![]() |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1114415)
buzz- just to back UAL up... I would have had to delete the political posts as well. It strayed off the allowable path for this forum.
Hey 80, Can you give me my permissions back? You took them away months ago cuz you didn't like my fat lady Avatar. Can't even PM to ask for permissions.... |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1114496)
Tebow threw for 3:16 against the Steelers. 3:16.
True dat. Not made up. |
Alright alright.
For the most part, most of who posts here are men? Right? We, men, have something in common in that we have a "drive" that maxes out at 18 and then declines steadily until death. http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...d/temp8-13.png So, there is an audience for "pictures" of underknee and stuff. Believe it or not, there are entire websites dedicated to it. So let's be honest, some of the pictures are border line porn, plain and simple. As in, if all you need is another inch to reveal everything, then it's porn. I think it's fair in this setting that some pictures get erased. I don't like infractions, I get them as well for other stuff, I get it. As to the mooning picture. I have to say, all that was...was... a Pittsburgh Steelers fan with their shorts at half mast. or half staff. Either way, if we're talking about a dude with his pants down, lets not use the word mast or staff. Agree? Mooning is about a statement, not a butt. And if ever I get to moon 80, I do. :D As to political speak, it's hard not to bring it in to the discussion sometimes in the sense that what the POTUS or SCOTUS or Congress or DOT does directly effects/affects us as a pilot group. It is absolutely relevant, however, sometimes venting causes retaliation and it flat out snowballs. I'm not a mod, don't want to be one, and I won't speak of anyone else but I will say that I will regulate how I handle political discussions to being pertinent to us with the aim that if I vent it's done in such a way to negate the snowball effect. |
Originally Posted by captainv
(Post 1114500)
So, to sum up, Mods, completely naked guy buttcheeks are okay but still-clothed underboob went over the line.
Oy. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1114495)
On my way to finding more underknee I found this peculiar ad...
http://travelwithcj.com/wp-content/u...-attendant.jpg |
|
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1114519)
My Mother!!!! Can't I think of her as my Aunt with a loose (not lose) sense of morality?
:D |
But to be sure, TV personalities are fair game. True.?
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1114518)
Ummmmmm.............WHAT?! :eek:
No more FTB infractions. It might turn FTB from http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-MJi3ECwWgS...egger+pic1.jpg to http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...mnGHVA9T-7exBE |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1114518)
Ummmmmm.............WHAT?! :eek:
Oh, and if the standard is network TV, that's fine too. (google Charlotte Ross NYPD Blue) But basically, just make up your dang mind and stick with it, or this can turn into a school board meeting where you start talking about acceptable percentages of body parts or try to define "dorsal nudity." Or was it just a case of a mod not used to our forum - kind of like getting a line check from "one of those" check airmen? http://www.motifake.com/image/demoti...1251402524.jpg |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands