Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2010 | 02:55 PM
  #29471  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by satchip
I believe these are the opening rounds of the Great War of 2012. After flying with several senior CA who point blank say they will sell scope for pay and retirement and reading this union publication, I see the senior half or third or whatever making a concerted effort to sell 120 seats for shiny new 777/787 and bigger paychecks or retirements. The C44 publication blatantly states that my job is not worth the effort to keep vs the upper half. If that attitude prevails, we will become an anti union. Instead of garnering the most jobs possible the union will sell jobs to enrich its most senior members. The merger has made this even more probable. Remember, more people on the back side of the career curve were added than on the front side.
That's an awfully broad brush you're painting with there Satch. There are many in that group that do not feel the same way.............myself included.

Denny
Old 02-25-2010 | 02:59 PM
  #29472  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by BlueMoon
We estimate that the total fair values, determined as of December 31, 2009, of the aircraft that Chautauqua or Shuttle America could assign to us or require that we purchase if we terminate without cause our contract carrier agreements with those airlines (the “Put Right”) are approximately $200 million and $440 million, respectively.... If the Chautauqua or Shuttle America Put Right is exercised, we must also pay the exercising carrier 10% interest (compounded monthly) on the equity the carrier provided when it purchased the put aircraft. These equity amounts for Chautauqua and Shuttle America total $25 million and $52 million, respectively.
Thanks for anchoring yet another reason why the tail wags the dog.

OK, so who executed this decision and why was this so much better than flying the damn airplanes ourselves?
Old 02-25-2010 | 03:06 PM
  #29473  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
The trick come in with routes that these airlines will refuse to fly. Say ATL-CSG. It may not make money for DAL so it will not make money for SKW. How will DAL for them to fly a route that will not make money for them without guaranteeing them a profit.

Thoughts to ponder.
Put the right equipment on that route. A 3,000nm Mach .84 jet ain't the right bird for the mission. The E120 sucked, but it was enormously profitable.

There is nothing in our scope which would prevent the right equipment be put on that route to make money and provide service that would feed the ATL / CLT or MCO operations of various carriers.

Of course the other issue is the
Heimatschutzministerium and the cost structure that makes it worth the while for Savannah folks to drive to Jacksonville. They blame us for that, but it really is not our fault.
Old 02-25-2010 | 03:09 PM
  #29474  
satchip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 0
From: Flying the SEC
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
That's an awfully broad brush you're painting with there Satch. There are many in that group that do not feel the same way.............myself included.

Denny
Denny, I admit that. But it only takes 50.1% of the votes cast. If elected reps feel bold enough to publish that philosophy in an official document, they must feel they have the support of the majority.

Not meaning to impugn your personal integrity and present company excepted, but every one has a price. Can the company find that point?

Bar, is that entire publication available? I would like to read it before go off even more half cocked.
Old 02-25-2010 | 03:11 PM
  #29475  
Free Bird's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Default Wow

Looks like this RAH order really has this place spun up tonight. Nothing wrong with thinking about and planning the future. Come on guys, the sky isn't falling. I haven't flown with one Capt. that wants to give away SCOPE, in fact it's 100% opposite of that. The LAST thing we need is to divide this pilot group with senior vs. junior stuff. Heck, we just swallowed the whole merger sandwich.

The RJ party is over and mngt. knows it.

Off to enjoy a cold one
Old 02-25-2010 | 03:18 PM
  #29476  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Sat;

I get the feeling from the pilots in charge of the boat that scope is not for sale.

Yes, there are many guys that give two hoots about you. That is your problem. They want to get as much as they can from this job. I do not blame them, they have been screwed. I do not care what they get, as along as it does not come in the form of scope sale.
I could say more but I will not. It is pointless. The point is that, I fly when these guys too, and they are uninformed.

The issue is that we need to realize that these jets can be flown here at mainline. It is not using bargaining capital for jets that are below us, it is making sure there are enough seats on property for those senior guys to stay senior. That is how I frame this argument to them! That is fact.

If we keep whittling away the bottom, before too long the top and the bottom will meet. Those with less than 10 years left just want money. I get that, the problem is that selling scope may very well effect them as well. They just do not see it. Thank god our reps see that. I know for fact the guys in 20, 44 and 66 do!
Old 02-25-2010 | 03:19 PM
  #29477  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Free Bird
Looks like this RAH order really has this place spun up tonight. Nothing wrong with thinking about and planning the future. Come on guys, the sky isn't falling. I haven't flown with one Capt. that wants to give away SCOPE, in fact it's 100% opposite of that. The LAST thing we need is to divide this pilot group with senior vs. junior stuff. Heck, we just swallowed the whole merger sandwich.

The RJ party is over and mngt. knows it.

Off to enjoy a cold one
The RJ party may be over but that does not mean the contracts expire.

BTW I think I know what jet you are on. Those guys are effected by this. The ones I fly with on the ER and those above do not see it EVER effecting them. Not all but many. They want Pay and a pension. (Many not all, some get it, and those are the great trips)
Old 02-25-2010 | 03:20 PM
  #29478  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Super,
Ridding themselves of FFD does not mean stopping third part lift. What it means is making these airlines risk sharing partners in the flying. This will happen with what are now pass through costs as well as the profit.

I guess we could determine that they would be JV's because in effect that is how much of it could be set up. The difference is that they would be flying for the DL code alone. Point is that these airlines will be exposed to the profit/loss side of the equation.

The trick come in with routes that these airlines will refuse to fly. Say ATL-CSG. It may not make money for DAL so it will not make money for SKW. How will DAL for them to fly a route that will not make money for them without guaranteeing them a profit.

Thoughts to ponder.
Delta already did this with ExpressJet Airlines for flying out of LAX. It lasted less then 16 months, and was mutually terminated. It's going to be interesting how the regional picture will turn out when these agreements start to replace the fee for departure agreements.
Old 02-25-2010 | 03:21 PM
  #29479  
satchip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 0
From: Flying the SEC
Default

Originally Posted by Free Bird
Looks like this RAH order really has this place spun up tonight. Nothing wrong with thinking about and planning the future. Come on guys, the sky isn't falling. I haven't flown with one Capt. that wants to give away SCOPE, in fact it's 100% opposite of that. The LAST thing we need is to divide this pilot group with senior vs. junior stuff. Heck, we just swallowed the whole merger sandwich.

The RJ party is over and mngt. knows it.

Off to enjoy a cold one
I have had two separate CAs, one a LCA, tell me point blank that they would sell scope for retirement or big pay raises. The argument was they have only so many years left to make up for the lost DB. They are the ones honest enough to spell it out. There are others. That is why I want to read that ROAR issue.
Old 02-25-2010 | 03:21 PM
  #29480  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by satchip
Instead of garnering the most jobs possible the union will sell jobs to enrich its most senior members. The merger has made this even more probable. Remember, more people on the back side of the career curve were added than on the front side.
December 13th, 2012, can't get here fast enough for many of us. I just worry that they fact they sold our anchor, scuttled the rudder and put the keel of our ship on EBay means we might not be able to save the ship in time.

Not that I advocate mutiny, because I most certainly do not. But, we sure need to figure out a way to get the Captain's attention.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices