Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Details on Delta TA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/88532-details-delta-ta.html)

SayAlt 06-13-2015 01:43 PM


Originally Posted by qball (Post 1904018)
I'm not going to accuse anyone here of lying as that hinders a healthy debate, but I will say that DAPLA grossly misrepresented their "No Deal is Better Than a Bad Deal" banner not long ago.

According to Donatellis words, I don't think "No Deal" was even in their thought process.

His "fired all the bullets", "extracted every penny" and "if don't accept this deal" rhetoric clearly shows that "NO Deal" was ever an option in their thinking.

No plan for what to do should the MEC had done it's job and sent this back.

Now this "expedited negotiation, expedited vote" runaway train is barreling down the tracks and the only emergency brake is our NO votes.



This reminds a great deal of how DC seems to be operating re: the trade deal for Obama. Secret rooms, hush-hush, gotta vote for it now or else, find out the details later, etc, etc. The similarity is glaring.



Originally Posted by Denny Crane (Post 1904182)

Okay, here is the list you asked for. There are a dozen reasons to say no. Some are big and some are not. In the aggregate this is a NO vote in my book.

Denny


13. Executive Compensation will be calculated before Profit Sharing (ie. "leadership" get's their's before the troops)

MtEverest 06-13-2015 01:51 PM


Originally Posted by Bananie (Post 1903770)
This TA is not perfect either but if we wait for a perfect contract we will all be dead first. This is a lot of money for people that need it. I am an optimist, I concentrate on the good, some always concentrate on the bad.

Quit fixating on the money. It's not that great anyway. This TA is well beyond "not perfect". It's a huge concession and robs pilots of something they hold most dear, privacy.

No pilot here is waiting for a "perfect contract". They want something that is fair and deserve some big gains given:

1. The company is doing better financially right now than it has ever done in the history of it's operation as a Going Concern

2. Management has handsomely rewarded themselves. There is enough money to do the same for the guys/gals that move the airplanes.

3. Concessions should not be part of this contract given #1 and #2.

4. The sick policy is far, far overreaching and has the potential to violate the most sacredly held information of a pilot and his family.

5. We need to preserve widebody flying. It's the bread and butter of the flying here and the reason pilots chose Delta over Southwest.

6. Pilots that were on property got raped during bankruptcy and many sent home without a job.

Vote NO!

PS- You are not a pilot.

Denny Crane 06-13-2015 01:53 PM


Originally Posted by SayAlt (Post 1904193)
13. Executive Compensation will be calculated before Profit Sharing (ie. "leadership" get's their's before the troops)

Thought I covered that in number two but if not, it's now a bakers dozen! :)

Denny

SharpestTool 06-13-2015 01:55 PM


Originally Posted by TED74 (Post 1904136)
I'm thinking this forum is a dangerous place. I've spent days glued to it, happy how many people (here) plan to vote no. I've talked with most of my Delta buddies, who all think the TA stinks (but not all of whom can vote).

Then, I go fly the line and 100% of the Captains I've flown with (1 of 1) say "The pay is pretty good...we won't get more if we go back, I'm probably a yes" (thence commenced much discussion and he was receptive to the alternative - or appeared to be so).

Based on my statistically insignificant friend pool, I think the younger guys are pretty on-board with voting this down. But what about the As??? Especially those who don't "waste their time" here...I'm worried that the resistance isn't more organized.

You should be worried. Most of the captains have been around the block. They understand timely money in the pocket. They also understand that going back to RA for more is a silly thing to believe in. They understand that the next stop is the NMB and what happens down that road. Please see SWA, UPS, Fedex, Former US Airways, former AA.

Funny, my FO on my trip thinks it is a slam dunk Yes. Also, our jumpseating 767ER FO said it was a no brainer Yes as well. Both cited that history is littered with examples of not getting materially superior agreements after failed ratification or rejected TAs. Both also thought the NMB would laugh in DALPA's face when we demand more. Besides, looking at fixed pay plus PS, who could argue with AA + 20% or more?

Must admit, I wasn't going to argue against them. Smart FOs.

forgot to bid 06-13-2015 02:01 PM


Originally Posted by SharpestTool (Post 1904200)
You should be worried. Most of the captains have been around the block. They understand timely money in the pocket. They also understand that going back to RA for more is a silly thing to believe in. They understand that the next stop is the NMB and what happens down that road. Please see SWA, UPS, Fedex, Former US Airways, former AA.

Funny, my FO on my trip thinks it is a slam dunk Yes. Also, our jumpseating 767ER FO said it was a no brainer Yes as well. Both cited that history is littered with examples of not getting materially superior agreements after failed ratification or rejected TAs. Both also thought the NMB would laugh in DALPA's face when we demand more. Besides, looking at fixed pay plus PS, who could argue with AA + 20% or more?

Must admit, I wasn't going to argue against them. Smart FOs.

http://media.giphy.com/media/EouEzI5bBR8uk/giphy.gif

SOFA 06-13-2015 02:04 PM

Real gem here:

f. A pilot will not be awarded a GS or GSWC for a rotation if the rotation is within 30 minutes of creating an FAR conflict with the flight and/or flight duty period time of a rotation(s) on the pilot's line along with the rotation(s) that the pilot missed or will miss due to sick leave.

Exception one: A pilot who has utilized sick leave will be considered for a GS or GSWC, excluding the scheduled flight and flight period time for such sick leave rotation(s), after all pilots that are not subject to Section 23 Q. 7. f.

Thanks ALPA (Ain't Listening to our Pilots AGAIN!).

georgetg 06-13-2015 02:05 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1904174)
Please show one thing that George predicted wrong on C2012?

Carl

l'll play, George was wrong on his fear all Reserves would fly to ALV +15....

I was wrong.

What about my prediction of hiring?
What about my prediction on the Pinnacle CRJ200s
What about my slides about our JV?

were those wrong?
I'm happy to hear, but facts only please.

Cheers
George

forgot to bid 06-13-2015 02:06 PM

But reserves now could fly to alv +15. The barn door was opened. Many have done it.

SayAlt 06-13-2015 02:08 PM


Originally Posted by Denny Crane (Post 1904199)
Thought I covered that in number two but if not, it's now a bakers dozen! :)

Denny


Yes, you did. My apologies. Your version is fit for Wall St., while my version is best and most easily understood by the street itself. Mgmt eats first...directly at odds with every book on leadership ever written and a perfect example of why DAL "leadership" cannot and should never be trusted.

Denny Crane 06-13-2015 02:10 PM


Originally Posted by SayAlt (Post 1904209)
Yes, you did. My apologies. Your version is fit for Wall St., while my version is best and most easily understood by the street itself. Mgmt eats first...directly at odds with every book on leadership ever written and a perfect example of why DAL "leadership" cannot and should never be trusted.

I certainly won't disagree with you after this debacle.

Denny


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:06 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands