|
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 1027558)
:D
It looks like you are more than holding your own without me. :D Those individual responses to each sentence / premise are devastating. And this is coming from someone who is still willing to take responsibility for ALPA's actions. The opener will tell me all I need to know. BTW, it's good to be back. :D Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spakler
(Post 1027568)
A lawyer who tells his client what he wants to hear, then proceeds to rack up infinite numbers of billable hours in pursuit of a goal he knows is virtually impossible is not doing his client justice...he's padding his wallet.
Originally Posted by Carl Spakler
(Post 1027568)
Meanwhile "success" at not implementing the seniority list has come at such great expense. The Captains at Airways make the same as most Delta FO's. A Pyrrhic victory at best.
Originally Posted by Carl Spakler
(Post 1027568)
Interesting that you think blocking a list at all monetary and ethical costs is a "success". You haven't changed.
Speaking of ethics, did you apply for flight pay loss when you helped to disrupt the DPA during the ATL visit? Or did you just charge for the production of that video? Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spakler
(Post 1027570)
I've heard second-hand that DPA was starting to spread yet another untruth. I knew if there was a fib to be told I could count on Carl. Now I've heard it first hand!
Originally Posted by Carl Spakler
(Post 1027570)
This is factually incorrect and it's intended to deceive Delta pilots into thinking that DPA is financially viable to commence Section 6. They aren't and they can't possibly be. Early openers are just 6 or 7 months away.
Originally Posted by Carl Spakler
(Post 1027570)
If you ever tried to untangle that money and distribute it, you would have to go "first-in, first-out" so you'd have to find retired pilots and refund them their surplus before you could give it to anyone else.
Originally Posted by Carl Spakler
(Post 1027570)
Do some quick math and figure out what the DPA promise of 1% does in half a year.
Originally Posted by Carl Spakler
(Post 1027570)
Which is probably why the pan-handling has escalated in recent emails. I saw one where he asked people to donate a whole rotation's worth of pay. ROFL
That's more than we pay to ALPA in a whole year. Carl |
Originally Posted by Boomer
(Post 1027598)
The longer I look at this picture, the more I'm convinced there is no fabric in her suit.
http://www.celebgossipz.com/wp-conte...e-Upton-61.jpg The longer I look at it, the more I don't like being shown yet another example of destinations I'll never get to visit. :( Carl |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1027600)
You're in good company, I think we're all growing tired of Cohen, Weiss, and Simon.
I'm hearing from folks that they're telling the MEC we cannot pursue RAH holdings because our Section 1 is weak. Is that true? Oh wait... Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1027651)
Seham is not telling his client what he wants to hear, he's following orders from the client. Again, I think USAPA is grasping at straws, but you have to admire a law firm that fights for their client to the bitter end.
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1027601)
I
But now that you point this out I wonder how many pilots will be applying tonight to be a Body Paint and Make-up artist? :D |
|
Originally Posted by 1215fuzz
(Post 1027625)
Question: Can you have "Underboob" with a painted on suit? |
Originally Posted by PilotFrog
(Post 1027495)
So with the slot swap I saw Delta and USAir were to sell 16 and 8 slots respectively. Who sells them? Does USAir get the money from the slots at LGA or does Delta? If they have to sell them do they go by auction or do the companies get to sell them to whom they want? What is to stop Delta from selling them to USAir and vice-versa?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:46 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands