|
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 1027613)
Yeah Scoop, our trips are horrid. When you have the top five guys flying red eyes to Orlando, you know we're toast. When red eyes are the BEST you can hope for.....we have the AK code share to attribute that to. Our trips suck. I'm thinking about the ER as well. If I have to do reserve, might as well make a few more bucks for it. Take the survey and let them know!
Done. :) Scoop |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1027233)
Yep!
And for those who haven't seen: 1) Reaction of certain individuals after not being elected to the Negotiating Committee in March 2010... 2) 3) 4) |
Bored with union talk? Me too.
Breaking news: http://mitchieville.com/wp-content/u...mila-kunis.jpg Mila Kunis Protective Of Her Bum: "Friends With Benefits" Beauty Hires Butt Double There's no doubt that "Friends With Benefits" star, Mila Kunis should be more than comfortable showing off her bangin' bod, but according to the actress, she didn't want to give everything away in her new clothes optional flick. Kunis confessed her butt double decision on Ryan Seacrest's radio show but did admit that, although she may not be showing off her derriere, that doesn't mean she's won't be giving an above the belt peep show. "I showed side boob and I figured I can't just give away everything all at once ... I gotta let it all out in little pieces here and there," Kunis told Seacrest. We can understand that. But just because Kunis wasn't baring her own bum doesn't mean she didn't have a hand in choosing her butt double. Kunis, the flick's director and her makeup artist held a casting call in which one after another, bum double hopefuls mooned Mila and her esteemed panel before they made the decision as to which derriere would do the trick. |
Originally Posted by Boomer
(Post 1027598)
The longer I look at this picture, the more I'm convinced there is no fabric in her suit.
Studying pictures like that with such intensity could cause your vision to become impaired. :D |
Originally Posted by Enemyofthestate
(Post 1027747)
Name that caption..... :D
1) Reaction of certain individuals after not being elected to the Negotiating Committee in March 2010... 2) 3) 4) |
Originally Posted by enemyofthestate
(Post 1027747)
name that caption..... :d
1) reaction of certain individuals after not being elected to the negotiating committee in march 2010... 2) 3) 4) |
Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
(Post 1027758)
2) Reaction of 2009 hire upon learning they can no longer hold 7ERB due to fleet realignment :eek:
Wait, did we hire anyone in 2009? |
You'd think by 1pm they could get the short calls published?
|
Originally Posted by Enemyofthestate
(Post 1027747)
Name that caption..... :D
1) Reaction of certain individuals after not being elected to the Negotiating Committee in March 2010... 2) 3) 4) |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1027526)
It's tough debating someone who doesn't understand legal action. USAPA's counsel (Lee Seham) is claiming this to be true IN THE CASE OF USAPA. He is not saying that it is always negotiable under all circumstances. I know it's what you need to keep claiming, but it's not his claim.
Carl Why would Caplinger hire such a man? How much is he being paid, what promises of future payment has Caplinger made? Why not post the contract between DPA and the USAPA/DPA working to overturn an arbitrated list law firm? How much money does DPA have left? Can they afford to pay Seham, or are they promising him future payments from Delta pilot dues money? If DPA is really transparent, answer those questions. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:48 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands