![]() |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 944811)
A government body is abusing its power to remove the right to strike in the transportation industry, and they do so entirely at their discretion. Such a law in Congress could not possibly pass. Yet a bureaucracy is doing just that. The response from our national president located in DC...NOTHING.
Add the courts, FAA, NTSB, Congress to your list, and you'll START to see the scope of the problem. But you've made a forum focused effort to blame ALPA for all that's wrong. If the court jacks us in Chapter 11...ALPA screwed it up. If the NTSB overreacts to a pilot mistake...ALPA failed those guys! If ALPA prevents "baseball arbitration" and other efforts to make it harder for us...ALPA is wasting our money on regionals pilots! Thank goodness CAPA has our back! |
Originally Posted by Karnak
(Post 944826)
But you've made a forum focused effort to blame ALPA for all that's wrong. If the court jacks us in Chapter 11...ALPA screwed it up. If the NTSB overreacts to a pilot mistake...ALPA failed those guys! If ALPA prevents "baseball arbitration" and other efforts to make it harder for us...ALPA is wasting our money on regionals pilots!
Thank goodness CAPA has our back! PRIME example - I did a quick search of my email in-box, in the last month I have 4 emails/press releases from ALPA talking about Hand-held lasers and making it a federal crime. I think that's an issue that most of us honestly don't care about. The last email I have from ALPA mentioning Crewpass was TWO MONTHS ago. I think almost ALL pilots would prefer efforts to be made on Crewpass rather than Lasers. |
Originally Posted by Karnak
(Post 944791)
Vodka? Scotch?
ALPA has been getting you pay increases and contract improvements while the vocal APA group has gotten nothing. THAT is "...missing opportunity after opportunity..." Oh..... about those rates we're back to. They're the rates after we took a 32.5% pay cut?! And our current rates are basically just the bankruptcy/emergency rates adjusted for inflation? Well then never mind. My bad. (But we have gotten a few token pay and contract increases while the "vocal" APA has gotten nothing. We got that going for us!) :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 944827)
Carl has a point - ALPA does point to all it's connections in Washington and ability to get stuff done there, but when the rubber meets the road, nothing happens. ALPA does get into the Congressman and Senator's office and speaks their mind, but it's not a strong voice and does a poor job of implementing change that is good for it's members.
All that money Carl has sent to ALPA-PAC, and all those letters he's written to support ALPA's efforts - wasted. Oh, wait.... |
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 944843)
Gosh, I forgot about that! We're already all the way back to our pre-bankruptcy pay rates!!! Moak said it in his last letter as MEC King. Life is good... happy times are here again!!! Party's at my house! :D
Oh..... about those rates we're back to. They're the rates after we took a 32.5% pay cut?! And our current rates are basically just the bankruptcy/emergency rates adjusted for inflation? Well then never mind. My bad. (But we have gotten a few token pay and contract increases while the "vocal" APA has gotten nothing. We got that going for us!) :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 944825)
I agree that a union should be able to strike if they want, BUT, I think that most of America doesn't agree. They think a strike is selfish, arrogant and disrupts the commerce of the country.
Carl |
Originally Posted by Karnak
(Post 944826)
Welcome back, Mr. Van Winkle. You've missed a lot while you were asleep.
Add the courts, FAA, NTSB, Congress to your list, and you'll START to see the scope of the problem. But you've made a forum focused effort to blame ALPA for all that's wrong. If the court jacks us in Chapter 11...ALPA screwed it up. If the NTSB overreacts to a pilot mistake...ALPA failed those guys! If ALPA prevents "baseball arbitration" and other efforts to make it harder for us...ALPA is wasting our money on regionals pilots! Thank goodness CAPA has our back! Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 944860)
Not a single word of what you've posted describes what I believe. Not that it matters to you.
Keep up the hidden work on behalf of all Delta pilots, and the (get it right this time!), entire profession. |
Originally Posted by Karnak
(Post 944848)
Call President Bates at APA. Tell him how bad it's been for you.
|
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 944827)
Carl has a point - ALPA does point to all it's connections in Washington and ability to get stuff done there, but when the rubber meets the road, nothing happens. ALPA does get into the Congressman and Senator's office and speaks their mind, but it's not a strong voice and does a poor job of implementing change that is good for it's members.
PRIME example - I did a quick search of my email in-box, in the last month I have 4 emails/press releases from ALPA talking about Hand-held lasers and making it a federal crime. I think that's an issue that most of us honestly don't care about. The last email I have from ALPA mentioning Crewpass was TWO MONTHS ago. I think almost ALL pilots would prefer efforts to be made on Crewpass rather than Lasers. Or maybe just respond to the many "Call to Action" requests made and take a couple of minutes of your time to right your Congressman and Senators. Important legislation is pending. Call to Action: Support One Level of Safety – Oppose the Inhofe FT/DT Carve Out Amendment February 7, 2011 - An amendment to the FAA bill is pending on the Senate floor right now. This amendment, sponsored by Senators James Inhofe (R-OK) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), would exempt some all-cargo and charter air carriers from the pending flight and duty time rules. ALPA has been pushing for updated, science-based fatigue rules for decades. With a final rule within sight, pilots are urged to contact their U.S. Senators to enlist their support to defeat the Inhofe amendment which would allow subpart-S carriers operate under a separate set of fatigue rules. The Aviation Safety and Federal Aviation Administration Act (P.L. 111-216), which was signed into law last summer, mandates that the FAA issue a final rule updating pilot flight and duty time regulations. ALPA has long called for updated fatigue rules based on science that provide one level of safety. ALPA participated in the Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) that was tasked with making recommendations to the FAA on pilot fatigue. Unfortunately, Senator Inhofe is attempting to derail the work of the ARC and the FAA and allow non-scheduled air carriers to operate under a different set of rules. This is simply unacceptable. ALPA President Lee Moak sent a letter to the U.S. Senate last week, denouncing this proposal. Now it’s time for ALPA members to get involved with our nationwide Call to Action. Time is short. Please contact your Senators today and urge them to vote “No” on the Inhofe amendment to the FAA Reauthorization bill. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:41 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands