![]() |
Originally Posted by Eck4Life
(Post 978652)
Question for the PMNW hires in the '07-'08 timeframe. I've been carrying a -15 bank apparently that is just now being repaid out of my paychecks. I didn't notice it before as I was a reserve guy until recently and never broke min guarantee. Payroll says it was carried over from before the payroll dept switchover in Jan 2010. No one down in ATL knows what it's about, but I know I haven't messed with my bank. I would hardly even know how to. Is this a NWism that I've forgotten about? Something comes to mind about 15 hrs of pay as a new hire, but there was a lot going on then. Thanks for any light you can shed on this. PM me if you like.
|
Originally Posted by Eck4Life
(Post 978652)
Question for the PMNW hires in the '07-'08 timeframe. I've been carrying a -15 bank apparently that is just now being repaid out of my paychecks. I didn't notice it before as I was a reserve guy until recently and never broke min guarantee. Payroll says it was carried over from before the payroll dept switchover in Jan 2010. No one down in ATL knows what it's about, but I know I haven't messed with my bank. I would hardly even know how to. Is this a NWism that I've forgotten about? Something comes to mind about 15 hrs of pay as a new hire, but there was a lot going on then. Thanks for any light you can shed on this. PM me if you like.
|
Originally Posted by Columbia
(Post 978645)
Air France to serve San Francisco with A380
Air France to serve San Francisco with A380 - Business Traveller The French flag carrier will join Lufthansa as the second airline to operate A380 flights to San Francisco, with a daily service over the summer period. The carrier will offer daily A380 flights between Paris CDG and the Californian city from June 6 until September 4, departing Paris at 1030 and arriving at 1240. The return leg leaves San Francisco at 1610, landing back into the French capital at 1135 the next day. Business Traveller understands Air France may make this new superjumbo service possible by redeploying its A380 aircraft operating on the Paris CDG-Tokyo route, as a result of the fall in demand for flights to Japan following the country’s earthquake and tsunami. Lufthansa is set to become the first carrier to fly the A380 to San Francisco next month, with a daily service (replacing the current B747-400 on the route) starting on May 10 – see online news January 27 for more information.
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 978663)
That's actually an example of the JV working, without hurting us, for a change. We're not dropping a route for this to happen, we don't really have a competitive product to offer against LH's A380 anyway... so why not? Maybe it keeps people going for Skyteam miles, and maybe those people need to go to Japan using our flights at some other time.
No matter what, I plan on hearing from DALPA soon on how that affects the Protocol Agreement WRT the JV and how Delta Pilots are going to be protected with these shifts. Boy oh boy, the Scope Compliance Committee certainly has lots of things to investigate lately!! |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 978663)
That's actually an example of the JV working, without hurting us, for a change. We're not dropping a route for this to happen, we don't really have a competitive product to offer against LH's A380 anyway... so why not? Maybe it keeps people going for Skyteam miles, and maybe those people need to go to Japan using our flights at some other time.
If we can no longer justify an ER out of SLC, then what? |
VX A320 flying formation with Virgin Galactic White Knight 2 (including formation landing at SFO. Pretty cool....
Google Translate |
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 978682)
Sink. A little premature on the analysis. Do we JV with them out of SLC? That is the key to answer, cause if we don't, there went a lot of CDG-SLC and connecting on to the Bay Area/Nor Cal market.
If we can no longer justify an ER out of SLC, then what? |
Bank
Originally Posted by Eck4Life
(Post 978652)
Question for the PMNW hires in the '07-'08 timeframe. I've been carrying a -15 bank apparently that is just now being repaid out of my paychecks. I didn't notice it before as I was a reserve guy until recently and never broke min guarantee. Payroll says it was carried over from before the payroll dept switchover in Jan 2010. No one down in ATL knows what it's about, but I know I haven't messed with my bank. I would hardly even know how to. Is this a NWism that I've forgotten about? Something comes to mind about 15 hrs of pay as a new hire, but there was a lot going on then. Thanks for any light you can shed on this. PM me if you like.
|
Originally Posted by ExAF
(Post 978688)
It is not just limited to the "new hires." Unless you overflew 80 hrs a month a lot or actively worked towards paying off your bank, many had a -15 bank when we changed over. The info about Delta grabbing the "over 80" for bank payback is correct.
|
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 978686)
Per the JV protocols that all the companies and the unions signed, an equivalent number of available "seat miles"(or seat kilometers for the European types) will have to be transferred to DAL metal for us to fly across the Atlantic.
Not directed at you, but in general: It is a North Atlantic JV, not a Europe to the Eastern United States, so yes, this change effects it. I beleive it is being flown on the 777-300 right now. (At least that is what I saw last month sitting at the gate) |
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 978682)
Sink. A little premature on the analysis. Do we JV with them out of SLC? That is the key to answer, cause if we don't, there went a lot of CDG-SLC and connecting on to the Bay Area/Nor Cal market.
If we can no longer justify an ER out of SLC, then what? Since I don't think we were anywhere close to launching a direct to AMS or CDG from SFO with lie-flats, and amenities equivalent to the 380, then this is a move that's exploring JV revenue on a city pair we're not toying with all that much. I didn't say this is anything to do backflips over, but it is an example of the JV working as intended. If we're distributing flying on the basis of ASM's, then I would imagine one A380 SFO-CDG needs at least two 7ER's from the East Coast to offset. And if this dings the SLC-CDG flight, which I don't really see (there are plenty of better options from SFO on Star), then we need further offset. I can certainly review my analysis if warranted. At a glance, I'm not worried about this one. I'm more concerned we'll not see AMM or CAI back from JFK, for example. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:11 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands