Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Subscribe
6395  6895  7295  7345  7385  7391  7392  7393  7394  7395  7396  7397  7398  7399  7405  7445  7495  7895  8395 
Page 7395 of 20173
Go to
Quote: Bloomberg reporting Delta order 100 737-900s
Would make sense to split it. Plus AS already flies the 900 so we can get all of our manuals from them once we buy em

I keed I keed.
Quote: Bloomberg reporting Delta order 100 737-900s
Hmmmmm interesting. 737-900"ER" has a range (per BA website) of 3265NM. The 737-800 has a range of 3115NM.. ER??? Really? But it would carry 18 more people those additional 150 miles so we would have THAT going for us...
Quote: Would make sense to split it. Plus AS already flies the 900 so we can get all of our manuals from them once we buy em

I keed I keed.
I'm still hoping it was a planed leak to get the price down on some new airbus Neos, and that we will never see any 737-900s.
Quote: Advantages of the 737-900.
  • Saves the "redundant" brakes and tires the 757 uses to get stopped
  • Easy to perform V1 cuts with a rotation speed near cruise speed
  • Never exceeds 4 degrees nose up, or 2 degrees nose down, for the pitch adverse
  • Engines could be managed with a single pole switch, full power & off
  • Too much airplane on too little wing makes for a comfortable transition for Douglas drivers
  • RJ like cabin accommodations make our product more "seamless"
  • Airspace is less crowded in the low to mid 20's, where this airplane reaches it apogee. There are fewer turbocharged Cessna aircraft to get in the way (their new product line all outperfoms this jet)
  • Less opportunity for confusion on the ground. This airplane only has to find its way to the "longest available."
FTB, we can hope some fall out of the upcoming debacle at SWA results in the 717's getting shaken loose.
Awesome! I was getting worried about going to a new category, now I'll feel a little bit more comfortable in a transition.

That is some funny stuff Bar.
The MD90 engines have more thrust than the engines on the 737-900ER - that should tell you something right there.

My wife used to be an ops agent for Alaska Airlines. She was responsible for load planning and weight and balance - she hated the 900. The CG envelope was so narrow at max weights, moving one bag from the front pit to the back pit could move the CG from outside the forward limit to outside the aft limit. Great

That was with the original 900 though, hopefully the ER version is better.
Quote: I flew the 737-900 at CAL. I'll take my old Douglas DC-9-88 with an APU and the left pack on the hook over that jet. Yuck!
^^^^ And there ya go. ^^^^

I've never heard anyone happy with that jet.

Unless they order a 2L door and make it 2x3 seating. So really its a MD88 replacement. Then maybe... but they won't.
I find it hard to believe we'd order 100 737-900s right now.

Its not a good long-term plan, and that's a lot of money tied up in replacing an existing capability. Even worse would be a committal to buy the 737-9 with the LEAP-X engines.
It's possible DAL is using the 787 penalty to get these jets for a song, right at a time when Boeing need orders for its cash cow that's about to run dry...

Airbus vs Boeing is as childish as Ford vs Chevy does it really make a difference?
Now if we're talking MB vs BMW, now you're talking

Cheers
George
Quote: I guess I am a little pessimistic also, given DALPA's track record. All the company has to do is ask. I'm sure you don't understand the majority of our Pilot's pessimism based on your continued drum beating for Dalpa.
Really?

Why hasn't the company asked already if it's that easy?

It would be so easy to pay DAL pilots less than any other legacy or LCC if that was the case!

You mean the company that asked DALPA to staff jets with 2CA's and 2 FO's on 12+ hr flights instead of the 1CA and 3FO's like NW had?

There's plenty more but I'll just pretend like you were kidding.
Quote: I find it hard to believe we'd order 100 737-900s right now.

Its not a good long-term plan, and that's a lot of money tied up in replacing an existing capability. Even worse would be a committal to buy the 737-9 with the LEAP-X engines.
It's possible DAL is using the 787 penalty to get these jets for a song, right at a time when Boeing need orders for its cash cow that's about to run dry...

Airbus vs Boeing is as childish as Ford vs Chevy does it really make a difference?
Now if we're talking MB vs BMW, now you're talking

Cheers
George
Frankly, I would be surprised if we announced right now. I figured we would wait until after the late summer holiday weekend......
Quote: I find it hard to believe we'd order 100 737-900s right now.

Its not a good long-term plan, and that's a lot of money tied up in replacing an existing capability. Even worse would be a committal to buy the 737-9 with the LEAP-X engines.
It's possible DAL is using the 787 penalty to get these jets for a song, right at a time when Boeing need orders for its cash cow that's about to run dry...

Airbus vs Boeing is as childish as Ford vs Chevy does it really make a difference?
Now if we're talking MB vs BMW, now you're talking

Cheers
George
It could be a planned leak to "urge" the Airbus folks to get a better offer. None of the Bloomberg article is fact, it is just speculation......

It might not be as bad with a 757 nose/cockpit assembly on the front....anything to try and get that cockpit quieter!
6395  6895  7295  7345  7385  7391  7392  7393  7394  7395  7396  7397  7398  7399  7405  7445  7495  7895  8395 
Page 7395 of 20173
Go to