Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Details on Delta TA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/88532-details-delta-ta.html)

trico 06-13-2015 04:02 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1904208)
But reserves now could fly to alv +15. The barn door was opened. Many have done it.

I have...no fun:mad:

Carl Spackler 06-13-2015 04:10 PM


Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 1904302)
Please put me on your ignore list, then. Sorry I'm not perfect. I had a legal pad and a pen.

Hopefully the NC will put out something in the road show to explain this better. I'm not a fan of the changes but I can see why management is interested.

That's just it slowplay. Pilots don't need roadshows or negotiators to explain what the language does/probably mean. We can and should all do that for ourselves. The TA language is out on the MEC website. The lanaguage is clear and very straight forward. Reading the actual language is all anyone will need to make up their mind.

Carl

trico 06-13-2015 04:11 PM


Originally Posted by SharpestTool (Post 1904248)
A lot of hot air and little in regard to plan b. One participant suggests that re engaging the company is plan b. I agree.

Now let's take the next step. Does RA reward the Delta pilots and capitulate? Or does he say lets see what the NMB says?

Everyone voting no should have an opinion here. Let's hear them. If you want a yes voter like me to consider your view you have to show me how it ends. I can show you how a ratification ends. I realize it's the future and unknowable as such, but you have to have a realistic idea of a timeline and result in order to make sure it's worthwhile.

The NMB boogeyman schtick is getting a little old. Even if it was certain we didn't get one penny more after being parked I would vote no. If I'm going to get boned I'm gonna at least keep my pride intact. RA doesn't scare me or dazzle me with his smile, but I do respect his business savvy. That doesn't mean I'll lay down for him.

Carl Spackler 06-13-2015 04:14 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1904160)
Then when you go to save it not just to you computer but to your One Drive Personal on Word. If you haven't set up a Microsoft account you can do it from that point. Then once it's on your one drive account it's on the internet. Now you can go FILE -> SHARE -> and GET A SHARING LINK. Do the view only, so nobody messes with your stuff.

OK great, sounds pretty straight forward. Just one quick question...my computer: Exactly how do I turn it on?

Carl

MrBojangles 06-13-2015 04:16 PM


Originally Posted by trico (Post 1904313)
The NMB boogeyman schtick is getting a little old. Even if it was certain we didn't get one penny more after being parked I would vote no. If I'm going to get boned I'm gonna at least keep my pride intact. RA doesn't scare me or dazzle me with his smile, but I do respect his business savvy. That doesn't mean I'll lay down for him.

even if it does take 3 years, our current contract is better than the new POS! I just hope people look past the pay rates and delve into the rest of the contract.

SharpestTool 06-13-2015 04:22 PM

Ok. That wasn't so bad. So if I'm reading this right we will likely have to win this going through the NMB. Timeline probably undefined. That's the risk really I suppose. Do we get enough in a timeline that doesn't eat up any gains we achieve. I think we can all agree that beyond 18 months the numbers get real ugly. We will have to hope that the NMB agrees that our position is sound and management's position is unreasonable.

Short of that, we need to see capitulation from the company. We haven't seen capitulation from the others currently engaged with NMB. SWA really hurting right now from a TVM perspective.

Do SWA, UPS, and FedEx move if we shoot this down? Why would they? Could we join them waiting for someone to push the bar upward. On the other hand, if we ratify will their managements commit to the new standard? More importantly would the NMB now see our industry leading contract as the new reasonable position? If so, we could see those carriers break the NMB hold and advance. This would bode well of course for us 2.5 years down the road when we are back at it again.

Thoughts?

MrBojangles 06-13-2015 04:26 PM

if you think this is "industry leading" you are only looking at the pay rates

Abouttime2fish 06-13-2015 04:28 PM

So first, I am a 2014 hire, recently off probabation, so this is my first union experience. SO be easy on me if I am asking a silly question!

Read through all the red change items in the TA commuting in today and noticed they have redone all the math for reserve levels. Its all greeek and could not make out whether it means they will carry more reserves on any given day or less. But combined with the LCA change, it has me concerned. The LCA change may push me back to reserve. I know you're all crying about the 3 months I had to stand reserve, but now that I have a line, I realize its a much better way to live! They haven't changed the x-day tables, but if they raise the number of reserves required my ability to say move x-days for example, pretty much goes away I would think. Opinions?

I also read the 5+15 daily credit language....and I sure don't interpret it the same way the company has applied it! I can fly a 4 day trip with a 30 hour LO, and say the 3 days I do fly are 6 hours block each. My math (6+6+6+5+15) comes to 23+15. But what I see is 21 with 3 hours credit. I know it is not something that is changed in this TA, but what am I missing that obviously makes the math more complicated than a lowly MD-88 FO can figure out.....

trico 06-13-2015 04:32 PM


Originally Posted by SharpestTool (Post 1904319)
Ok. That wasn't so bad. So if I'm reading this right we will likely have to win this going through the NMB. Timeline probably undefined. That's the risk really I suppose. Do we get enough in a timeline that doesn't eat up any gains we achieve. I think we can all agree that beyond 18 months the numbers get real ugly. We will have to hope that the NMB agrees that our position is sound and management's position is unreasonable.
Thoughts?

Have you any thoughts on maybe it gets real ugly for the company if we don't fall all over ourselves voting yes on this? They aren't rushing to a new contract with us because of concern for our well-being. I'm not the sharpest tool :p so I don't know why the rush, but I do know RA doesn't do things for no reason. Let's send it back and sloooow way down. I doubt DAL will stop making money just to cut into our profit sharing while we re-group i.e. getting rid of some Quislings in the Association.

forgot to bid 06-13-2015 04:33 PM


Originally Posted by dtfl (Post 1904295)
amen. And they are the opposite of SMART FOs. By voting YES to this they are sacrificing their own QOL.

I actually don't believe him (Sharpest Tool] because I don't believe he is a Delta pilot to begin with. Never gets the vernacular right, can talk ancillary stuff but not inside baseball. No concept.

He's here to troll and get people riled up. Don't even quote him.

There are plenty of people here who are voting yes and are real Delta pilots. Just stick to them.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:18 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands