Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
05-15-2012, 02:58 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
My sincere hope is that if these are the numbers that the MEC does te right thing and simply votes no, and we fire the negotiating Chairman.
05-15-2012, 03:00 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Originally Posted by Professor
My sincere hope is that if these are the numbers that the MEC does te right thing and simply votes no, and we fire the negotiating Chairman.
05-15-2012, 03:02 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 777 Sim Instructor
Posts: 745
Originally Posted by Professor
My sincere hope is that if these are the numbers that the MEC does te right thing and simply votes no, and we fire the negotiating Chairman.
05-15-2012, 03:05 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Originally Posted by finis72
He'll why wait for facts, let's fire the whole group right now !
My point is more that if this is the best we think we can do, it may be time for DALPA to send it all back to the table.
05-15-2012, 03:08 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,921
Originally Posted by TheManager
4 * 8 * 3 * 3.
No way. Includes 76 seater additions / neg. adjustment to prft shrng.
No way. Includes 76 seater additions / neg. adjustment to prft shrng.
05-15-2012, 03:12 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
Are you serious or is this a joke?
If this leak is correct, it stands as quite frankly a disrespectful offer.
I am beginning to think that the rushed timeline is part of the negotiating strategy and a ploy.
The sell now is going to be urgency.
Except this - NOW!
The offer is a one time only deal, reject it and the next will not be as good. Ratify it - NOW!
We need a hurried timeline for voting - NOW!
In the end, it might be apparent that there was no reason for the hurried hurried negotiation except to contrast the "except it now and capture the time/value or risk a drawn out section 6."
Kind of like a quick negotiating shock and awe to throw folks off balance.
05-15-2012, 03:19 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,921
Is anyone else having a hard time getting to the DALPA forums?
05-15-2012, 03:26 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 109
Originally Posted by TheManager
4 * 8 * 3 * 3.
No way. Includes 76 seater additions / neg. adjustment to prft shrng.
No way. Includes 76 seater additions / neg. adjustment to prft shrng.
If these are indeed the numbers, what happens if the MEC doesn't send it back? Let's hope they dont "punt."
History has shown we'd MEMRAT a ham sandwich.
05-15-2012, 03:30 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 320B
Posts: 781
Originally Posted by TheManager
4 * 8 * 3 * 3.
No way. Includes 76 seater additions / neg. adjustment to prft shrng.
No way. Includes 76 seater additions / neg. adjustment to prft shrng.
05-15-2012, 03:35 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 109
The numbers mean far less to me than Scope and work rules.
If we fixed other areas (rigs, min day, vacation, training, reserve pay....) W2s could improve significantly. IMO, we've already gave up enough 76 seaters. Scope and work rules are difficult to recapture.
If we fixed other areas (rigs, min day, vacation, training, reserve pay....) W2s could improve significantly. IMO, we've already gave up enough 76 seaters. Scope and work rules are difficult to recapture.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
