working for free for 2 years beacuse that's how the numbers work with 9 months of full pay added to retirement pay. Oh well, you snooze you loose. If they offer the perp again I bet you will see quite a few takers this time around. So, I do not see the retirements starting as you state above except the occaisional 60 year guy that will go. I am supprized at the number of over 60 guys hanging around. Hopefully you know something that I don't and I am eager to hear some good news about retirements.

It's questionable whether many of the over 60 guys will make to 63, especially the career long WB guys. I think he's refering to that.
Old 02-16-2010 | 05:45 PM
  #28946  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
SkyTeam had talked about providing "asset backed financing" to JAL. If those assets included MD-90's, why would you go through with the transaction? JAL needs cash right now. There's not a lot of worldwide pent up demand for the Long Beach sewer pipes. Why would you give them cash if they're going to park the aircraft anyway? Even if they continue to operate the MD-90's JAL still loses. It's a small, inefficient fleet that they have to train to and maintain. I say starve them. There are other MD-90's out there and available.

I do hope Delta sees the JAL airplanes someday, but not at the expense of speeding JAL through restructuring. Let JAL park them now, eat the loss and hopefully DAL pick them up later. We'll have enough problems with a healthy JAL and "Open Skies" (sic) in the future.
That is true. They have announced that they were dumping them. I cannot recall if they were owned outright or leased. If owned, we would be paying them either way.
Old 02-16-2010 | 05:46 PM
  #28947  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
Slow,

Good point JAL had the potential to be an ally - now they are a business enemy to be slain.
I bet they will regret their decision.

Many of their 744's they are dumping have very high lease rates. As I understand it, that is part of the reason they are dumping em.
Old 02-16-2010 | 05:50 PM
  #28948  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
You mean like "Blue Schu", or "Schu-me Blu-me"? Certainly has a ring to it.
That is awesome! LAMO.
Old 02-16-2010 | 05:54 PM
  #28949  
Superpilot92's Avatar
Underboob King
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Commander
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
The feat they are trying to accomplish is to determine where the new staffing level will be in the next down turn. They would prefer to run short in the up turn and then be correctly staffed in the next down turn. A feat to guesstimate that, but something they are trying to do.
The problem with that is when the down turns happen in the future retirements won't slow causing a continuous need for new bodies. The faucet may be tightened but I don't see it getting shutoff completely once the retirements are in full force.
Old 02-16-2010 | 05:56 PM
  #28950  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Super;
Part of the forecasting is determining the next downturn. Many think that it will be prior to 2012, FWIW, and because of that they need to sharp shoot the numbers.

There is/are diverging results of the modeling, and until they start pointing in the same direction caution will be taken.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices