Not sure I agree....

You disagree because you're out of ideas on this topic. I don't really see the value of a longevity-based system, for several philosophical reasons, but I wasn't particularly looking to argue about it. You take it upon yourself to bring up the "illustrative" example of parking the 744's in support of your preferred pay method, and in the process you highlight a crucial flaw in the system. You bring forth an argument in a public forum, but you don't want to debate it?

I know testosterone levels drop as we age, but this is a little excesssive. Your last post fits somewhere between "ex-wife" and "B Coordinator". Shirley, you can do better?

Don't argue for me, and mind your business!:)

Oh yeah, I forgot, got to remember that on a public forum! :rolleyes:

Things are heating up early today! Hope this helps....


http://cdn.wwtdd.com/wp-content/uplo...3-760x1197.jpg

You don't think that, if you remove the financial incentives to fly a larger airplane, people would pick flying closer to home, or flying that's less tiring, etc.? I think our category lists are very much influenced by money. It's not the sole incentive, but it's a major incentive. Some individuals go against this trend, but in the aggregate, there it is: the higher paying categories are senior. You can validate this by looking at airlines such as British Airways where (I believe) there is no financial incentive to fly larger airplanes, and the senior guys are flying shorter NB trips.

Very soothing. Thank you.

IOW, much better to have a crappy QOL your entire career.. got it.

Really ACL? And my point is strictly one sided. Good grief, I think it is time for me to cuss somebody out and get banished from this board.

Yeah, you're an ***wipe.. is that better?