Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Nice while it lasted
Just saw a clip on Fox News. Looks to me like a fire in the right main landing gear area and I could see passengers sliding down the tailcone slide. One report I saw indicated a blown tire on landing. I'm guessing a brake fire.
I blew a tire on landing in the 88 once. The degradation to braking effectiveness with one blown tire was very eye opening. Had to go back into heavy reverse thrust to get the aircraft stopped within the runway. And the braking effort with only one tire on that side resulted in substantial damage to the remaining tire. I could see this scenario easily resulting in a brake fire.
I blew a tire on landing in the 88 once. The degradation to braking effectiveness with one blown tire was very eye opening. Had to go back into heavy reverse thrust to get the aircraft stopped within the runway. And the braking effort with only one tire on that side resulted in substantial damage to the remaining tire. I could see this scenario easily resulting in a brake fire.
What is the "negative effect?" With the 76 seat scope grievance there could have been a negative effect to losing but I don't see how we have that situation here.
File the grievance and challenge that RAH is operating as a single carrier then mediate it and request clarification from the NMB on RAHs status.
If we lose the grievance we still have a big fight on scope in section 6 and it's becoming more and more apparent that it's a fight that DALPA is not going to fight at any time nor should we expect much in the way of a raise.
(Off topic rant
)
How many articles has Delta Air Lines put out preparing pilots for lower expectations? How may has DALPA put out?
Council 44 stated publicly that they would inform their pilots when a decision had been made about the RAH issue. We still haven't heard a thing even though it now sounds like the MEC has made this another "dead issue" and the pilots are to be left in the dark about it.

File the grievance and challenge that RAH is operating as a single carrier then mediate it and request clarification from the NMB on RAHs status.
If we lose the grievance we still have a big fight on scope in section 6 and it's becoming more and more apparent that it's a fight that DALPA is not going to fight at any time nor should we expect much in the way of a raise.
(Off topic rant
)How many articles has Delta Air Lines put out preparing pilots for lower expectations? How may has DALPA put out?
Council 44 stated publicly that they would inform their pilots when a decision had been made about the RAH issue. We still haven't heard a thing even though it now sounds like the MEC has made this another "dead issue" and the pilots are to be left in the dark about it.

Also, from what I gathered, no "decision" has been made. Resolutions were passed and they need to wait for answers for some of those resolutions. I briefly talked to a rep about this, but it was among other subjects.
Seriously, call them, I plan to later this week.
The legal answer is that it DOES violate our Section 1 but we have not enforced it in the past with AA Eagle at LAX and the lawyers claim that "past practices" will doom us in the System Board. They might be right. But now we'll never know.
Management's argument:
How to Win Past Practice Grievances, Chapter One
Management's argument:
How to Win Past Practice Grievances, Chapter One
That may be it, I do not know. RJET is totally different than AMR Eagle, as it is a code share agreement, and Mesa, was a different animal completely. I know that there are some issues with the definition of "Air Carrier" and the intent of what an air carrier is, and it never being a holding company and only a certificate holder. I think it has less to do with precedence than the issue of the definition. Saying that RJET is acting like an air carrier is true, but until we get DOT backing that a holding company is an "air carrier" as well as a holding company, the legal answer may leave us dead in the water.
I do not agree with it, but then again, I am not a lawyer and they are the ones that tell us what latitude the definition, as currently defined, can give us. I am sure a independent lawyer would tell you the same thing if he/she was not trying to just steal your money.

From what I gather it is not for a lack of desire, and the decision will be one that the reps make, not one they are told to make. If you have been to a MEC meeting with the "ALPA" lawyers present, you would quickly realize that they present legal opinions based on all information available to them. They then ask the Reps how they want to proceed. It is not underhanded or scheming in any level. It actually is downright boring and take the wind out of many arguments very quickly. These lawyers have been doing labor law for a very long time. They want to see us win, trust me.
It was obviously a torque problem in the flux capacitor.
Clearly pilot error. Why else would the clutch be damaged?
Inventory survival kit ..
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
From: Seeking no jacket required rotations
TV news is good for video only, preferably with the sound muted...
Delta plane catches fire at Hartsfield
By Kristi E. Swartz
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
A Delta Air Lines flight coming from Pittsburgh caught fire as it landed on the runway at Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport late Saturday afternoon.
Four passengers sought first aid for minor injuries, but no one was hospitalized, according to Atlanta Fire Capt. Jolyon Bundridge.
The flight had 44 passengers and five crew members, according to information from Delta.
The brakes on the plane -- #2284 -- overheated on the taxiway, which caused the fire, Delta said, using information from their operations control center.
FAA officials reported that the plane blew a tire while landing.
The plane has been taken out of service and will be examined at a maintenance facility to determine exactly what happened, a Delta spokeswoman said.
Smoke and flames could be seen coming from the plane while it was on the runway.
Passengers were evacuated using emergency slides or stairs from multiple exits and then taken by bus to the terminal, Delta said.
Delta officials haven't determined whether Saturday's incident will impact any of its other flights.
Delta plane catches fire at Hartsfield
By Kristi E. Swartz
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
A Delta Air Lines flight coming from Pittsburgh caught fire as it landed on the runway at Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport late Saturday afternoon.
Four passengers sought first aid for minor injuries, but no one was hospitalized, according to Atlanta Fire Capt. Jolyon Bundridge.
The flight had 44 passengers and five crew members, according to information from Delta.
The brakes on the plane -- #2284 -- overheated on the taxiway, which caused the fire, Delta said, using information from their operations control center.
FAA officials reported that the plane blew a tire while landing.
The plane has been taken out of service and will be examined at a maintenance facility to determine exactly what happened, a Delta spokeswoman said.
Smoke and flames could be seen coming from the plane while it was on the runway.
Passengers were evacuated using emergency slides or stairs from multiple exits and then taken by bus to the terminal, Delta said.
Delta officials haven't determined whether Saturday's incident will impact any of its other flights.
File this under the "how are the loads this holiday weekend?" file: just came off a three day, 7 leg domestic trip. Mostly coast-to-coast stuff at all hours of the day and night. Not a single seat available on any leg. Two were oversold in a big way. If we're not making money, we're doing something wrong.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





