Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
#8031
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Nor have I. I know a few places there are DAL crew in van only contracts but most guys do not care.
![acl65pilot is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
#8032
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Either I live a sheltered life, or you sir, love to make stuff up.
![KC10 FATboy is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#8033
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Confused](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/confused.gif)
![tsquare is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#8034
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well I always look to history to see what has happned in similar situations. When Continental voted in ALPA and booted the IACP it only took a year and XJT was sold, the flow cancelled, and any future furloughed CAL mainline guys were on the street. The company wanted that and ALPA National did nothing to stop it nor did the new CALALPA guys who were doing whatever their new leadership guys in VA were telling them to do. In the end, mainline pilots lost their jobs. I highly doubt we will have any support from ALPA National on a flow issue and it appears DALPA also has this issue on the bottom of their priority list. In a year CPS will be sold, we will have Delta guys in the unemployment line, and DCI carriers will be hiring to staff 76-seat jets weighing 90,000 pounds.
Last edited by RockyBoy; 06-08-2009 at 08:22 PM.
![RockyBoy is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#8035
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 841
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What's the word on the on going Delta and Boeing talks ref 787 compensation/777LR orders?
![firstmob is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#8036
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Can any F-NWA guys on here (was at the bar in LGA with a bunch of NWA guys last week... they rather liked the "NERD" thing) find the wording of the CPZ LOA and the penalties involved when they are sold?
I know its someplace in the archives of Flightinfo... I'll see if I can rummage up anything.
I know its someplace in the archives of Flightinfo... I'll see if I can rummage up anything.
![80ktsClamp is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#8037
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 320B
Posts: 781
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Max # of large RJ's reduced to 55
"In the event that (i) the requirements of Section 1 B.7.c.(7)(d)7' are not met, or (ii) the rights to pilot positions or flow rights set forth in Section 1 B.7.c.(7)(d)2' together with Letter of Agreement 2006-10 as they may apply to the Feeder Carrier Affiliate or Feeder Carrier Successor, are modified or terminated for any reason, other than through a written agreement between the Company and Association as representative of the Company’s pilots, the maximum number of 51–76 seat aircraft permitted by Section 1 B.7.c.(7)(a) shall be reduced to the lower cap (i.e. 55)"
"In the event that (i) the requirements of Section 1 B.7.c.(7)(d)7' are not met, or (ii) the rights to pilot positions or flow rights set forth in Section 1 B.7.c.(7)(d)2' together with Letter of Agreement 2006-10 as they may apply to the Feeder Carrier Affiliate or Feeder Carrier Successor, are modified or terminated for any reason, other than through a written agreement between the Company and Association as representative of the Company’s pilots, the maximum number of 51–76 seat aircraft permitted by Section 1 B.7.c.(7)(a) shall be reduced to the lower cap (i.e. 55)"
![1234 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#8038
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Max # of large RJ's reduced to 55
"In the event that (i) the requirements of Section 1 B.7.c.(7)(d)7' are not met, or (ii) the rights to pilot positions or flow rights set forth in Section 1 B.7.c.(7)(d)2' together with Letter of Agreement 2006-10 as they may apply to the Feeder Carrier Affiliate or Feeder Carrier Successor, are modified or terminated for any reason, other than through a written agreement between the Company and Association as representative of the Company’s pilots, the maximum number of 51–76 seat aircraft permitted by Section 1 B.7.c.(7)(a) shall be reduced to the lower cap (i.e. 55)"
"In the event that (i) the requirements of Section 1 B.7.c.(7)(d)7' are not met, or (ii) the rights to pilot positions or flow rights set forth in Section 1 B.7.c.(7)(d)2' together with Letter of Agreement 2006-10 as they may apply to the Feeder Carrier Affiliate or Feeder Carrier Successor, are modified or terminated for any reason, other than through a written agreement between the Company and Association as representative of the Company’s pilots, the maximum number of 51–76 seat aircraft permitted by Section 1 B.7.c.(7)(a) shall be reduced to the lower cap (i.e. 55)"
![Superpilot92 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#8039
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 320B
Posts: 781
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, "never" is a long time and I have grown to be quite cynical in my relatively short duration around here.
![1234 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post